Share This Article:

Utopianism and the New World Order: A Critical Consideration

Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:2540KB) PP. 332-344
DOI: 10.4236/ojpp.2014.43037    2,367 Downloads   2,744 Views  
Author(s)    Leave a comment

ABSTRACT

Utopianism, which has been inveigled in various circles into epistemological obscurity, has been the force behind several socio-political and economic reforms of many generations. Scholars accredit religious thoughts as the purveyor of the messianic utopianism, while classical utopianism is accredited to Plato and Aristotle. However,Thomas Moore coined the word utopia and furthered the concept in the modern times. Overly, the power of utopian thinking lies in the strength of imaginative thought. Thus utopianism is christened idealism and dismissed as irrelevant to real life experiences of the modern man. However, the works of Thomas Moore, on the contrary, have thrown hindsight to the fact that utopian thoughts are relevant both for the spiritual and material worlds. Here, utopian thinking serves as a critique to the ineptitude of the utopianist’s society. Utopia becomes a means of addressing the evils of the society in which the utopian lives(d). In the works of Thomas Moore, the imaginary city of utopia becomes an ideal state, where all the citizens live in peace and harmony, contrary to the European society of Moore’s time, where oppression, war and social disorder were the dicta. Against this backdrop, this paper found epistemological connection between Moore’s period and the contemporary period and decided to apply Moore’s utopian thoughts to the modern times. It concludes that if Moore’s utopianism is applied with modification, the present world will attain its dream of becoming a common community, which extols friendship and brotherhood.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Kingsley, O. (2014) Utopianism and the New World Order: A Critical Consideration. Open Journal of Philosophy, 4, 332-344. doi: 10.4236/ojpp.2014.43037.

References

[1] Bar, J. C. (2000). Utopianism and Realism in Judaism. Tuesday Torah Lecture Series, New Jersey: Communication Commission.
[2] Berje, M. (2000). Religious Utopia in the Age of Violence. New York: MaryKnoll.
[3] Brie, M. (2011). Making the Common Good of Humanity Concrete. Brussels: Rosa Luxemburg Foundation
[4] De Schuller, O. (2011). Eco-Farming Can Double Food Production. Geneva: High Commission for Human Right.
[5] Dierkersen, S. (2010). Modern Society and Modern Economy: A Review.
www.Humansociety.edu://justice.org://html
[6] Dixon, H. (nd). Analyzing Resolution Equality in “Plato’s Republic”. Texas: Free Communication.
[7] Egan, M. (1997). Ibsen: The Critical Heritage. London: Rutledge.
[8] Fotemeh, E. (2011). Utopia Thinking—From Plato to Ibsen and O’Neil. London: Critical Heritage.
[9] Godeller, M. (1982). Humanity and Values in the Modern World.
www.humanvalues/marketeconomy.edu/html
[10] Hourtart, F. (2009). Eccamimo: A la utopia desde un mundo de incertidumbre. Panam: Ruth Casa
[11] Hourtart, F. (2011). From “Common Goods” to the “Common Good of Humanity”. Brussels: Rosa Luxemburg Foundations.
[12] Joshua, N. (1999). Lucan, the City and the Utopian Symptom: An Analysis of Abject Urban Spaces. London: Oxford University Press
[13] Kaleb, G. (1963). Utopianism and Its Enemies. New York: Free Press
[14] Kovel, J. (2007). The Enemy of Nature—The End of Capitalism or the End of the World. London: Zed Books.
[15] Kumar, K, (1979). Utopia and Anti-Utopia in Modern Times. Oxford: Black Well
[16] Kumar, K. (1991). Utopianism. London: Taylor and Francis Group.
[17] Logan, G. M., & Adams, R. M. (2002). Utopia. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[18] Maryan, R. M. (2011). The Role of Women on Plato’s Republic and Thomas Moore’s Utopia.
www.utopianism./edu.org
[19] Meszaros, K. (2008). The Man and the Market. New York: Oribis Books.
[20] Moore, T. (1516). Utopia Book 1. www.Utopia.edu.org
[21] Okoro, K. N. (2011). Towards a New World and New Humanity: Radindranath Tagore’s Model in Conscious Connectivity. In M. Brenner (Ed.), Creating Dignity in Conversion (pp. 255-271). Charleston, VA: Lexigngton K.Y.
[22] Okoro, K. N., & Osunwoke, C. I. (2013). Common Humanity not Common Community: The Solution to Global Crisis. African Journal of Political Science and International Affairs, 7, 12-23.
[23] Pagden, M. K. (2012). Tha Language of Political Theory in Early Modern Europe.
www.modernhoalthough./edu.pagdon/org
[24] Pippin, R. (1997). Idealism as Modernism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[25] Players, G. (2010). After Globalization—Becoming Actors in Global Age. Cambridge: The Poultry Press.
[26] Ruth, L. (1999). Concept of Utopia: Utopianism and Communitarianism. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.
[27] Staver, C. (1988). Religious Utopia and Modern Development. NJ: Edumund Publishers.
[28] Stem, M. (2006). Report on the Economy of Climate Change. London: The Treasury Press.
[29] Stuver, A. L. (1998). The Destruction of Utopia. Frostbrog: Frostbrog State University.
[30] Sullivan, E. D. S. (1983). The Utopian Vision: Seven Essays on the Quintessential of Sir Thomas Moore. San Diego, CA: San Diego State University Press.
[31] Dersens, W. (2011) Re-Thinking Modern Economic System.
www.moderneconomy.edu://justice.org/html
[32] World Council of Churches (WCC) (2006). Alternative Globalization Addressing People and Earth. Geneva: Peace and Creative Forum.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.