Open Journal of Political Science

Volume 5, Issue 3 (April 2015)

ISSN Print: 2164-0505   ISSN Online: 2164-0513

Google-based Impact Factor: 0.30  Citations  

Qualified for Power? On Epistemology in Voting

HTML  XML Download Download as PDF (Size: 261KB)  PP. 210-218  
DOI: 10.4236/ojps.2015.53022    4,026 Downloads   4,567 Views  


Equal distribution of suffrage is given a nearly “quasi-religious” status by democrats. However, the right to vote rests on a presumption of capacity, and knowledge and competence therefore are important features of democratic arrangements. Democratic theory often assumes that, in order for (representative) democracy to work properly, the average citizen should be interested in, and pay attention to, politics. In reality, however, only a minority of citizens live up to these standards. This paper examines whether demands of uncontroversial knowledge, that is, knowledge about what it means to vote, can be demanded of voters in order for them to be allowed to vote. It is concluded that, for reasons of justice and “issues of mutual concern”, such demands can be raised regarding such uncontroversial knowledge (but perhaps not for knowledge more controversial in kind).

Cite this paper

Wiman, S. (2015) Qualified for Power? On Epistemology in Voting. Open Journal of Political Science, 5, 210-218. doi: 10.4236/ojps.2015.53022.

Cited by

No relevant information.

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.