A Towering Critique of the Ambience of Social Welfare, Social Work and the Social Development Paradigm—An African Analysis

Ani Casimir¹, Ejiofor Samuel²

¹Department of Philosophy, Institute of African Studies, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria.
²Department of Social Work, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria.

DOI: 10.4236/ojps.2015.54025                

Abstract

What should be the African social worker in the modern world. The African social worker has discovered that most clinical and other modern social work practices are Euro-centric. And only reflect only European values. He knows that African communal social work practices existed in an ethnocentric environment that encourages an African-centred world view. How this African centred world view wouyld help him to define a new social work values with a paradigmatic shift to his roles as a profession is a challenge to both social philosophy and its social work concentrates. Therefore this article raises serious concerns about the ethnocentric nature of existing paradigms within the social sciences that form the basis for social work theory and practice with implications for modern social work in Africa. In addition, it highlights the theoretical deficits within existing social work models that do not reflect the worldviews of diverse cultural communities in modern world. Can existing social work models continue to express ethnocentric value systems as the universal way to explain human behaviour in the light of growing demands for pluralism not only between groups but also between epistemologies and worldviews? The authors of the article, writing from the perspective of the new African social science, argues for an alternative paradigm that is grounded in the cultural and historical reality of the African communal experience.

Keywords

Social Philosophy, Ambience, Social Work, Social Welfare, African World View, Communalism and Social Development

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of Meaning. London: Harvard University Press.
[2]	Chambon, A., Irving, A., & Epstein, L. (1999). Reading Foucault for Social Work. New York: Columbia University Press.
[3]	Cross, T. L. et al. (1989). Towards a Culturally Competent System of Care. Washington DC: CASSP Technical Assistance Center.
[4]	Foucault, M. (1980). Power-Knowledge. New York: Pantheon.
[5]	Gergen, K. J. (2001). Social Construction in Context. London: Sage Publications.
[6]	Gergen, K. J., & Gergen, M. (2004). Social Construction: Entering the Dialogue. Chagrin Falls, OH: Taos Institute Publications.
[7]	Júlíusdóttir, S. (2004). Theorizing Practice—Target and Tools in the Transformation Process. Nordic Conference for Social Work Education, SSKH Konferencerapport Not. 1/2004, 31-47.
[8]	Júlíusdóttir, S. (2006). The Emerging Paradigm Shift in Social Work—In the Context of the Current Reforms of European Social Work Education. Vol. 12, No. 2 (2014) Special Issue: Creating Capabilities for Socially Vulnerable Youth in Europe.
[9]	Júlíusdóttir, S., & Karlsson, T. (2006). Some Indications for Professional Development in Social Work: A Study of Theoretical Orientation and Attitudes to Research among Icelandic Social Workers. European Journal of Social Work. http://www.socwork.net/SWstandardsnortheuropev2.0(Petersson-Dottir2003).pdf .
[10]	Kuhn, T. (1980). The Structure of Scientific Revolution. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
[11]	Lindeman-Nelson, H. (2001). Damaged Identities. Narrative Repair, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
[12]	Mekada, J. G. (2013). The African-Centred Worldview: Developing a Paradigm for Social Work. British Journal of Social Work, 29, 251-267.
[13]	Merriam-Webster (1900). http://www.merriam-webster.com/info/
[14]	Watzlawick, P., Weakland, J. H., & Fisch, R. (1974). Change: Principles of Problem Formation and Problem Solution. New York: W.W. Norton.
[15]	Weber, T. (2006). Gandhi, Gandhism and the Gandhians. Delhi: Roli Books Pvt. Ltd.