Psychology

Volume 3, Issue 2 (February 2012)

ISSN Print: 2152-7180   ISSN Online: 2152-7199

Google-based Impact Factor: 1.81  Citations  

Are There Sex Differences in Reaction to Different Types of Sexual Infidelity?

HTML  Download Download as PDF (Size: 43KB)  PP. 161-164  
DOI: 10.4236/psych.2012.32024    8,137 Downloads   14,881 Views  Citations

ABSTRACT

Evolutionary theory based research shows that women and men can differ in their responses to sexual and emotional infidelity. However, research has not examined the question of whether men and women react similarly or differently to a partner’s engagement in different types of sexual infidelity. The present research sought to answer this question. Based on the aforementioned prior research, and short term mating desires, sex differences in reactions to different types of sexual infidelity were not expected. Both women and men were expected to report higher levels of upset when a partner engaged in sexual intercourse rather than when a partner engaged in oral sex, heavy petting, or kissing with another person. The results were consistent with the hypothesis. Both men and women were most upset by a partner’s engagement in sexual intercourse with another person. These findings are discussed in terms of prior research.

Share and Cite:

Wade, T. , Kelley, R. & Church, D. (2012). Are There Sex Differences in Reaction to Different Types of Sexual Infidelity?. Psychology, 3, 161-164. doi: 10.4236/psych.2012.32024.

Cited by

[1] Preventative Factors Against Infidelity Among Military Members
2022
[2] Unforgiveness Motivations in Romantic Relationships Experiencing Infidelity: Negative Affect and Anxious Attachment to the Partner as Predictors
2019
[3] Physical Attractiveness: Sexual Satisfaction, Promiscuity and Infidelity
2018
[4] UNDERSTANDING HOW COUPLES MAINTAIN MONOGAMY: THE DEVELOPMENT OF A THEORY OF PROTECTIVE FACTORS USING GROUNDED THEORY
Dissertation, Kent State University, 2018
[5] Do Men and Women Experience Forgiveness Differently in Response to Various Types of Infidelity?
ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 2018
[6] Preventing Infidelity: A Theory of Protective Factors
The Family Journal, 2018
[7] Perception Differences on Infidelity: A Multivariate Study
2018
[8] Attachment Style, Fear of Intimacy, and Romantic Jealousy
2018
[9] Relación entre tendencia a la infidelidad emocional y/o sexual e inteligencia emocional, en estudiantes universitarios.
2016
[10] " Factores que contribuyen a que una experiencia de infidelidad tenga resultados positivos en una pareja" perspectivas de profesionales en el área de la salud mental que trabajan con parejas
2015
[11] Sonja Embree, PhD, Directora de Trabajo de Titulación
2015
[12] Evaluación de impacto y de resultados del programa “Empretec®”, aplicado por la Caja De Compensación Familiar Cafam para Colombia en 2014
2015
[13] " Factores que contribuyen a que una experiencia de infidelidad tenga resultados positivos en una pareja" perspectivas de profesionales en el área de la salud …
2015
[14] RELACIÓN ENTRE TENDENCIA A LA INFIDELIDAD EMOCIONAL Y/O SEXUAL E INTELIGENCIA EMOCIONAL, EN ESTUDIANTES UNIVERSITARIOS
2014
[15] Friendship as a relationship infiltration tactic during human mate poaching
2013
[16] Jealousy and relationship closeness: exploring the good (reactive) and bad (suspicious) sides of romantic jealousy
SAGE Open, 2013
[17] Jealousy and Relationship Closeness Exploring the Good (Reactive) and Bad (Suspicious) Sides of Romantic Jealousy
Sage Open, 2013
[18] Imagined Infidelity Scenario Forgiveness and Distress: The Role of Method of Discovery and Specific Cheating Behavior
Research in Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 2013
[19] Friendship as a relationship infiltration tactic during human mate poaching.
Evolutionary Psychology, 2013
[20] Friendship As A Relationship Infiltration Tactic During Human Mate Poaching: An Experimental Investigation
2013
[21] The roles of commitment and attributions on uninvolved partner responses to imagined sexual infidelity
2013
[22] Jealousy and Relationship Closeness
Sage Open, 2013

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.