Journal of Cancer Therapy

Volume 5, Issue 7 (June 2014)

ISSN Print: 2151-1934   ISSN Online: 2151-1942

Google-based Impact Factor: 0.30  Citations  h5-index & Ranking

Patient Satisfaction with and Acceptance of Their Totally-Implanted Central Venous Catheter: Construction and First Validation of a Questionnaire

HTML  XML Download Download as PDF (Size: 357KB)  PP. 706-716  
DOI: 10.4236/jct.2014.57079    4,454 Downloads   5,828 Views  Citations

ABSTRACT

Rationale: Most cancer patients require a totally-implanted Central Venous Catheter (CVC) for their treatment. We develop and validate a French-language questionnaire dubbed QASICC (Questionnaire for Acceptance of and Satisfaction with Implanted Central Venous Catheter) assessing patient satisfaction with and acceptance of their CVC. Method: The construction and first validation of the questionnaire was made using validated methodology consisting in four phases. Phase 1 aimed at collecting a comprehensive list of relevant items. Phase 2 consisted in converting items into questions followed by a first item selection procedure. Phase 3 tested the acceptance of the provisional module to a small number of patients. Phase 4 involved a first validation on patients to determine its psychometric characteristics. Results: Responses to the questionnaire were collected from 215 patients. The final tool included 27 questions assessing seven dimensions: pain, contribution to the comfort of the treatment, esthetics and privacy, impact on professional activities, social and sports, impact on daily activities, local discomfort and overall satisfaction.Conclusions: This first statistical validation seems very promising and allows us to confirm the structure and the psychometric properties of the tool. Further validation studies are required on standard and specific populations in order to confirm these first results.

Share and Cite:

Marcy, P. , Mari, V. , Figl, A. , Ben-Taarit, I. , Fouché, Y. , Peyrade, F. , Follana, P. , Michel, C. and Chamorey, E. (2014) Patient Satisfaction with and Acceptance of Their Totally-Implanted Central Venous Catheter: Construction and First Validation of a Questionnaire. Journal of Cancer Therapy, 5, 706-716. doi: 10.4236/jct.2014.57079.

Cited by

[1] Comparison of the Quality of Life of Patients with Breast or Colon Cancer with an Arm Vein Port (TIVAD) Versus a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC)
2021
[2] Trapezius Port Placement in Patients with Breast Cancer: Long-Term Follow-up and Quality-of-Life Assessment
2019
[3] Protocol for a systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient experiences of central venous access devices in anti-cancer treatment
2018
[4] Decisional conflict in patients scheduled for insertion of a Central Venous Catheter to receive chemotherapy: protocol for a cross-sectional study
Biomedicine & Prevention, 2018
[5] Patient Satisfaction and Acceptance of Their Totally Implanted Central Venous Catheter: A French Prospective Multicenter Study
The Journal of Vascular Access, 2017
[6] Quality-of-life assessment: arm TIVAD versus chest TIVAD
The journal of vascular access, 2016
[7] Satisfaction and Quality of Life Related to Chemotherapy With an Arm Port: A Pilot Study
Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal, 2016
[8] Validation multicentrique d’un questionnaire évaluant l’acceptation et la satisfaction des patients porteurs de chambre à cathéter implantable: le questionnaire QASICC
Bulletin du Cancer, 2015

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.