Author(s)

Masashi Takemura^*, Mamiko Takii, Nobuaki Kaibe, Tsutomu Oshima, Mitsuru Sasako

Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan.

Objective: This study evaluated the safety and operative utilities of the laparoscopic gastric mobilization compared with hand-assisted laparoscopic gastric mobilization. Patients and Methods: From April 2010 to November 2015, 125 patients with esophageal cancer have been performed laparoscopic mobilization; 33 under hand-assisted laparoscopic gastric mobilization (HLG group) and 92 under laparoscopic gastric mobilization without hand-assisted technique (LG group). Preoperative data and surgical outcomes of 2 groups were compared. Results: Preoperative data were not significantly different except for BMI. Operation time in abdominal procedure of LG group is significantly longer than HLG group (P < 0.0001). Otherwise, the blood loss and number of dissected nodes of abdominal procedure was not significantly different in two groups. The perioperative blood transfusions were needed in 7 cases (21.2%) in HLG group and 25 (27.1%) in LG group. The postoperative complications and mortality within 30 days after surgery were not significantly different in two groups. The length of hospital stay was 29 days in HLG group and 31 days in HG group, respectively. Conclusions: Our results suggested that laparoscopic gastric mobilization was safe technique and the short-term operative outcomes were comparable with that of hand-assisted laparoscopic mobilization.

Laparoscopic Gastric Mobilization, Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy, Esophageal Cancer

Takemura, M. , Takii, M. , Kaibe, N. , Oshima, T. and Sasako, M. (2016) Short Term Operative Outcomes of Laparoscopic Gastric Mobilization in Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: Comparison with Hand Assisted Technique. Surgical Science, 7, 279-285. doi: 10.4236/ss.2016.77039.