Author(s)

Michael Schleeger, Joachim Heberle, Sergej Kakorin

Department of Chemistry, Physical and Biophysical Chemistry, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Department of Molecular Spectroscopy, Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Mainz, Germany.
Department of Physics, Experimental Molecular Biophysics, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Conventional analysis of enzyme-catalyzed reactions uses a set of initial rates of product formation or substrate decay at a variety of substrate concentrations. Alternatively to the conventional methods, attempts have been made to use an integrated Michaelis-Menten equation to assess the values of the Michaelis-Menten K_M and turnover k_cat constants directly from a single time course of an enzymatic reaction. However, because of weak convergence, previous fits of the integrated Michaelis-Menten equation to a single trace of the reaction have no proven records of success. Here we propose a reliable method with fast convergence based on an explicit solution of the Michaelis-Menten equation in terms of the Lambert-W function with transformed variables. Tests of the method with stopped-flow measurements of the catalytic reaction of cytochrome c oxidase, as well as with simulated data, demonstrate applicability of the approach to de termine K_M and k_cat constants free of any systematic errors. This study indicates that the approach could be an alternative solution for the characterization of enzymatic reactions, saving time, sample and efforts. The single trace method can greatly assist the real time monitoring of enzymatic activity, in particular when a fast control is mandatory. It may be the only alternative when conventional analysis does not apply, e.g. because of limited amount of sample.

Cytochrome c Oxidase; Enzyme Kinetics; Enzymes; Lambert-W Function; Michaelis-Menten Model

M. Schleeger, J. Heberle and S. Kakorin, "Simplifying the Analysis of Enzyme Kinetics of Cytochrome c Oxidase by the Lambert-W Function," Open Journal of Biophysics, Vol. 2 No. 4, 2012, pp. 117-129. doi: 10.4236/ojbiphy.2012.24015.