Author(s)

Kwang Mo Yang, Young Wook Cho, Seung Hee Choi, Jae Hyun Park, Kyoung Sik Kang

Department of Industrial & Management Engineering, Myongji University, Yongin, Korea.
Department of Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania, USA..
Department of Industrial Engineering, Yuhan University, Puchoen, Korea.
Department of Qualification Trend Analysis, Human Resource Development Service, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Technology & Systems Management, Induk Institute of Technology, Seoul, Korea.

Recently, most businesses have introduced a system for improving their responsibility to the customers in terms of job improvement. For example, small-quantity batch production increases cost but improve efficiency of management. Companies have been introduced the balanced scorecard to evaluate their management as part of improvement, while they suffer from many trials and errors. Many businesses still have difficulty in introducing balance scorecard concept in their process, but we suggest a method to successfully introduce the balance scorecard. This study aims to suggest a new performance measurement model reflecting relative importance of the key performance indicators for each factor. Our model is applied to several companies in real-world to validate the new model. Also, our study proposes a methodology for an adequate performance measurement using multiple attribute decision making.

Balanced Scorecard, Multiple Attribute Decision Making, Management Evaluation

K. Yang, Y. Cho, S. Choi, J. Park and K. Kang, "A Study on Development of Balanced Scorecard for Management Evaluation Using Multiple Attribute Decision Making," Journal of Software Engineering and Applications, Vol. 3 No. 3, 2010, pp. 268-272. doi: 10.4236/jsea.2010.33032.