[1]
|
A Meta-Analysis of Traditional Radial Access and Distal Radial Access in Transradial Access for Percutaneous Coronary Procedures
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine,
2023
DOI:10.1016/j.carrev.2022.09.006
|
|
|
[2]
|
Distal versus conventional radial artery access for coronary catheterization: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions,
2023
DOI:10.1002/ccd.30602
|
|
|
[3]
|
A Meta-Analysis of Traditional Radial Access and Distal Radial Access in Transradial Access for Percutaneous Coronary Procedures
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine,
2023
DOI:10.1016/j.carrev.2022.09.006
|
|
|
[4]
|
Emerging Perspectives of Anatomical snuff box in Invasive Cardiology
Journal of Geriatric Cardiology,
2023
DOI:10.26599/1671-5411.2023.03.006
|
|
|
[5]
|
Is transradial access optimal for any endovascular intervention?
Kardiologiya i serdechno-sosudistaya khirurgiya,
2023
DOI:10.17116/kardio202316051516
|
|
|
[6]
|
Distal Versus Proximal Radial Artery Access for Cardiac Catheterization: 30‐Day Outcomes of the DIPRA Study
Journal of the American Heart Association,
2023
DOI:10.1161/JAHA.123.030774
|
|
|
[7]
|
Distal Versus Proximal Radial Artery Access for Cardiac Catheterization and Intervention: Design and Rationale of the DIPRA Trial
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine,
2022
DOI:10.1016/j.carrev.2021.04.001
|
|
|
[8]
|
Distal snuffbox versus conventional radial artery access: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis
The Journal of Vascular Access,
2022
DOI:10.1177/11297298211005256
|
|
|
[9]
|
A meta-analysis of traditional radial access and distal radial access in transradial access for percutaneous coronary procedures
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine,
2022
DOI:10.1016/j.carrev.2022.09.006
|
|
|
[10]
|
Meta-Analysis Comparing Distal Radial Versus Traditional Radial Percutaneous Coronary Intervention or Angiography
The American Journal of Cardiology,
2022
DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.01.019
|
|
|
[11]
|
Distal versus conventional radial access for coronary angiography and intervention: Design and rationale of DISCO RADIAL study
American Heart Journal,
2022
DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2021.10.180
|
|
|
[12]
|
Distal Versus Proximal Radial Artery Access for Cardiac Catheterization and Intervention: Design and Rationale of the DIPRA Trial
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine,
2022
DOI:10.1016/j.carrev.2021.04.001
|
|
|
[13]
|
Meta-Analysis Comparing Distal Radial Versus Traditional Radial Percutaneous Coronary Intervention or Angiography
The American Journal of Cardiology,
2022
DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.01.019
|
|
|
[14]
|
Distal Radial Access
JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions,
2021
DOI:10.1016/j.jcin.2021.02.033
|
|
|
[15]
|
Distal Transradial Access in Anatomical Snuffbox for Coronary Angiography and Intervention: An Updated Meta-Analysis
Journal of Interventional Cardiology,
2021
DOI:10.1155/2021/7099044
|
|
|
[16]
|
Outcomes of distal versus conventional transradial access for coronary angiography and intervention: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis
International Journal of Cardiology,
2021
DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.10.003
|
|
|
[17]
|
Distal radial approach versus conventional radial approach: a comparative study of feasibility and safety
Libyan Journal of Medicine,
2021
DOI:10.1080/19932820.2020.1830600
|
|
|
[18]
|
Outcomes of distal versus conventional transradial access for coronary angiography and intervention: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis
International Journal of Cardiology,
2021
DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.10.003
|
|
|
[19]
|
Distal transradial access: a review of the feasibility and safety in cardiovascular angiography and intervention
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders,
2020
DOI:10.1186/s12872-020-01625-8
|
|
|
[20]
|
Distal versus conventional transradial artery access for coronary angiography and intervention: A meta-analysis
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine,
2020
DOI:10.1016/j.carrev.2020.03.020
|
|
|
[21]
|
Distal transradial access in the anatomical snuff box for coronary angiography and interventions
Cardiologia Croatica,
2020
DOI:10.15836/ccar2020.66
|
|
|