Author(s)

Shereen Mamdouh Kamal, Khaled Mohamed Fares, Sahar Abdel-Baky Mohamed, Mohanad Ahmed Mohamed^*, Fatma Adel El Sherif

Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management Department, South Egypt Cancer Institute, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.

Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) across cortical brain areas appears to improve various forms of pain, yet evidence of tDCS efficiency and ideal stimulation target is lacking. This study aimed to compare the add-on analgesic efficacy of concentric electrode transcranial direct current stimulation (CE-tDCS) stimulation over the primary motor cortex versus the insular cortex on the management of chronic postmastectomy pain. Method: Prospective randomized double-blind sham-controlled study enrolled eighty patients with chronic postmastectomy pain that were randomly assigned to four groups: active motor (AM), sham motor (SM), active insula (AI) and sham insula (SI) group, each received 5 sessions for 20-minute duration with 2 mA tDCS over the targeted area of the contralateral side of pain. Our primary outcome was VAS score, the secondary outcomes were VDS score, LANSS score and depression symptoms by HAM-D scores, assessment was done at 4 time points (prestimulation, after 5^th session, 15^th day and one month after the last session). Results: Both active tDCS groups (motor and insula) showed reduction of VAS (P < 0.001), VDS (P < 0.001), LANSS (P < 0.001) and HAM-D score (P < 0.001) than sham groups. Conclusion: Active tDCS stimulation either targeting the primary motor cortex or the insula cortex has add-on analgesic effect for controlling neuropathic chronic post mastectomy pain and the maximum effect was at 15 days after the last session.

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, tDCS, Postmastectomy Pain, Motor Cortex, Insular Cortex

Kamal, S. , Fares, K. , Mohamed, S. , Mohamed, M. and El Sherif, F. (2023) Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of Motor Cortex versus Insula Cortex on Chronic Post-Mastectomy Pain: Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial. Open Journal of Anesthesiology, 13, 197-211. doi: 10.4236/ojanes.2023.1310018.