Author(s)

James E. Stobaugh, Sean Huss

Department of Behavioral Sciences, Arkansas Tech University, Russellville, USA.

Social movement framing within the legal context extends its impact far beyond the confines of the courtroom, yet there remains a significant dearth of knowledge regarding the ramifications of employing legal framing strategies within judicial settings. This paper embarks on the task of addressing this knowledge gap, delving into the repercussions of legal framing with regards to the contentious topics of creationism, creation science, and intelligent design. Over the past eight decades, these ideological battles have unfolded within the legal system, as proponents and opponents alike have resorted to legal action to contest or uphold decisions made by local school boards and state legislatures. Within this legal arena, these movements are perpetually engaged in the intricate task of framing their positions in a manner that resonates with the courts, aiming to secure favorable rulings. However, these frames have far-reaching unintended consequences beyond the realm of law. Employing a comparative historical approach through case studies, we shed light on the profound impact that these legal frames have exerted on policy adoption. Our findings underscore the existence of a reciprocal relationship between legal framing and policy, particularly for movements enjoying staunch support from committed policymakers and widespread public backing. In essence, legal framing carries significant weight, shaping not only courtroom outcomes but also leaving an indelible mark on the broader sociopolitical landscape.

Legal Framing, Policy, Social Movements, Creationism, Creations Science, Intelligent Design

Stobaugh, J. and Huss, S. (2024) Policy Significance of Social Movement Legal Framing: A Study of Creationism and Intelligent Design. Open Journal of Political Science, 14, 215-233. doi: 10.4236/ojps.2024.142014.