International Journal of Geosciences

Volume 3, Issue 5 (October 2012)

ISSN Print: 2156-8359   ISSN Online: 2156-8367

Google-based Impact Factor: 0.56  Citations  h5-index & Ranking

Reformulation of the Vening-Meinesz Moritz Inverse Problem of Isostasy for Isostatic Gravity Disturbances

HTML  Download Download as PDF (Size: 2000KB)  PP. 918-929  
DOI: 10.4236/ijg.2012.325094    4,767 Downloads   8,306 Views  Citations

ABSTRACT

The isostatic gravity anomalies have been traditionally used to solve the inverse problems of isostasy. Since gravity measurements are nowadays carried out together with GPS positioning, the utilization of gravity disturbances in various regional gravimetric applications becomes possible. In global studies, the gravity disturbances can be computed using global geopotential models which are currently available to a relatively high accuracy and resolution. In this study we facilitate the definition of the isostatic gravity disturbances in the Vening-Meinesz Moritz inverse problem of isostasy for finding the Moho depths. We further utilize uniform mathematical formalism in the gravimetric forward modelling based on methods for a spherical harmonic analysis and synthesis of gravity field. We then apply both mathematical procedures to determine globally the Moho depths using the isostatic gravity disturbances. The results of gravimetric inversion are finally compared with the global crustal seismic model CRUST2.0; the RMS fit of the gravimetric Moho model with CRUST2.0 is 5.3 km. This is considerably better than the RMS fit of 7.0 km obtained after using the isostatic gravity anomalies.

Share and Cite:

R. Tenzer and M. Bagherbandi, "Reformulation of the Vening-Meinesz Moritz Inverse Problem of Isostasy for Isostatic Gravity Disturbances," International Journal of Geosciences, Vol. 3 No. 5A, 2012, pp. 918-929. doi: 10.4236/ijg.2012.325094.

Cited by

[1] MOHV21: a least squares combination of five global Moho depth models
Journal of Geodesy, 2022
[2] Combination of three global Moho density contrast models by a weighted least-squares procedure
Journal of Applied Geodesy, 2022
[3] On Moho Determination by the Vening Meinesz-Moritz Technique
2021
[4] Reformulation of Parker–Oldenburg's method for Earth's spherical approximation
2020
[5] Interface inversion of gravitational data using spherical triangular tessellation: An application for the estimation of the Moon's crustal thickness
2019
[6] Estimating a combined Moho model for marine areas via satellite altimetric-gravity and seismic crustal models
2019
[7] How to Calculate Bouguer Gravity Data in Planetary Studies
Surveys in Geophysics, 2018
[8] A regional gravimetric Moho recovery under Tibet using gravitational potential data from a satellite global model
Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica, 2018
[9] Combined Gravimetric–Seismic Crustal Model for Antarctica
Surveys in Geophysics, 2018
[10] Towards the Moho depth and Moho density contrast along with their uncertainties from seismic and satellite gravity observations
Journal of Applied Geodesy, 2017
[11] Moho Modeling Using FFT Technique
Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2017
[12] Gravity Inversion
Gravity Inversion and Integration, 2017
[13] 垂直重力梯度反演 Moho 面的频谱域公式及其应用
2016
[14] Theoretical deficiencies of isostatic schemes in modeling the crustal thickness along the convergent continental tectonic plate boundaries
Journal of Earth Science, 2016
[15] Global Isostatic Gravity Maps From Satellite Missions and Their Applications in the Lithospheric Structure Studies
IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing , 2016
[16] Generalized model for a Moho inversion from gravity and vertical gravity-gradient data
2016
[17] Formula of Moho inversion in the spectral domain using vertical gravity gradient and its application
2016
[18] 垂直重力梯度反演犕狅犺狅面的频谱域公式及其应用
2016
[19] Isostatic crustal thickness under the Tibetan Plateau and Himalayas from satellite gravity gradiometry data
Earth Sciences Research Journal?, 2015
[20] On Gravity Inversion by No-Topography and Rigorous Isostatic Gravity Anomalies
Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2015
[21] The development of physical geodesy during 1984-2014–A personal review
Journal of Geodetic Science, 2015
[22] A new Fennoscandian crustal thickness model based on CRUST1. 0 and a gravimetric–isostatic approach
Earth-Science Reviews, 2015
[23] Modelling Moho depth in ocean areas based on satellite altimetry using Vening Meinesz–Moritz'method
Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica, 2015
[24] Comparison of various isostatic marine gravity disturbances
2015
[25] Comparative Study of the Uniform and Variable Moho Density Contrast in the Vening Meinesz-Moritz's Isostatic Scheme fortheGravimetric Moho Recovery
International Association of Geodesy Symposia book series, 2015
[26] Moho depth uncertainties in the Vening-Meinesz Moritz inverse problem of isostasy
Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica, 2014
[27] Isostasy–Geodesy
Encyclopedia of Geodesy, 2014
[28] Inverse problem for the gravimetric modeling of the crust-mantle density contrast
Contributions to Geophysics and Geodesy, 2013
[29] Improved global crustal thickness modeling based on the VMM isostatic model and non-isostatic gravity correction
Journal of Geodynamics, 2013
[30] On the isostatic gravity anomaly and disturbance and their applications to Vening Meinesz–Moritz gravimetric inverse problem
Geophysical Journal International, 2013
[31] Expressions for the global gravimetric Moho modeling in spectral domain
Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2013
[32] Isostatic gravity disturbances in the definition of the Vening Meinesz-Moritz inverse problem of isostasy
2013

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.