American Journal of Plant Sciences

Volume 3, Issue 11 (November 2012)

ISSN Print: 2158-2742   ISSN Online: 2158-2750

Google-based Impact Factor: 1.20  Citations  h5-index & Ranking

Evaluation of Biological Soil Fertility Management Practices for Corn Production in Oxisols

HTML  Download Download as PDF (Size: 887KB)  PP. 1654-1660  
DOI: 10.4236/ajps.2012.311201    4,470 Downloads   8,231 Views  Citations

ABSTRACT

Field trials on the management of soil biological fertility with aim to increasing corn production were conducted in a savannah region of the DR-Congo. Three organic matters including fresh biomass of Entada abyssinica, Tithonia diversifolia, Stylosanthes gracilis and a mineral combination of nitrogen and phosphorus (NP) (115-63-0) along with a control (without fertilization) were evaluated for corn crop growth and production. The field trial was a completely randomized design with four replicates. Plant height, basal stem diameter, and yield components were assessed. Irrespective of fertilization treatments and variety, maize showed a similar growth up to 20 days after sowing (DAS), and then two distinct trends were observed. At 60 DAS, plant height and basal diameter were significantly bigger in plots treated with NP, T. diversifolia and E. abyssinica compared to S. gracilis treatment and control (NoF). This pattern was also confirmed with agronomic traits such as cob length, number of kernel per cob, and net grain yield. The local variety was the least productive under any treatment. In general, the response of corn crop to organic and inorganic fertilization showed that the mineral combination (NP) increased the most grain yield and other yield components compared to unfertilized trial, followed by T. divessifolia and E. abyssinica. NP and T. diversifolia treatments increased significantly and equally soil potassium content compared to control and other treatments. Application of T. diversifolia appears a more cost effective approach for small farmers to improving fertility of the oxisol prevailing in Central Africa compared to mineral fertilizers.

Share and Cite:

M. Muyayabantu, B. Kadiata and K. Nkongolo, "Evaluation of Biological Soil Fertility Management Practices for Corn Production in Oxisols," American Journal of Plant Sciences, Vol. 3 No. 11, 2012, pp. 1654-1660. doi: 10.4236/ajps.2012.311201.

Cited by

[1] 基于主成分和聚类分析的丹江口水源区农田土壤肥力质量评价——以淅川县为例
2021
[2] Composting performance of vermiculite-cattle manure composts and their effects on selected soil properties and maize (zea mays L.) production on sandy loam …
2021
[3] Responses of Maize and Tomato Crops to Fertilization with Three Agroforestry Litter Species (Annona senegalensis, Terminalia macroptera and Parkia …
2020
[4] Responses of Maize and Tomato Crops to Fertilization with Three Agroforestry Litter Species (Annona senegalensis, Terminalia macroptera and Parkia biglobosa)
2020
[5] Amélioration du sol dégradé par l'apport d'engrais inorganique, organiques et évaluation de rendement du maïs (Zea mays L.) dans la province de Lomami, …
International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 2017
[6] La culture du maïs sur les oxisols en République Démocratique du Congo
2017
[7] Application of organic amendments to restore soil health and productivity of a degraded soil.
2017
[8] Molecular relatedness and morpho-agronomic characteristics of congolese accessions of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) for breeding purposes
Br Biotech J, 2014
[9] Assessing the Effects of Integrated Soil Fertility Management on Biological Efficiency and Economic Advantages of Intercropped Maize (Zea Mays L.) and Soybean (Glycine Max L.) in DR Congo
American Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 2013
[10] Assessing the effects of integrated soil fertility management on biological efficiency and economic advantages of intercropped maize (Zea mays L.) and soybean …
2013
[11] Assessing the effects of integrated soil fertility management on biological efficiency and economic advantages of intercropped maize (Zea mays L.) and …
American Journal of …, 2013

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.