Journal of Cancer Therapy

Volume 5, Issue 3 (March 2014)

ISSN Print: 2151-1934   ISSN Online: 2151-1942

Google-based Impact Factor: 0.30  Citations  h5-index & Ranking

Skin-Sparing Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction: An Update for Clinical Practice

HTML  XML Download Download as PDF (Size: 721KB)  PP. 264-280  
DOI: 10.4236/jct.2014.53034    6,957 Downloads   11,159 Views  Citations

ABSTRACT

Aim: To provide an up-to-date review of the literature on skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) for breast cancer (BC). The article also reviews the oncological safety, effects of radiotherapy (RT) on immediate breast reconstruction (IBR), the indications for preserving the nipple-areola complex (NAC) and the emerging role of allogenic grafts as adjuncts to implant in IBR. Methods: Review of the English literature from 1965 to 2013 was carried out using Medline and PubMed research engines. Results: SSM is oncologically safe in appropriately selected cases of invasive breast cancer (IBC) and ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS) including IBC < 5 cm, multi-centric tumours, DCIS and for risk-reduction surgery. Inflammatory breast cancer and tumours with extensive skin involvement represent contra-indications to SSM due to an unacceptable risk of local recurrence. Prior breast irradiation or the need for post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) do not preclude SSM with IBR, however the aesthetic outcome may be compromised by radiation. Preservation of the nipple-areola complex (NAC) has aesthetic and psychological benefits and is safe for peripherally located node negative unifocal tumours. An intraoperative frozen section protocol for the retro-areolar tissue should be performed when NAC preservation is considered. The advent of acellular dermal matrix has enhanced the scope of implant-based immediate reconstruction following SSM. Cell-assisted fat transfer is emerging as a promising technique to optimise the aesthetics outcome. There is no sufficient evidence to support the role of endoscopic mastectomy in clinical practice. Conclusion: Numerous retrospective and prospective studies show that SSM is oncolgically safe in appropriately selected cases and is aesthetically superior to non-SSM mastectomy. New tech-niques such as the use of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) and cell-assisted fat transfer have increased the use of implants for volume replacement following SSM. In the absence of randomized clinical trials, an updated systematic meta-analysis of published studies is required in order to consolidate the evidence.

Share and Cite:

Kasem, A. , Choy, C. and Mokbel, K. (2014) Skin-Sparing Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction: An Update for Clinical Practice. Journal of Cancer Therapy, 5, 264-280. doi: 10.4236/jct.2014.53034.

Cited by

[1] Overview of Oncoplastic Breast Surgery Techniques for the Treatment of Breast Cancer with Review of Normal and Abnormal Postsurgical Imaging Findings
Current Radiology …, 2022
[2] Fatores prognósticos e preditivos da resposta clínica e patológica em mulheres com carcinoma de mama submetidas a quimioterapia neoadjuvante: Prognostic and …
2018
[3] PROGNOSTIC AND PREDICTIVE FACTORS OF THE CLINICAL AND PATHOLOGICAL RESPONSE IN WOMEN WITH BREAST CARCINOMA SUBMITTED TO NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY
Dissertation, 2018
[4] Rizik primjene aloplastičnih materijala kod primarne rekonstrukcije dojke
2017
[5] Biological and synthetic mesh use in breast reconstructive surgery: a literature review
World journal of surgical oncology, 2016
[6] Biological and synthetic mesh use in breast reconstructive surgery: a literature review.
World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2015

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.