Transfer of Visuomotor Adaptation to Unpractised Hands and Sensory Modalities

Otmar Bock, Gerd Schmitz

Institute of Physiology and Anatomy, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Institute of Sports Science, Leibniz University Hannover, Hannover, Germany.

DOI: 10.4236/psych.2013.412145                

Abstract

A recent model (Bock, 2013) predicts that sensorimotor adaptation, achieved while pointing at visual targets, will transfer fully to acoustic targets. The model further predicts that visual-to-acoustic transfer is not diminished even if the left and right arms have adapted to a different distortion. To scrutinize these predictions, we asked subjects to point at visual targets with their right hands under a +30 deg rotation of visual feedback (group “single”), or alternately, with their right hands under a +30 deg and with their left hands under a -30 deg rotation of visual feedback. Aftereffects were registered for each hand and for visual as well as acoustic targets, in counterbalanced order. We found that acoustic aftereffects were only about 66% of visual ones, which violates the first prediction and calls for an amendment of the model. We further found that acoustic aftereffects were of similar magnitude in both groups, which supports the second prediction. Finally, we observed an intermanual transfer of only about 29%. These findings suggest that unpractised acoustic inputs are weighted somewhat lower than practised visual ones, and that outputs to the unpractised left hand are weighted substantially lower than those to the practised right hand.

Keywords

Sensorimotor Adaptation; Motor Learning; Intermanual; Intersensory; Transfer

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Alahyane, N. (2004). Eye position specificity of saccadic adaptation. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 45, 123-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.03-0570
[2]	Bock, O. (1992). Adaptation of aimed arm movements to sensorimotor discordance: Evidence for direction-independent gain control. Behavioural Brain Research, 51, 41-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4328(05)80310-9
[3]	Bock, O., Worringham, C., & Thomas, M. (2005). Concurrent adaptations of left and right arms to opposite visual distortions. Experimental Brain Research, 162, 513-519. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-2222-0
[4]	Bock, O. (2013). Basic principles of sensorimotor adaptation to different distortions with different effectors and movement types: A review and synthesis of behavioral findings. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 81. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00081
[5]	Cohen, M. M. (1967). Continuous versus terminal visual feedback in prism aftereffects. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 24, 1295-1302. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.1967.24.3c.1295
[6]	Cohen, M. M. (1973). Visual feedback, distribution of practice, and intermanual transfer of prism aftereffects. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 37, 599-609. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.1973.37.2.599
[7]	Cotti, J., Guillaume, A., Alahyane, N., Pélisson, D., & Vercher, J.-L. (2007). Adaptation of voluntary saccades, but not of reactive saccades, transfers to hand pointing movements. Journal of Neurophysiology, 98, 602-612. http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00293.2007
[8]	Kagerer, F. A., & Contreras-Vidal, J. L. (2009). Adaptation of sound localization induced by rotated visual feedback in reaching movements. Experimental Brain Research, 193, 315-321. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1630-3
[9]	Malfait, N., Gribble, P. L., & Ostry, D. J. (2005). Generalization of motor learning based on multiple field exposures and local adaptation. Journal of Neurophysiology, 93, 3327-3338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00883.2004
[10]	McNay, E. C., & Willingham, D. B. (1998). Deficit in learning of a motor skill requiring strategy, but not of perceptualmotor recalibration, with aging. Learning & Memory, 4, 411-420. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/lm.4.5.411
[11]	Prablanc, C., Tzavaras, A., & Jeannerod, M. (1975). Adaptation of the two arms to opposite prism displacements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27, 667-671. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14640747508400527
[12]	Redding, G. (1996). Adaptive spatial alignment and strategic perceptual-motor control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 379-394. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.22.2.379
[13]	Taub, E., & Goldberg, I. A. (1973). Prism adaptation: Control of intermanual transfer by distribution of practice. Science, 180, 755-757. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.180.4087.755
[14]	Thomas, M., & Bock, O. (2010). Is sensorimotor adaptation to position- and velocity-dependent visual distortions based on distinct adaptive processes? Human Movement Science, 29, 179-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2010.02.002
[15]	Thomas, M., & Bock, O. (2012). Concurrent adaptation to four different visual rotations. Experimental Brain Research, 221, 85-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3150-4
[16]	Wada, Y., Kawabata, Y., Kotosaka, S., Yamamoto, K., Kitazawa, S., & Kawato, M. (2003). Acquisition and contextual switching of multiple internal models for different viscous force fields. Neuroscience Research, 46, 319-331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-0102(03)00094-4
[17]	Werner, S., & Bock, O. (2007). Effects of variable practice and declarative knowledge on sensorimotor adaptation to rotated visual feedback. Experimental Brain Research, 178, 554-559. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-007-0925-0
[18]	Woolley, D., Tresilian, J., Carson, R., & Rick, S. (2007). Dual adaptation to two opposing visuomotor rotations when each is associated with different regions of workspace. Experimental Brain Research, 179, 155-165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-006-0778-y
[19]	Zwiers, M. P., van Opstal, A. J., & Paige, G. D. (2003). Plasticity in human sound localization induced by compressed spatial vision. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 175-181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn999.