Open Journal of Radiology

Volume 4, Issue 3 (September 2014)

ISSN Print: 2164-3024   ISSN Online: 2164-3032

Google-based Impact Factor: 0.33  Citations  

Radiation Field Preference for Radiographic Anatomical Markers by Radiographers in a University Teaching Hospital in Nigeria

HTML  Download Download as PDF (Size: 2675KB)  PP. 275-278  
DOI: 10.4236/ojrad.2014.43036    5,191 Downloads   6,718 Views  Citations

ABSTRACT

Objective: The work aims to determine the radiographers’ preference between primary and secondary radiation fields for imprinting anatomical markers on radiographs. Methodology: Processed radiographs from the darkroom with evidence of radiographic anatomical markings were selected randomly and reviewed using a viewing box, within a 4-week period. The radiation field in which markers were placed was noted for each radiograph. Faintly-appearing and partly coned- off markers were excluded. Simple statistical tools were used to derive central tendency. Result: 623 radiographs were assessed. 89.0% (n = 555) had markers in the primary radiation field while 11.0% (n = 68) were in the secondary radiation field. 98% (n = 611) of markers did not obstruct essential anatomy while 2% (n = 12) did, but the radiographs were neither repeated nor rejected because of the twin reason of reportability and the need to avoid additional radiation dose to patients. Conclusion: Radiographers in the centre preferred the primary radiation field for marker placement to avoid cone-off, cut-off and illegibility which leads to repeat. This, however, does not offer superior advantage to markers placed in secondary radiation field. It is recommended that marker placement preference should be guided by the need for legibility, aesthetics and avoidance of essential anatomy.

Share and Cite:

Adejoh, T. , Onwuzu, S. , Nkubli, F. and Ikegwuonu, N. (2014) Radiation Field Preference for Radiographic Anatomical Markers by Radiographers in a University Teaching Hospital in Nigeria. Open Journal of Radiology, 4, 275-278. doi: 10.4236/ojrad.2014.43036.

Cited by

[1] The use of anatomical side markers in general radiology: A systematic review of the current literature
Journal of Patient …, 2022
[2] Anatomical Side Markers and Postprocessing Side Labeling
2020
[3] An audit of radiographers' practice of left-right image annotation in film-screen radiography and after installation of computed radiography in a tertiary hospital …
2020
[4] A clinical audit of anatomical side marker use in a pediatric medical imaging department: A quantitative and qualitative investigation
2020
[5] Causes of Reject and Repeat of Digital Radiographic Images: A Literature Review to Guide the Practice of Radiography in Zambia
2020
[6] Factors that affect Teaching and Learning among Undergraduate Radiography Students in two Nigerian Universities
Journal of Radiography & Radiation Sciences, 2019
[7] Anatomic Site Markers: Evaluation of Their Use among Maltese Radiographers
Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, 2016
[8] Czy zawsze stosuje się oznaczenie strony badanej w rentgenodiagnostyce klasycznej?
In?ynier i Fizyk Medyczny, 2016

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.