Initial Experience with BoneBac PressTM: A Novel Autologous Bone Graft Harvesting and Collecting Device


Object: The objective of this study is to analyze the utility of a novel autologous bone graft harvesting and collecting device in spinal fusion surgeries. Methods: 35 patients underwent fusion procedures in the cervical or lumbar spine using the BoneBac PressTM. Procedures included anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF), lumbar laminectomy and posterolateral arthrodesis, and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). The amount of bone graft collected from each level was determined as well as the need for additional bone graft extenders. Fusion rates were determined based on an independent radiographic evaluation performed 5 to 12 months postoperatively. Results: 54 total levels were operated upon, collecting a total of 176.0 cc of autograft. The average amount of bone collected was 3.26 cc/level. In the cervical and lumbar spine the average amount of bone collected per level was 2.30 cc and 6.77 cc respectively. The fusion rate was 94.3% at 10 months postoperatively. In most cases no additional bone graft extender was needed. Autologous bone collected had excellent handling characteristics and was easily packed into cages or placed posterolaterally. Conclusions: The use of autograft bone material collected using the BoneBac PressTM is costeffective, significantly reduces bone graft cost, and eliminates donor graft site morbidity while promoting successful fusion.

Share and Cite:

M. Perez-Cruet, E. Begun, R. Collins and D. Fahim, "Initial Experience with BoneBac PressTM: A Novel Autologous Bone Graft Harvesting and Collecting Device," Open Journal of Orthopedics, Vol. 3 No. 5, 2013, pp. 243-247. doi: 10.4236/ojo.2013.35045.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Z. Chen, J. Zhao, A. Liu, J. Yuan and Z. Li, “Surgical Treatment of Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation by Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion,” International Orthopaedics, Vol. 33, No. 1, 2009, pp. 197-201. doi:10.1007/s00264-008-0531-1
[2] Z. Ito, Y. Matsuyama, Y. Sakai, S. Imagama, N. Wakao, K. Ando, et al., “Bone Union Rate with Autologous Iliac Bone versus Local Bone Graft in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion,” Spine, Vol. 35, No. 21, 2010, pp. E1101-E1105. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181de4f2e
[3] M. C. Kim, H. T. Chung, D. J. Kim, S. H. Kim and S. H. Jeon, “The Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Single Level Fusion,” Asian Spine Journal, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2011, pp. 111-116. doi:10.4184/asj.2011.5.2.111
[4] Y. Xiao, F. Li and Q. Chen, “Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with One Cage and Excised Local Bone,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Vol. 130, No. 5, 2010, pp. 591-597. doi:10.1007/s00402-009-0917-6
[5] E. Guerado and C. H. Fuerstenberg, “What Bone Graft Substitutes Should We Use in Post-Traumatic Spinal Fusion?” Injury: International Journal of the Care of the Injured, Vol. 42, Suppl. 2, 2011, pp. S64-S71. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2011.06.200
[6] T. Ichiyanagi, K. Anabuki, Y. Nishijima and H. Ono, “Isolation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells from Bone Marrow Wastes of Spinal Fusion Procedure (TLIF) for Low Back Pain Patients and Preparation of Bone Dusts for Transplantable Autologous Bone Graft with a Serum Glue,” BioScience Trends, Vol. 4, No. 3, 2010, pp. 110-118.
[7] A. Ozdemir Ovalioglu, C. Kilincer, T. C. Ovalioglu and O. Simsek, “Avulsion Fracture of the Anterior Iliac Crest after Bone Graft Harvest: Case Report and Review of Techniques, Risk Factors and Treatment,” Turkish Neurosurgery, Vol. 21, No. 3, 2011, pp. 423-426.
[8] E. Ahlmann, M. Patzakis, N. Roidis, L. Shepherd and P. Holtom, “Comparison of Anterior and Posterior Iliac Crest Bone Grafts in Terms of Harvest-Site Morbidity and Functional Outcomes,” Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, Vol. 84, No. 5, 2002, pp. 716-720.
[9] R. Dimitriou, G. I. Mataliotakis, A. G. Angoules, N. K. Kanakaris and P. V. Giannoudis, “Complications Following Autologous Bone Graft Harvesting from the Iliac Crest and Using the RIA: A Systematic Review,” Injury: International Journal of the Care of the Injured, Vol. 42, Suppl. 2, 2011, pp. S3-S15. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2011.06.015
[10] R. F. Heary, R. P. Schlenk, T. A. Sacchieri, D. Barone and C. Brotea, “Persistent Iliac Crest Donor Site Pain: Independent Outcome Assessment,” Neurosurgery, Vol. 50, No. 3, 2002, pp. 510-517.
[11] C. E. Schwartz, J. F. Martha, P. Kowalski, D. A. Wang, R. Bode, L. Li, et al., “Prospective Evaluation of Chronic Pain Associated with Posterior Autologous Iliac Crest Bone Graft Harvest and Its Effect on Postoperative Outcome,” Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, Vol. 7, 2009, p. 49. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-7-49
[12] M. Perez-Cruet, “Minimally Invasive Spine Fusion: Techniques and Nuances,” Quality Medical Publishing, St. Louis, 2011, pp. 346-367.
[13] S. Berven, B. K. Tay, F. S. Kleinstueck and D. S. Bradford, “Clinical Applications of Bone Graft Substitutes in Spine Surgery: Consideration of Mineralized and Demineralized Preparations and Growth Factor Supplementation,” European Spine Journal, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2001, pp. S169-S177. doi:10.1007/s005860100270
[14] M. Perez-Cruet, “Minimally Invasive Spine Fusion: Techniques and Nuances,” Quality Medical Publishing, St. Louis, 2011, pp. 96-120.
[15] J. M. Toth, S. D. Boden, J. K. Burkus, J. M. Badura, S. M. Peckham and W. F. McKay, “Short-Term Osteoclastic Activity Induced by Locally High Concentrations of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 in a Cancellous Bone Environment,” Spine, Vol. 34, No. 6, 2009, pp. 539-550. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181952695
[16] K. R. Garrison, S. Donell, J. Ryder, I. Shemilt, M. Mugford, I. Harvey, et al., “Clinical Effectiveness and CostEffectiveness of Bone Morphogenetic Proteins in the Non-Healing of Fractures and Spinal Fusion: A Systematic Review,” Health Technology Assessment, Vol. 11, No. 30, 2007, pp. 1-150.
[17] D. J. Jo, J. K. Jun, K. T. Kim and S. M. Kim, “Lumbar Interbody Fusion Outcomes in Degenerative Lumbar Disease: Comparison of Results between Patients over and under 65 Years of Age,” Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society, Vol. 48, No. 5, 2010, pp. 412-418. doi:10.3340/jkns.2010.48.5.412
[18] C. Schizas, N. Tzinieris, E. Tsiridis and V. Kosmopolous, “Minimally Invasive versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Evaluating Initial Experience,” International Orthopaedics, Vol. 33, No. 6, 2009, pp. 1683-1688.

Copyright © 2022 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.