Share This Article:

The False Problem of the Maintenance of Sex (Review of the Original Approach)

Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:2855KB) PP. 3135-3155
DOI: 10.4236/am.2014.519297    4,424 Downloads   4,955 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

We analyze here the keys of the original approach about the twofold cost: the return to the asexuality starting with a mutant female, with the same reproductive capacity than a sexual one, and with double genetic-reproductive success. We propose a new approach in which 1) all individuals in a population have regulatory mechanisms of reproductive mode, and when such change occurs, it happens in all its population at the same time; 2) after a change of reproductive mode in the population there can be variations in average offspring per female, according to the environmental quality; and 3) the genetic-reproductive success of the males and its unequal paternity success are accounted for. Results: The most advantageous reproductive strategy depends on the demographic situation of the population and the degree of the unequal paternity success of males. For harem values observed in nature and in populations with moderate growth rate, stable or decreasing population, the sexual strategy is advantageous. If the population growth rate is high, the asexual strategy is advantageous. In species subject to high demographic fluctuations the best strategy depends on the ability to predict the time of occurrence of the population bottleneck: if predictable, the best strategy is the alternation of generations, if not, permanent parthenogenesis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Mancebo Quintana, J. (2014) The False Problem of the Maintenance of Sex (Review of the Original Approach). Applied Mathematics, 5, 3135-3155. doi: 10.4236/am.2014.519297.

References

[1] Smith, J.M. (1971) The Origin and Maintenance of Sex. In: Williams, G.C., Ed., Group Selection, Aldine-Atherton, Chicago, 163-175.
[2] Smith, J.M. (1978) The Evolution of Sex. Cambridge University Press, Oxford.
[3] Williams, G.C. (1975) Sex and Evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
[4] Smith, J.M. (1971) What Use Is Sex? Journal of Theoretical Biology, 30, 319-335.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(71)90058-0
[5] Bell, G. (1982) The Masterpiece of Nature: The Evolution and Genetics of Sexuality. University of California Press, Berkeley.
[6] Otto, S.P. and Lenormand, T. (2002) Resolving the Paradox of Sex and Recombination. Nature Reviews Genetics, 3, 252-261.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg761
[7] Lehtonen, J., Jennions, M.D. and Kokko, H. (2012) The Many Costs of Sex. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 27, 172-178.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.09.016
[8] Otto, S.P. (2009) The Evolutionary Enigma of Sex. The American Naturalist, 174, S1-S14.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/599084
[9] Muller, H.J. (1964) The Relation of Recombination to Mutational Advance. Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis, 1, 2-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0027-5107(64)90047-8
[10] Hamilton, W.D., Axelrod, R. and Tanese, R. (1990) Sexual Reproduction as an Adaptation to Resist Parasites (a Review). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 87, 3566-3573.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.9.3566
[11] Kondrashov, A.S. (1993) Classification of Hypotheses on the Advantage of Amphimixis. Journal of Heredity, 84, 372-387.
[12] Otto, S.P. and Gerstein, A.C. (2006) Why Have Sex? The Population Genetics of Sex and Recombination. Biochemical Society Transactions, 43, 519-522.
[13] Birky, C.W. (1996) Heterozygosity, Heteromorphy, and Phylogenetic Tress in Asexual Eukaryotes. Genetics, 144, 427-437.
[14] Barton, N.H. and Charlesworth, B. (1998) Why Sex and Recombination? Science, 281, 1986-1990.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.281.5385.1986
[15] Vrijenhoek, R.C. (1998) Clonal Organisms and the Benefits of Sex. In: Advances in Molecular Ecology, IOS Press, Amsterdam, 151-172.
[16] Birky, C.W., Wolf, C., Maughan, H., Herbertson, L. and Henry, E. (2005) Speciation and Selection without Sex. Hydrobiologia, 546, 29-45.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-005-4097-2
[17] Quintana, J.M.M. and Quintana, S.M. (2012) A Short-Term Advantage for Syngamy in the Origin of Eukaryotic Sex: Effects of Cell Fusion on Cell Cycle Duration and Other Effects Related to the Duration of the Cell Cycle—Relationship between Cell Growth Curve and the Optimal Size of the Species, and Circadian Cell Cycle in Photosynthetic Unicellular Organisms. International Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 2012, Article ID: 746825.
[18] Parker, G.A., Baker, R.R. and Smith, V.G.F. (1972) The Origin and Evolution of Gamete Dimorphism and the Male-Female Phenomenon. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 36, 529-553.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(72)90007-0
[19] Simon, J.C., Rispe, C. and Sunnucks, P. (2002) Ecology and Evolution of Sex in Aphids. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 17, 34-39.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02331-X
[20] Smith, J.M. (1972) Game Theory and the Evolution of Fighting. In: On Evolution, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
[21] Smith, J.M. and Price, G. (1973) The Logic of Animal Conflict. Nature, 246, 15-18.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/246015a0
[22] Lack, D. (1954) The Natural Regulation of Animal Numbers. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
[23] Cody, M. (1966) A General Theory of Clutch Size. Evolution, 20, 174-184.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2406571
[24] Perrins, C. (1965) Population Fluctuations and Clutch Size in the Great Tit, Parus major L. Journal of Animal Ecology, 34, 601-647.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2453
[25] Wolinska, J. and Lively, C.M. (2008) The Cost of Males in Daphnia pulex. Oikos, 117, 1637-1646.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2008.16760.x
[26] Innes, D.J., Fox, C.J. and Winsor, G.L. (2000) Avoiding the Cost of Males in Obligately Asexual Daphnia pulex (Leydig). Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 267, 991-997.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2000.1101
[27] Loyning, M.K. (2000) Reproductive Performance of Clonal and Sexual Bark Beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in the Field. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 13, 743-748.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.2000.00227.x
[28] Morgan-Richards, M., Trewick, S.A. and Stringer, I.A.N. (2010) Geographic Parthenogenesis and the Common Tea-Tree Stick Insect of New Zealand. Molecular Ecology, 19, 1227-1238.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04542.x
[29] Schlupp, I., Taebel-Hellwig, A. and Tobler, M. (2010) Equal Fecundity in Asexual and Sexual Mollies (Poecilia). Environmental Biology of Fishes, 88, 201-206.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10641-010-9630-0
[30] Jokela, J., Lively, C.M., Dybdahl, M.F. and Fox, J.A. (1997) Evidence for a Cost of Sex in the Freshwater Snail Potamopyrgus antipodarum. Ecology, 78, 452-460.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[0452:EFACOS]2.0.CO;2
[31] Bateman, A.J. (1948) Intra-Sexual Selection in Drosophila. Heredity, 2, 349-368.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1948.21
[32] Clutton-Brock, T. (2007) Sexual Selection in Males and Females. Science, 318, 1882-1885.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1133311
[33] Hadany, L. and Beker, T. (2007) Sexual Selection and the Evolution of Obligatory Sex. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 7, 245.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-7-245
[34] Vrijenhoek, R.C. (1998) Animal Clones and Diversity. BioScience, 48, 617-628.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1313421
[35] Wade, M.J. and Shuster, S.M. (2004) Sexual Selection: Harem Size and the Variance in Male Reproductive Success. The American Naturalist, 164, E83-E89.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/424531
[36] Bulmer, M. (1982) Cyclical Parthenogenesis and the Cost of Sex. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 94, 197-207.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(82)90341-1
[37] Rispe, C. and Pierre, J. (1998) Coexistence between Cyclical Parthenogens, Obligate Parthenogens, and Intermediates in a Fluctuating Environment. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 195, 97-110.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.1998.0784
[38] Moran, N. (1992) The Evolution of Aphid Life Cycles. Annual Review of Entomology, 37, 321-348.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.37.010192.001541
[39] De Meester, L., Gomez, A. and Simon, J. (2004) Evolutionary and Ecological Genetics of Cyclical Parthenogens. In: Evolution: From Molecules to Ecosystems, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
[40] Hills, F.J. (1982) Sugarbeet Pest Management: Aphid-Borne Viruses. University of California, Oakland.
[41] Marcovitch, S. (1924) The Migration of the Aphididae and the Appearance of the Sexual Forms as Affected by the Relative Length of Daily Light Exposure. Journal of Agricultural Research, 27, 513-522.
[42] Schaible, R., Bergmann, I. and Schubert, H. (2009) A Survey of Sexually Reproducing Female and Male Populations of Chara canescens (Charophyta) in the National Park Neusiedler See-Seewinkel. Cryptogamie, Algologie, 30, 279-294.
[43] Glesener, R.R. and Tilman, D. (1978) Sexuality and the Components of Environmental Uncertainty: Clues from Geographic Parthenogenesis in Terrestrial Animals. The American Naturalist, 112, 659-673.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/283308
[44] Lynch, M. (1984) Destabilizing Hybridization, General-Purpose Genotypes and Geographic Parthenogenesis. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 59, 257-288.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/413902
[45] Parker, E.D.J. (2002) Geographic Parthenogenesis in Terrestrial Invertebrates: Generalist or Specialist Clones? In: Progress in Asexual Propagation and Reproductive Strategies, Oxford-IBH, Oxford, 93-114.
[46] Vrijenhoek, R.C. and Parker Jr., E.D. (2009) Geographical Parthenogenesis: General Purpose Genotypes and Frozen Niche Variation. In: Lost Sex. The Evolutionary Biology of Parthenogenesis, Springer, Berlin, 99-131.
[47] Baker, H.G. (1965) Characteristics and Modes of Origin of Weeds. In: Genetics of Colonizing Species, Academic Press, New York, 147-172.
[48] Tomlinson, J. (1966) The Advantage of Hermaphroditism and Parthenogenesis. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 11, 54-58.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(66)90038-5
[49] Hamilton, W., Henderson, P. and Moran, N. (1981) Fluctuation of Environmental and Coevolved Antagonist Polymorphism as Factors in the Maintenance of Sex. In: Natural Selection and Social Behavior, Chiron Press, New York, 363-381.
[50] Paulissen, M.A., Walker, J.M. and Cordes, J.E. (1988) Ecology of Syntopic Clones of the Parthenogenetic Whiptail Lizard, Cnemidophorus laredoensis. Journal of Herpetology, 22, 331-342.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1564157
[51] Vrijenhoek, R.C. (1985) Animal Population Genetics and Disturbance: The Effects of Local Extinctions and Recolonizations on Heterozygosity and Fitness. In: The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics, Academic Press, New York, 265-285.
[52] Haag, C.R. and Ebert, D. (2004) A New Hypothesis to Explain Geographic Parthenogenesis. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 41, 539-544.
[53] Frantz, A., Plantegenest, M. and Simon, J.C. (2006) Temporal Habitat Variability and the Maintenance of Sex in Host Populations of the Pea Aphid. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 22, 2887-2891.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.3665
[54] Kondrashov, A.S. (1988) Deleterious Mutations and the Evolution of Sexual Reproduction. Nature, 336, 435-440.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/336435a0
[55] Hadany, L. and Becker, T. (2003) On the Evolutionary Advantage of Fitness-Associated Recombination. Genetics, 165, 2167-2179.
[56] Randerson, J.P. and Hurst, L.D. (2001) The Uncertain Evolution of the Sexes. Ecology & Evolution, 16, 571-579.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02270-4
[57] Cullum, A.J. (1997) Comparisons of Physiological Performance in Sexual and Asexual Whiptail Lizards (Genus Cnemidophorus): Implications for the Role of Heterozygosity. The American Naturalist, 150, 24-47.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/286055
[58] Mee, J.A. and Rowe, L. (2006) A Comparison of Parasite Loads on Asexual and Sexual Phoxinus (Pisces: Cyprinidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 84, 808-816.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/z06-064
[59] Stelzer, C.P. (2011) The Cost of Sex and Competition between Cyclical and Obligate Parthenogenetic Rotifers. The American Naturalist, 177, E43-E53.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/657685
[60] Weeks, S.C. (1995) Comparisons of Life-History Traits between Clonal and Sexual Fish (Poeciliopsis: Poeciliidae) Raised in Monoculture and Mixed Treatments. Evolutionary Ecology, 9, 258-274.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01237772
[61] Crummett, L.T. and Wayne, M.L. (2009) Comparing Fecundity in Parthenogenetic versus Sexual Populations of the Freshwater Snail Campeloma limum: Is There a Two-Fold Cost of Sex? Invertebrate Biology, 128, 1-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7410.2008.00150.x
[62] Congdon, J.D., Vitt, L.J. and Hadley, N.F. (1978) Parental Investment: Comparative Reproductive Energetics in Bisexual and Unisexual Lizards Genus Cnemidophorus. The American Naturalist, 112, 509-521.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/283293
[63] Scheiner, S.M. and Yampolsk, L.Y. (1998) The Evolution of Daphnia pulex in a Temporally Varying Environment. Genetical Research, 72, 25-37.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0016672398003322
[64] Roth, L.M. (1974) Reproductive Potential of Bisexual Pycnoscelus indicus and Clones of Its Parthenogenetic Relative Pycnoscelus surinamensis. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 67, 215-223.
[65] Lamb, R.Y. and Willey, R.B. (1979) Are Parthenogenetic and Related Bisexual Insects Equal in Fertility? Evolution, 33, 774-775.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2407801
[66] Kramer, M.G. and Templeton, A.R. (2001) Life-History Changes That Accompany the Transition from Sexual to Parthenogenetic Reproduction in Drosophila mercatorum. Evolution, 55, 748-761.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1554/0014-3820(2001)055[0748:LHCTAT]2.0.CO;2
[67] Kearney, M. and Shine, R. (2005) Lower Fecundity in Parthenogenetic Geckos than Sexual Relatives in the Australian Arid Zone. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 18, 609-618.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00866.x
[68] Uzzel, T.M. (1964) Relations of the Diploid and Triploid Species of the Ambystoma jeffersonianum Complex (Amphibia, Caudata). Copeia, 1964, 257-300.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1441023
[69] Weinzierl, R.P., Schmidt, P. and Michiels, N.K. (1999) High Fecundity and Low Fertility in Parthenogenetic Planarians. Invertebrate Biology, 118, 87-94.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3227051
[70] Lynch, M. (1989) The Distribution of Life-History Variation in the Daphnia pulex Complex. Evolution, 43, 1724-1736.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2409388
[71] Domes, K., Scheu, S. and Maraun, M. (2007) Resources and Sex: Soil Re-Colonization by Sexual and Parthenogenetic Oribatid Mites. Pedobiologia, 51, 1-11.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pedobi.2006.11.001
[72] Enghoff, H. (1976) Parthenogenesis and Bisexuality in the Millipede Nemasoma varicorne C.L. Kock, 1847 (Diplopoda: Blaniulidae). Morphological, Ecological, and Biogeographical Aspects. Videnskabelige Meddelelser Dansk Naturhistorisk Forening, 139, 21-59.
[73] Corley, L.S. and Moore, A.J. (1999) Fitness of Alternative Modes of Reproduction: Developmental Constraints and the Evolutionary Maintenance of Sex. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Biological Sciences, 266, 471-176.
[74] Trivers, R.L. (1972) Parental Investment and Sexual Selection. In: Campbell, B., Ed., Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, Aldine Press, Chicago, 136-179.
[75] Trivers, R.L. (1976) Sexual Selection and Resource-Accruing Abilities in Anolis garmani. Evolution, 30, 253-269.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2407700
[76] Siller, S. (2001) Sexual Selection and the Maintenance of Sex. Nature, 411, 689-692.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35079578
[77] Atmar, W. (1991) On the Role of Males. Animal Behaviour, 41, 195-205.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80471-3
[78] Koeslag, P.D. and Koeslag, J.H. (1994) Koinophilia Stabilizes Bi-Gender Sexual Reproduction against Asexual in an Unchanging Environment. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 166, 251-260.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.1994.1023
[79] Kodric-Brown, A. and Brown, J.H. (1987) Anisogamy, Sexual Selection, and the Evolution and Maintenance of Sex. Evolutionary Ecology, 1, 95-105.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02067393
[80] Manning, J.T. (1984) Males and the Advantage of Sex. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 108, 215-220.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5193(84)80067-3
[81] Lorch, P.D., Proulx, S., Rowe, L. and Day, T. (2003) Condition-Dependent Sexual Selection Can Accelerate Adaptation. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 6, 867-881.
[82] Proulx, S.R. (2002) Niche Shifts and Expansion Due to Sexual Selection. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 3, 351-369.
[83] Whitlock, M.C. (2000) Fixation of New Alleles and the Extinction of Small Populations: Drift Load, Beneficial Alleles, and Sexual Selection. Evolution, 54, 1855-1861.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb01232.x
[84] Marshall, S.M. and Orr, A.P. (1955) The Biology of a Marinc Copepod, Calanus finmarchicus (Gunnerus), Oliver and Boyd.
[85] Comita, G.W. and Comita, J.J. (1966) Egg Production in Tigriopus brevicornis. In: Some Contemporary Studies in Marine Science, Allen and Unwin, 171-185.
[86] Lack, D. (1947) The Significance of Clutch-Size. Ibis, 89, 302-352.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.1947.tb04155.x
[87] Lack, D. (1948) The Significance of Clutch-Size. Part III. Some Interspecific Comparisons. Ibis, 90, 25-45.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.1948.tb01399.x
[88] Klomp, H. (1970) The Determinatio of Clutch-Size in Birds. A Review. Ardea, 58, 1-124.
[89] Bengtson, S.A. (1971) Variations in Clutch-Size in Ducks in Relation to the Food Supply. Ibis, 113, 523-526.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.1971.tb05190.x
[90] Högstedt, G. (1981) Effect of Additional Food on Reproductive Success in the Magpie (Pica pica). Journal of Animal Ecology, 50, 219-229.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4041
[91] Arcese, P. and Smitht, J.N.M. (1988) Effects of Population Density and Supplemental Food on Reproduction in Song Sparrows. Journal of Animal Ecology, 57, 119-136.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4768
[92] Zanette, L., Clinchy, M. and Smith, J.N.M. (2006) Food and Predators Affect Egg Production in Song Sparrows. Ecology, 87, 2459-2467.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2459:FAPAEP]2.0.CO;2
[93] Tannerfeldt, M. and Angerbjörn, A. (1998) Fluctuating Resources and the Evolution of Litter Size in the Arctic Fox. Oikos, 545-559, 83.
[94] Karels, T.J., Byrom, A.E., Boonstra, R. and Krebs, C.J. (2000) The Interactive Effects of Food and Predators on Reproduction and Overwinter Survival of Arctic Ground Squirrels. Journal of Animal Ecology, 69, 235-247.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2000.00387.x
[95] Teixeira, P.F., Kaminski, S.M., Avila, T.R., Cardozo, A.P., Bersano, J.G.F. and Bianchini, A. (2010) Diet Influence on Egg Production of the Copepod Acartia tonsa (Dana, 1896). Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 82, 333-339.
[96] Glazier, D.S. (1992) Effects of Food, Genotype, and Maternal Size and Age on Offspring Investment in Daphnia magna. Ecology, 73, 910-926.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1940168
[97] Checkley Jr., D.M. (1980) The Egg Production of a Marine Planktonic Copepod in Relation to Its Food Supply: Laboratory Studies. Limnology and Oceanography, 25, 430-446.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4319/lo.1980.25.3.0430

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.