Under vs. over Primary Control Discrepancies and Their Relationships to Well-Being in a Primary Control Culture
Orrie Dan
.
DOI: 10.4236/psych.2011.25068   PDF    HTML     5,811 Downloads   9,406 Views   Citations

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between “under” and “over” cultural self discrepancy, and the individual’s well-being. “Under cultural self discrepancy” occurs when the individual expects that s/he would fail to behave in specific situations in accordance with the culture norms. In “over cultural self discrepancy” the individual expects to over react and exaggerate the expected behavior. The hypothesis of this paper is that in a culture that emphasizes primary control, “under cultural discrepancy” would be negatively correlated with well being, while “over cultural discrepancy” would not be. To that end, four equstionnaires were adiminstered to130 first-year, Israeli Psychology undergraduates: The Primary and Secondary Control Dilemmas Questionnaire; Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale; Depressive Experiences Questionnaire; and Trait Anxiety Inventory. The results clearly demonstrate that “under primary control self discrepancy” correlates negatively with well being, while “over primary control self discrepancy” does not. Since Israeli culture emphasizes primary control, these results support the hypothesis that “under cultural self discrepancy” is negatively correlated with well being, while “over cultural self discrepancy” is not in such cultures.

Share and Cite:

Dan, O. (2011). Under vs. over Primary Control Discrepancies and Their Relationships to Well-Being in a Primary Control Culture. Psychology, 2, 440-444. doi: 10.4236/psych.2011.25068.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Aronson, E. (1992). The return of the repressed: Dissonance theory makes a comeback. Psychological Inquiry, 3, 303-311. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0304_1
[2] Azuma, H. (1984). Secondary control as heterogeneous category. American Psychologist, 39, 970-971. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.39.9.970
[3] Blaney, P. H, & Kutcher, G. S. (1991). Measures of depressive dimensions: Are they interchangeable? Journal of Personality Assessment, 56, 502-512. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa5603_11
[4] Blatt, S. J., Quinlan, D. M., & Da’fflitti, J. P. (1979) Depressive Experiences Questionnaire. Unpublished manual, New Haven, CT: Yale University.
[5] Cross, S. E., Gore, J. S., & Morris, M. L. (2003). The relational- interdependent self-construal, self-concept consistency, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 933-944. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.933
[6] Donahue, E. M., Robins, R. W., Roberts, B. W., & John, O. P. (1993). The divided self: Concurrent and longitudinal effects of psychological adjustment and social roles on self-concept differentiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 834-846. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.5.834
[7] Essau, C. (1992). Primary-secondary control and coping. Regensburg: S. Roderer Verlag.
[8] Elkin, R. A., & Leippe, M. R. (1986). Physiological arousal, dissonance, and attitude change: Evidence for a dissonance-arousal link and a “Don’t remind me” effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 55-65. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.1.55
[9] Elliot, A. J., Devine, P. G. (1994). On the motivational nature of cognitive dissonance: Dissonance as psychological discomfort. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 382-394. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.3.382
[10] Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Oxford, England: Stanford University Press.
[11] Grob, A., Flammer, A., & Wearing, A. J. (1995). Adolesccents’ perceived control: domain specifity, expectations, and appraisal. Journal of Adolescence, 18, 403-425. doi:10.1006/jado.1995.1030
[12] Goldsmith, R. E. (1986). Dimensionality of the Rosenberg self esteem scale. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 1, 253-264.
[13] Harmon-Jones, E., Brehm, J.W., Greenberg, J., Simon, L., & Nelson, D E. (1996). Evidence that the production of aversive consequences is not necessary to create cognitive dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 5-16. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.1.5
[14] Heckhausen, J., Wrosch, C., & Fleeson, W. (2001). Developmental regulation before and after a developmental deadline: The sample case of “biological clock” for childbearing. Psychology and Aging, 16, 400-413. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.16.3.400
[15] Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self–discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319-340. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.319
[16] Kurman, J., Dan, O. (2007). Unpackaging cross-cultural differences in initiation between Israeli subgroups: Tradition and control orientations as mediating factors. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 581-594. doi:10.1177/0022022107305240
[17] Losch, M. E., Cacioppo, J. T. (1990). Cognitive dissonance may enhance sympathetic tonus, but attitudes are changed to reduce negative affect rather than arousal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 289-304. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(90)90040-S
[18] Mesquita, B., Frijda, N. H., Scherer, K. R. (1997). Culture and emotion. In J. W. Berry, P. R. Dasen and T. S. Saraswathi (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology. Vol. 2: Basic processes and human development (pp. 255-297). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
[19] Miller, D. T., & Prentice, D. A. (1996). The construction of social norms and standards. In E. T. Higgins and A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 799-829). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
[20] Morling, B., & Evered, S. (2006). Secondary control reviewed and defined. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 269-296. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.269
[21] Rogers, C. R. (1951). Client-centered therapy: Its current practice, implications, and theory. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
[22] Rogers, C. R. & Dymond, R. F. (1954). Psychotherapy and personality change. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
[23] Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self image. Princeston, New Jersey: Princeston University Press.
[24] Rothbaum, F. M., Weisz, J. R., & Snyder, S. S. (1982). Changing the world and changing the self: A two-process model of perceived control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 5-37. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.5
[25] Rydell, R. J., McConnell, A. R., & Mackie, D. M.(2008). Consequences of discrepant explicit and implicit attitudes: Cognitive dissonance and increased information processing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1526-1532. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.07.006
[26] Sanderson, C. A., Wallier, J. M., Stockdale, J. E., & Yopyk, D. J. A. (2008). Who feels discrepant and how does feeling discrepant matter? Examining the presence and consequences of feeling discrepant from personal and social norms related to thinness in America and British high school girls. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 27, 995-1020. doi:10.1521/jscp.2008.27.9.995
[27] Schachter, S. (1951). Deviation, rejection, and communication. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 190-207. doi:10.1037/h0062326
[28] Scherer, K. R. (1997). The role of culture in emotion-antecedent appraisal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 902-922. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.5.902
[29] Seginer, R. Trommsdorff, G. & Essau, C. A. (1993) Adolescent control beliefs: Cross-cultural variations of primary and secondary orientations. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 16, 243- 260.
[30] Seginer, R. (1998). Primary and secondary control in interpersonal and cultural settings. In G. Trommsdorff, W. Friedlmeier, H.-J. Kornadt (Eds.), Japan in transition (pp. 183-197). Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers.
[31] Sheldon, K. M., Ryan, R. M. Rawsthorne, L. J., & Ilardi, B. (1997). Trait self and true self: Cross-role variation in the Big-Five personality traits and its relations with psychological authenticity and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1380-1393. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1380
[32] Spielberger, C.D. (1983). Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory (form Y). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
[33] Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2004). The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. Key readings in social psychology. In J. T. Jost and J. Sidanius, (Eds.), Political psychology: Key readings, Key readings in social psychology (pp. 276-293). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
[34] Tangney, J. P., Niedenthal, P. M., Covert, M. V., & Barlow, D. H. (1998). Are shame and guilt related to distinct self-discrepancies? A test of Higgins’s (1987) hypotheses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 256-268. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.256
[35] Tromsdorff, G. & Friedlmeier, W. (1993). Control and responsiveness in Japanese and German mother—child interactions. Early Development and Parenting, 2, 65-78.
[36] Viglione, D. J, Clemmey, P. A., & Camenzuli, L. (1990). The Depressive Experiences Questionnaire: A critical review. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55, 52-64. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa5501&2_6
[37] Watson, N., Bryan, B. C., & Thrash, T. M. (2010). Self-Discrepancy: Comparisons of the Psychometric Properties of Three Instruments. Psychological Assessment, 22, 878-92. doi:10.1037/a0020644
[38] Weisz, J. R., Rothbaum, F. M., & Blackburn, T. C. (1984). Standing out and standing in: The psychology of control in America and Japan. American Psychlogist, 39, 955-969. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.39.9.955
[39] Wrosch, C., & Heckhausen, J. (1999). Control processes before and after passing a developmental deadline: Activation and deactivation of intimate relationship goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 415-427. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.2.415

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.