Sociology Mind

Volume 12, Issue 2 (April 2022)

ISSN Print: 2160-083X   ISSN Online: 2160-0848

Google-based Impact Factor: 0.30  Citations  

Against Dalits Reservation: Exploring the Views of So-Called Upper Caste Students Studying at Kailali Multiple Campus, Dhangadhi

HTML  XML Download Download as PDF (Size: 321KB)  PP. 58-75  
DOI: 10.4236/sm.2022.122004    164 Downloads   1,398 Views  
Author(s)

ABSTRACT

This research article aimed to explore why so-called upper-caste people, predominantly Brahman and Chhetri caste groups, are against 9% Dalit reservations, though the other five groups have reservations, like 33% women, 24% Aadibasi/Janajatis, 20% Madhesis, 5% people with disabilities, and 4% candidates from disadvantaged regions (people from disadvantaged districts in Karnali (basically to Khas Chhetris/Thakuris/Dalits), among others. The reservation has created some antipathy between so-called upper caste people and Dalits. The Supreme Court has also ordered a change in the existing reservation policy from a caste-based to a class-based system. In the midst of ambiguity, applied purposive sampling technique to gain detailed knowledge about a specific phenomenon with so-called upper-caste students studying at Kailai Multiple Campus in Dhangadhi Sub-Metropolitan City. Reservation is an important solution to Dalit prejudice in the present, but it does not solve “past” deprivation of religiously sidelined, socially oppressed, economically exploited, politically oppressed, and educationally deprived people. Compensation is the appropriate solution for the latter kind of discrimination. What more can be done within the current system to ensure Dalits’ access to state services if the reservations aren’t the solution to their problems?

Share and Cite:

Sunar, G. (2022) Against Dalits Reservation: Exploring the Views of So-Called Upper Caste Students Studying at Kailali Multiple Campus, Dhangadhi. Sociology Mind, 12, 58-75. doi: 10.4236/sm.2022.122004.

Cited by

No relevant information.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.