Author(s)

Kwabena Abedi¹, Julius Codjoe¹, Raju Thapa², Vijaya Gopu¹

¹Department of Civil Engineering, University of Louisiana, Lafayette, Louisiana, USA.
²Traffic Simulation & Safety Analysis, Design Division, Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, Texas, USA.

Using Louisiana’s Interstate system, this paper aims to demonstrate how data can be used to evaluate freight movement reliability, economy, and safety of truck freight operations to improve decision-making. Data mainly from the National Performance Management Research Data Set (NPMRDS) and the Louisiana Crash Database were used to analyze Truck Travel Time Reliability Index, commercial vehicle User Delay Costs, and commercial vehicle safety. The results indicate that while Louisiana’s Interstate system remained reliable over the years, some segments were found to be unreliable, which were annually less than 12% of the state’s Interstate system mileage. The User Delay Costs by commercial vehicles on these unreliable segments were, on average, 65.45% of the User Delay Cost by all vehicles on the Interstate highway system between 2016 and 2019, 53.10% between 2020 and 2021, and 70.36% in 2022, which are considerably high. These disproportionate ratios indicate the economic impact of the unreliability of the Interstate system on commercial vehicle operations. Additionally, though the annual crash frequencies remained relatively constant, an increasing proportion of commercial vehicles are involved in crashes, with segments (mileposts) that have high crash frequencies seeming to correspond with locations with recurring congestion on the Interstate highway system. The study highlights the potential of using data to identify areas that need improvement in transportation systems to support better decision-making.

Freight, Performance Measures, TTTR Index, Crash Rate, Data-Driven, User Delay Cost

Abedi, K. , Codjoe, J. , Thapa, R. and Gopu, V. (2023) Making Data-Driven Transportation Decisions for Freight Operations. Journal of Transportation Technologies, 13, 411-442. doi: 10.4236/jtts.2023.133020.