Open Journal of Modern Linguistics

Volume 6, Issue 2 (April 2016)

ISSN Print: 2164-2818   ISSN Online: 2164-2834

Google-based Impact Factor: 0.80  Citations  

Native and Non-Native Writers’ Use of Stance Adverbs in English Research Article Abstracts

HTML  XML Download Download as PDF (Size: 2260KB)  PP. 85-96  
DOI: 10.4236/ojml.2016.62008    3,926 Downloads   7,396 Views  Citations
Author(s)

ABSTRACT

Stance in scientific writing has been a major focus of attention. However, studies on stance in the research article abstracts have been relatively scarce in Turkey compared to those in other academic prose. Abstracts contain various sections in which information on the purpose, method, results, and conclusions of the study is presented to promote the study and to attract readers’ attention. In this respect, the abstract foregrounds the main findings and serves a promotional purpose (Hyland & Tse, 2005). By comparing abstracts written by Turkish and native writers of English, this paper tries to explore how academic writers from different scientific communities construct author’s stance in research article abstracts. In particular, the present study attempts to analyze lexico-grammatical features in research article abstracts focusing specifically on stance adverbs. Stance adverbs (clearly, probably, apparently) present the attitude or assessment of the speaker/writer with respect to the proposition (Biber, 2006). The corpus consists of 240 abstracts from the disciplines of sociology, psychology, linguistics, physics, chemistry and biology. The results revealed significant differences in the total number of stance adverbs. Native writers of English employed more stance adverbs in their abstracts than Turkish writers. Differences were also found of stance adverbs in soft and hard sciences. Academic writers in the soft sciences used more stance adverbs in their abstracts. Considering variations in scientific discourse across cultures and disciplines, the results of the study may have some pedagogical implications for academic writing courses.

Share and Cite:

Çakır, H. (2016) Native and Non-Native Writers’ Use of Stance Adverbs in English Research Article Abstracts. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 6, 85-96. doi: 10.4236/ojml.2016.62008.

Cited by

[1] Communicative Functions of Code Glosses in Academic Discourse
Selçuk Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 2022
[2] Stance Expressions in Introduction of English Research Articles written by Cambodian Authors
Register Journal, 2022
[3] Learning Oriented Assessment and Academic Writing
2022
[4] Nominal Stance in Cross-Disciplinary Academic Writing of Ll and L2 Speakers in Noun
2022
[5] Is academic writing less passivized? Corpus-based evidence from research article abstracts in applied linguistics over the past three decades (1990–2019)
Scientometrics, 2022
[6] Nominal stance in cross-disciplinary academic writing of L1 and L2 speakers in noun+ that constructions
Journal of Language and Education, 2022
[7] A LINGUISTIC STUDY OF PERSUASION AND NEGOTIATION IN RESEARCH ARTICLES OF ISLAMIC STUDIES: ISSUES AND CHALLENGES
2022
[8] A Comparative Study on Intensifiers in Opinion Articles on Rudaw Portal
Koya University Journal …, 2022
[9] A corpus-based study on Chinese and American students' rhetorical moves and stance features in dissertation abstracts
Frontiers in Psychology, 2022
[10] ANALYSIS OF STANCE FEATURES IN THE INTRODUCTION SECTION OF RESEARCH ARTICLES BETWEEN MALAYSIAN AND ENGLISH NATIVE …
2021
[11] A GENRE ANALYSIS OF ABSTRACTS IN THE ACADEMIC WRITING OF HARD AND SOFT DOMAINS: ESP AND FUNCTIONAL GRAMMAR APPROACHES
2021
[12] Expressions of criticality in expert and student writing: a corpus contrastive analysis of literature reviews
International Journal of …, 2021
[13] The Use of Lexical Hedges in Academic Writing
2021
[14] The Comparison of Evaluative That Clauses in Turkish L2 Novice and Expert Writers' Abstracts
Dil Araştırmaları, 2021
[15] Genre Analysis of Abstracts of Empirical Research Articles Published in TESOL Quarterly
2021
[16] A Comparative Study of Stance and Engagement Used by English and Thai Speakers in English Argumentative Essays.
2021
[17] A Corpus-based analysis of stance marking in research articles
2020
[18] A Systematic Review of Corpus-Based Studies on Academic Writing in the Turkish Context
2020
[19] Exploring Gender Differences in the Use of Hedges in Pakistani Engineering Research
2020
[20] Tantangan dalam Penulisan Artikel Abstrak Penelitihan untuk Publikasi
2020
[21] Differences in Research Abstracts written in Arabic, French, and English
2020
[22] A Corpus-based Analysis of Epistemic Stance Adverbs in Essays Written by Native English Speakers and Iranian EFL Learners
2020
[23] A review of research on authorial evaluation in English academic writing: A methodological perspective
2020
[24] Grammatical Metaphor in Academic Writing: Functional Diversity of Process Nominalisation in Research Article Abstracts Across Disciplines
2020
[25] An Exploration of interactive and Interactional Relationship (Metadiscourse) in Research Discourses of Pakistan through Corpus-based TechniquesAn Exploration of …
2019
[26] The Use of Hedging in Research Articles on Applied Linguistics
2019
[27] EPISTEMIC STANCE PERSONAL PRONOUNS IN MALAYSIAN TERTIARY LEVEL ESL ISLAMIC BASED WRITTEN TASKS
e-JURNAL PENYELIDIKAN DAN INOVASI, 2019
[28] A corpus-driven analysis of certainty stance adverbs: Obviously, really and actually in spoken native and learner English
2019
[29] Uses of 'actually'in spoken learner corpora
2019
[30] Certainty adverbs in spoken learner language
2019
[31] The Use of Hedging in Research Artciles on Applied Linguistics
2019
[32] Epistemic stance personal pronouns in Malaysian tertiary level ESL. Islamic based written tasks
2019
[33] An Exploration of interactive and Interactional Relationship (Metadiscourse) in Research Discourses of Pakistan through Corpus-based TechniquesAn …
2019
[34] THE IMPLEMENTATION OF DISCLAIM IN ELT ARTICLES TO PROPOSE THE WRITERS‟ ARGUMENTATION
2019
[35] Mapping Stance Adverbials in Pakistani Academic Discourse: A Corpus Based Interdisciplinary Study
2018
[36] STANCE IN ACADEMIC WRITING
2018
[37] 'This study examined…'Self-mentions in Research Article Abstracts
2018
[38] Strengthening or weakening claims in academic knowledge construction: A comparative study of hedges and boosters in postgraduate academic writing
2018
[39] INTERACTION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH ARTICLE
2018
[40] A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MACRO-TEXTUAL ORGANIZATION AND METADISCOURSE FEATURES IN ELT RESEARCH ARTICLE INTRODUCTIONS …
2017
[41] Construction of Stance through the Use of Retrospective Labels by American and Turkish Academic Writers.
2017
[42] Construction of Stance through the Use of Retrospective Labels by American and Turkish Academic Writers
English Language Teaching, 2017
[43] An Intercultural Investigation of Meta-Discourse Features in Research Articles by American and Turkish Academic Writers
International Journal of Languages' Education and Teaching, 2017
[44] A Rhetorical Analysis of Conference Abstracts in Greek and English: A Corpus-based Comparison
2017
[45] A CROSS-DISCIPLINE COMPARISON OF ABSTRACTS IN RESEARCH ARTICLES: A CORPUS-BASED STUDY
2017
[46] ИНТЕНЦИОНАЛЬНАЯ СТРУКТУРА И МОДАЛЬНОСТЬ НАУЧНОГО ТЕКСТА
2016
[47] AN ANALYSIS OF “STANCE DEVICES” IN SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH ARTICLES BY NATIVE AND TURKISH WRITERS
[48] MAALIC 2021
[49] A Cognitive Domain Analysis of English Stance Adverbs
[50] Proclivity Towards Local vs Global Discourse Community Conventions: Metadiscourse in Academic Writing

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.