Author(s)

Ambrose Tochukwu Arinze¹, Ignatius Nnaemeka Onwuatuegwu²

¹Pope John Paul II Major Seminary Okpuno, Anambra, Nigeria.
²Philosophy Department, Faculty of Arts, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria.

Camus unreservedly condemned and strictly criticized and rejected suicide and existential leap because suicide is a total surrender to absurdity and a total confession that life is too much on the individual. His interest in existentialism is to explain the meaninglessness of life through his explication of the absurd which is found in human existence; and which continues to torment man until the finality of his existence which is death. The knowledge that life is absurd is already a step towards conquering the meaninglessness of life. For Camus therefore, since absurd has no meaning, man must hold himself apart from it and revolt against it. This is why he suggested philosophical suicide as a solution to reverse the absurdity of life. The question then is, since man’s belief in the absurdity of existence, then how and where should he direct his conduct, does suicide solve this problem? The consequences of Camus’ submissions are enormous; but be that as it may, this work attempts a study of the absurdity inherent in human existence with a view to answering the following questions: How far did Camus achieve the idea of absurdity of life? How realistic is Camus’ attempt to analyze life as meaningless apart from the meaning we give to it? Did Camus actually succeed in his attempt to show that life is absurd? Finally, what are the implications of Camus’ absurdity to philosophy and to life in general? This work will adopt expository and analytic methodological approaches. Here we shall with a detailed and deep reflective inquiry expose the place of absurdity in Camus’ philosophy in order to fully understand his understanding of life.

Absurdity, Meaninglessness, Reasoning, Futility, Revolt

Arinze, A. and Onwuatuegwu, I. (2020) The Notion of Absurdity and Meaning of Life in Albert Camus Existentialism. Open Journal of Philosophy, 10, 528-538. doi: 10.4236/ojpp.2020.104037.