Beijing Law Review

Volume 15, Issue 1 (March 2024)

ISSN Print: 2159-4627   ISSN Online: 2159-4635

Google-based Impact Factor: 0.38  Citations  h5-index & Ranking

A Comparative Analysis of the Right to a Fair Trial in Pakistan in Context with ICCPR’s Set out Standards

HTML  XML Download Download as PDF (Size: 355KB)  PP. 231-248  
DOI: 10.4236/blr.2024.151015    99 Downloads   679 Views  

ABSTRACT

A fair trial is a cornerstone of justice in any liberal democracy and it guarantees fundamental safeguards in the court system, including due process of law and equality before the law. This research article explains two questions in principle whether Pakistan’s criminal justice system ensures the due process of law so far as trial to a fair trial is concerned, the second question is related to whether Pakistan complies with ICCPR’s principles of being signatory to the covenant. Looking for areas of agreement and contrast as well as considering the implications these findings have the search for justice and the defense of human rights. By comparing and contrasting Article 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) with Article 10-A of the Constitution of Pakistan, and considering how these two clauses affect Pakistan’s justice system and international law. Pakistan has pledged to protect right to a fair trial by ratifying the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). Nonetheless, substantial obstacles remain in the actual application of this right within the country’s criminal justice system, despite the country’s commitment to ensuring that everyone has access to justice. This research article discusses the causes behind Pakistan’s violations of the right to a fair trial, exploring important variables contributing to these issues and discussing the ramifications for human rights and justice in the nation.

Share and Cite:

Jamali, N. , Yi, Y. , Wu, H. , Khoso, A. , Mahar, W. and Bano, A. (2024) A Comparative Analysis of the Right to a Fair Trial in Pakistan in Context with ICCPR’s Set out Standards. Beijing Law Review, 15, 231-248. doi: 10.4236/blr.2024.151015.

Cited by

No relevant information.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.