Open Journal of Business and Management

Volume 11, Issue 2 (March 2023)

ISSN Print: 2329-3284   ISSN Online: 2329-3292

Google-based Impact Factor: 1.13  Citations  

Influencer Marketing: Statistics and Skepticism

HTML  XML Download Download as PDF (Size: 480KB)  PP. 744-754  
DOI: 10.4236/ojbm.2023.112040    432 Downloads   2,955 Views  Citations
Author(s)

ABSTRACT

This paper analyzes how the influencer market has grown exponentially in the past several years and also how difficult it is to track the results of influencer marketing and advertising in general. Using data related to negative consumer impressions of traditional advertising features like pop-up ads and the untrustworthy review phenomenon and relating it to data about Generation Z’s modern opinions on social media marketing, I explain how influencer marketing is the better choice to appeal to a younger audience. Pseudo-social relationships are formed between the influencer and consumer and are reinforced by three attributes: physical attractiveness, social attractiveness, and attitude homophily. A successful influencer has balanced all three of these attributes to be balanced, in addition to a strong relation between the brands. While it is clear that the influence market is not a scam, it does require that brands have a certain level of skepticism and know their audience in order to find the most appropriate influencer to maximize the effect of their marketing.

Share and Cite:

Peng, C. (2023) Influencer Marketing: Statistics and Skepticism. Open Journal of Business and Management, 11, 744-754. doi: 10.4236/ojbm.2023.112040.

Cited by

No relevant information.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.