A Procedure for Diagnostically Modeling Extant Large-Scale Assessment Data: The Case of the Programme for International Student Assessment in Reading

Journals Menu

Follow SCIRP

	customer@scirp.org
	+86 18163351462(WhatsApp)
	1655362766

	Paper Publishing WeChat

Psychology

ISSN Print: 2152-7180
ISSN Online: 2152-7199
www.scirp.org/journal/psych
E-mail: psych@scirp.org

Citations

Journals Menu

"A Procedure for Diagnostically Modeling Extant Large-Scale Assessment Data: The Case of the Programme for International Student Assessment in Reading"
written by Jinsong Chen, Jimmy de la Torre,
published by Psychology, Vol.5 No.18, 2014

has been cited by the following article(s):

Google Scholar
CrossRef

[1]	Going Deep in Diagnostic Modeling: Deep Cognitive Diagnostic Models (DeepCDMs)
	Psychometrika, 2024

[2]	A General Mixture Model for Cognitive Diagnosis
	Journal of Educational and Behavioral …, 2024

[3]	Diagnosing students difficulties in solving mathematics test the TIMSS model at the number domain
	AIP Conference Proceedings, 2023

[4]	Diagnosing Primary Students' Reading Progression: Is Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing the Way Forward?
	Journal of Educational and Behavioral …, 2023

[5]	Vietnamese university EFL teachers' and students' beliefs and teachers' practices regarding classroom assessment
	Language Testing in Asia, 2023

[6]	基于随机森林的认知诊断 Q 矩阵修正
	心理技术与应用, 2023

[7]	認知診断モデルに基づく自動項目生成システムの妥当性検証-一次方程式の認知診断テストにおける事例研究
	行動計量学, 2023

[8]	The foundational math skills of Indian children
	Economics of Education Review, 2023

[9]	Utilizing The Competency-Based Strategic Intervention Materials As Tool To Assess Performance Of Students In Grade 9 Physical Education
	2022

[10]	Learning Latent and Hierarchical Structures in Cognitive Diagnosis Models
	Psychometrika, 2022

[11]	On the boundary problems in diagnostic classification models
	Behaviormetrika, 2022

[12]	Scalable Bayesian Approach for the Dina Q-Matrix Estimation Combining Stochastic Optimization and Variational Inference
	Psychometrika, 2022

[13]	Yan Li 1, Miaomiao Zhen 1 and Jia Liu2
	… Diagnostic Models: Methods …, 2022

[14]	Bayesian Analysis Methods for Two-Level Diagnosis Classification Models
	2022

[15]	Statistical Learning for Latent Attribute Models
	2022

[16]	Using Machine Learning to Identify Causes of Differential Item Functioning
	2022

[17]	On the Relationship Between Unidimensional Item Response Theory and Higher-Order Cognitive Diagnosis Models
	Essays on Contemporary Psychometrics, 2022

[18]	A cognitive diagnostic assessment of PISA math items: What skills have Canadian student mastered?
	2022

[19]	Going Deep in Diagnostic Modeling: DeepCDMs
	2021

[20]	Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment: Critical Review of Iranian Studies
	Journal of Applied Psychological …, 2021

[21]	Validating a Reading Assessment Within the Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment Framework: Q-Matrix Construction and Model Comparisons for Different …
	Frontiers in psychology, 2021

[22]	Analisis Diagnostik Kelemahan Mahasiswa Teknik Menguasai Materi Fungsi Trasenden Menggunakan Program R
	JURNAL PENDIDIKAN MIPA, 2021

[23]	سنجش‌شناختی تشخیصی: مرور انتقادی مطالعات ایرانی‎
	فصل‌نامه پژوهش‌های کاربردی روانشناختی, 2021

[24]	Validating a reading assessment within the cognitive diagnostic assessment framework: Q-matrix construction and model comparisons for different primary …
	Frontiers in Psychology, 2021

[25]	Balancing fit and parsimony to improve Q-matrix validation
	2021

[26]	The Validity of Using Diagnostic Classification Models for Criterion-Referenced Interpretations
	2021

[27]	Integrating diagnostic assessment into curriculum: a theoretical framework and teaching practices
	2021

[28]	Scalable Estimation Algorithm for the DINA Q-matrix Combining Stochastic Optimization and Variational Inference
	2021

[29]	Validating theoretical assumptions about reading with cognitive diagnosis models
	2021

[30]	Theoretical Analysis of the Relationship Between the Boundary Problem and Irregular Standard Errors in Diagnostic Classification Models
	2021

[31]	Retrofitting of Polytomous Cognitive Diagnosis and Multidimensional Item Response Theory Models
	2021

[32]	Variational Bayes inference algorithm for the saturated diagnostic classification model
	2020

[33]	Balancing fit and parsimony to improve Q‐matrix validation
	2020

[34]	CAF Profiles of Iranian Writers: What We Learn from Them and Their Limitations
	2020

[35]	Variational Bayesian inference for the multiple-choice DINA model
	2020

[36]	Variational Bayes inference for the DINA Model
	2020

[37]	A Gibbs Sampling Algorithm with Monotonicity Constraints for Diagnostic Classification Models
	2020

[38]	Incorporating Differential Speed in Cognitive Diagnostic Models with Polytomous Attributes
	2020

[39]	Cognitive diagnosis models and automated test assembly: an approach incorporating response times
	2020

[40]	Are You Smarter than a Fourth Grader? New Evidence on the Math Skills of Indian Children
	2020

[41]	Essays on Teacher Effectiveness and Student Learning in Less-Developed Countries
	2020

[42]	認知診断モデルにおけるモデル選択の比較: シミュレーションによる小サンプル状況下での検証
	2019

[43]	DINA モデルの再定式化と推定アルゴリズムの直接的導出
	日本テスト学会誌, 2019

[44]	Bilişsel tanı modellerinde data/q matris genişletme yönteminin örtük sınıf dağılımları üzerine etkisi
	2019

[45]	Multidimensional Item Response Theory
	2019

[46]	A diagnosis of difficulties in answering questions of circle material on junior high school students
	2019

[47]	A Nondiagnostic Assessment for Diagnostic Purposes: Q-Matrix Validation and Item-Based Model Fit Evaluation for the TIMSS 2011 Assessment
	2019

[48]	Applications of Diagnostic Classification Models: A Literature Review and Critical Commentary
	Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2018

[49]	Some Model Comparisons in Cognitive Diagnostic Models: Relatively Small Sample Situation with Simulation Study
	2018

[50]	Comparison among cognitive diagnostic models for the TIMSS 2007 fourth grade mathematics assessment
	PLOS ONE, 2018

[51]	What Learning Skills Have Canadian Students Mastered? A Cognitive Assessment of PISA data
	2018

[52]	認知診断モデルの理論的および経験的検討
	2018

[53]	Sekizinci Sınıf Öğrencilerinin TIMSS 2015 Matematik Başarılarının Bilişsel Tanı Modeli ile İncelenmesi
	2018

[54]	Lesekompetenz, curriculare Veränderungen und Übergang in die Berufsausbildung
	DISSERTATION, 2017

[55]	DINA 와 DINO 모형의 문항 모수 및 피험자 모수 추정 정확성에 영향을 주는 요인 탐색
	교육평가연구, 2017

[56]	Investigating Structures of Reading Comprehension Attributes at Different Proficiency Levels: Applying Cognitive Diagnosis Models and Factor Analyses
	2017

[57]	Lesekompetenz, curriculare Veränderungen und Übergang in die Berufsausbildung: Untersuchungen mit Daten des Nationalen Bildungspanels
	2017

[58]	Investigating Structures of Reading Comprehension Attributes at Different Proficiency Levels: Applying Cognitive Diagnostic Models and Factor Analyses
	2017

[59]	An efficient standard error estimator of the DINA model parameters when analysing clustered data
	International Journal of Quantitative Research in Education, 2017

[60]	Bilişsel Tanı Ve Çok Boyutlu Madde Tepki Kuramı Modellerinin Karşılıklı Uyumlarının İncelenmesi
	2017

[61]	近年の認知診断モデルの展開
	2017

[62]	Evaluating the effect of intelligent tutoring of structure strategy on students' reading ability using a cognitive diagnostic modeling approach
	2017

[63]	認知診断モデルにおけるモデル選択の比較
	2017

[1]	Bayesian Diagnostic Classification Models for a Partially Known Q-Matrix Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2025 DOI:10.3102/10769986241301055

[2]	Cognitive analysis and path construction of Chinese students’ mathematics cognitive process based on CDA Scientific Reports, 2025 DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-89000-5

[3]	Priority attribute algorithm for Q-matrix validation: A didactic Behavior Research Methods, 2024 DOI:10.3758/s13428-024-02547-5

[4]	Going Deep in Diagnostic Modeling: Deep Cognitive Diagnostic Models (DeepCDMs) Psychometrika, 2024 DOI:10.1007/s11336-023-09941-6

[5]	Accommodating and Extending Various Models for Special Effects Within the Generalized Partially Confirmatory Factor Analysis Framework Applied Psychological Measurement, 2024 DOI:10.1177/01466216241261704

[6]	A General Mixture Model for Cognitive Diagnosis Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2024 DOI:10.3102/10769986231176012

[7]	Regularized Bayesian algorithms for Q‐matrix inference based on saturated cognitive diagnosis modelling British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 2024 DOI:10.1111/bmsp.12368

[8]	Research on personalized assessment Information of students' mathematical competency based on cognitive diagnosis Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2024 DOI:10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101596

[9]	Going Deep in Diagnostic Modeling: Deep Cognitive Diagnostic Models (DeepCDMs) Psychometrika, 2024 DOI:10.1007/s11336-023-09941-6

[10]	A General Mixture Model for Cognitive Diagnosis Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2024 DOI:10.3102/10769986231176012

[11]	Validating an Automatic Item Generation System Based on a Cognitive Diagnostic Model Kodo Keiryogaku (The Japanese Journal of Behaviormetrics), 2023 DOI:10.2333/jbhmk.50.131

[12]	Validating an Automatic Item Generation System Based on a Cognitive Diagnostic Model Kodo Keiryogaku (The Japanese Journal of Behaviormetrics), 2023 DOI:10.2333/jbhmk.50.131

[13]	Vietnamese university EFL teachers’ and students’ beliefs and teachers’ practices regarding classroom assessment Language Testing in Asia, 2023 DOI:10.1186/s40468-023-00220-w

[14]	Bayesian Analysis Methods for Two-Level Diagnosis Classification Models Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2023 DOI:10.3102/10769986231173594

[15]	A General Mixture Model for Cognitive Diagnosis Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2023 DOI:10.3102/10769986231176012

[16]	Diagnosing students difficulties in solving mathematics test the TIMSS model at the number domain INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ON MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION (MSCEIS) 2021, 2023 DOI:10.1063/5.0155400

[17]	Bayesian Analysis Methods for Two-Level Diagnosis Classification Models Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2023 DOI:10.3102/10769986231173594

[18]	Diagnosing Primary Students’ Reading Progression: Is Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing the Way Forward? Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2023 DOI:10.3102/10769986231160668

[19]	Going Deep in Diagnostic Modeling: Deep Cognitive Diagnostic Models (DeepCDMs) Psychometrika, 2023 DOI:10.1007/s11336-023-09941-6

[20]	On the boundary problems in diagnostic classification models Behaviormetrika, 2023 DOI:10.1007/s41237-022-00187-7

[21]	Scalable Bayesian Approach for the Dina Q-Matrix Estimation Combining Stochastic Optimization and Variational Inference Psychometrika, 2023 DOI:10.1007/s11336-022-09884-4

[22]	Learning Latent and Hierarchical Structures in Cognitive Diagnosis Models Psychometrika, 2023 DOI:10.1007/s11336-022-09867-5

[23]	Essays on Contemporary Psychometrics Methodology of Educational Measurement and Assessment, 2023 DOI:10.1007/978-3-031-10370-4_20

[24]	Diagnosing Primary Students’ Reading Progression: Is Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing the Way Forward? Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2023 DOI:10.3102/10769986231160668

[25]	Diagnosing Primary Students’ Reading Progression: Is Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing the Way Forward? Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2023 DOI:10.3102/10769986231160668

[26]	Bayesian Analysis Methods for Two-Level Diagnosis Classification Models Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2023 DOI:10.3102/10769986231173594

[27]	Learning Latent and Hierarchical Structures in Cognitive Diagnosis Models Psychometrika, 2023 DOI:10.1007/s11336-022-09867-5

[28]	Scalable Bayesian Approach for the Dina Q-Matrix Estimation Combining Stochastic Optimization and Variational Inference Psychometrika, 2023 DOI:10.1007/s11336-022-09884-4

[29]	On the boundary problems in diagnostic classification models Behaviormetrika, 2022 DOI:10.1007/s41237-022-00187-7

[30]	A Gibbs Sampling Algorithm with Monotonicity Constraints for Diagnostic Classification Models Journal of Classification, 2022 DOI:10.1007/s00357-021-09392-7

[31]	Learning Latent and Hierarchical Structures in Cognitive Diagnosis Models Psychometrika, 2022 DOI:10.1007/s11336-022-09867-5

[32]	Scalable Bayesian Approach for the Dina Q-Matrix Estimation Combining Stochastic Optimization and Variational Inference Psychometrika, 2022 DOI:10.1007/s11336-022-09884-4

[33]	Integrating diagnostic assessment into curriculum: a theoretical framework and teaching practices Language Testing in Asia, 2021 DOI:10.1186/s40468-020-00117-y

[34]	Validating theoretical assumptions about reading with cognitive diagnosis models International Journal of Testing, 2021 DOI:10.1080/15305058.2021.1931238

[35]	Çok Kategorili Bilişsel Tanı ve Çok Boyutlu Madde Tepki Kuramı Modellerinin Karşılıklı Uyarlanması Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 2021 DOI:10.21031/epod.778861

[36]	Validating a Reading Assessment Within the Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment Framework: Q-Matrix Construction and Model Comparisons for Different Primary Grades Frontiers in Psychology, 2021 DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.786612

[37]	Integrating diagnostic assessment into curriculum: a theoretical framework and teaching practices Language Testing in Asia, 2021 DOI:10.1186/s40468-020-00117-y

[38]	Retrofitting of Polytomous Cognitive Diagnosis and Multidimensional Item Response Theory Models Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 2021 DOI:10.21031/epod.778861

[39]	Variational Bayesian inference for the multiple-choice DINA model Behaviormetrika, 2020 DOI:10.1007/s41237-020-00104-w

[40]	Variational Bayesian inference for the multiple-choice DINA model Behaviormetrika, 2020 DOI:10.1007/s41237-020-00104-w

[41]	Variational Bayesian inference for the multiple-choice DINA model Behaviormetrika, 2020 DOI:10.1007/s41237-020-00104-w

[42]	Cognitive diagnosis models and automated test assembly: an approach incorporating response times International Journal of Testing, 2020 DOI:10.1080/15305058.2020.1828427

[43]	Balancing fit and parsimony to improve Q‐matrix validation British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 2020 DOI:10.1111/bmsp.12228

[44]	The Assessment of L2 Written English across the MENA Region 2020 DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-53254-3_5

[45]	Variational Bayes Inference Algorithm for the Saturated Diagnostic Classification Model Psychometrika, 2020 DOI:10.1007/s11336-020-09739-w

[46]	Variational Bayes Inference Algorithm for the Saturated Diagnostic Classification Model Psychometrika, 2020 DOI:10.1007/s11336-020-09739-w

[47]	Variational Bayes Inference for the DINA Model Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2020 DOI:10.3102/1076998620911934

[48]	A Nondiagnostic Assessment for Diagnostic Purposes: Q-Matrix Validation and Item-Based Model Fit Evaluation for the TIMSS 2011 Assessment Sage Open, 2019 DOI:10.1177/2158244019832684

[49]	A Nondiagnostic Assessment for Diagnostic Purposes: Q-Matrix Validation and Item-Based Model Fit Evaluation for the TIMSS 2011 Assessment SAGE Open, 2019 DOI:10.1177/2158244019832684

[50]	Comparison among cognitive diagnostic models for the TIMSS 2007 fourth grade mathematics assessment PLOS ONE, 2018 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0188691

[51]	Applications of Diagnostic Classification Models: A Literature Review and Critical Commentary Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2018 DOI:10.1080/15366367.2018.1435104

[52]	Recent Developments in Cognitive Diagnostic Models Kodo Keiryogaku (The Japanese Journal of Behaviormetrics), 2017 DOI:10.2333/jbhmk.44.181

[53]	Analyzing Korean High School Students’ Reading Comprehension Profile Using Cognitive Diagnostic Model korean language education research, 2017 DOI:10.20880/kler.2017.52.2.213

Follow SCIRP

	customer@scirp.org
	+86 18163351462(WhatsApp)
	1655362766

	Paper Publishing WeChat

Psychology

Psychology

Journals Menu

Home

About SCIRP

Service

Policies