Open Journal of Modern Neurosurgery

Volume 6, Issue 1 (January 2016)

ISSN Print: 2163-0569   ISSN Online: 2163-0585

Google-based Impact Factor: 0.31  Citations  

The Fate of Abstracts Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Congress of Neurologic Surgeons

HTML  XML Download Download as PDF (Size: 330KB)  PP. 1-8  
DOI: 10.4236/ojmn.2016.61001    3,381 Downloads   4,200 Views  Citations

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to determine the publication rate and time to publication following abstract presentation at a major neurosurgical meeting, namely the 2005 annual meeting of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS). We reviewed all 754 abstracts presented at the 2005 CNS annual meeting to determine publication status and identify factors that are associated with publication. A standardized database search was conducted to determine publication status. Predictors of publication were examined. Of the 754 abstracts presented, 383 (50.8%) were published after 5.3 years. The median time to publication was 450 days (range-646 to 1953 days) with 16% being published prior to the meeting. Oral presentations had a publication rate of 64.0% compared to 48.3% for poster presentations. Of the abstracts not published prior to the meeting, 77% were published within 3 years of the meeting. In univariate analysis, neuro-oncology abstracts (OR 1.88; 95% CI 1.34 - 2.64; p < 0.001) and abstracts selected for oral presentation (OR 1.97; 95% CI 1.30 - 2.99; p = 0.001) had a significantly higher likelihood of publication. These associations remained independent in multivariate analysis. Neuro-oncology abstracts (p = 0.004), basic science research (p = 0.003) and abstracts selected for oral presentation (p = 0.036) were published in higher impact factor journals. Half of presentations at the annual CNS meeting will be published in peer-reviewed journals with a median time to publication of 450 days. Neuro-oncology abstracts and those abstracts selected for oral presentation have a significantly higher likelihood of publication.

Share and Cite:

Elliott, C. , Mehta, V. , Poon, C. , Oliver, M. and Gourishankar, S. (2016) The Fate of Abstracts Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Congress of Neurologic Surgeons. Open Journal of Modern Neurosurgery, 6, 1-8. doi: 10.4236/ojmn.2016.61001.

Cited by

[1] Publications after conference presentations: A systematic review of published studies.
2021
[2] Charting the course from abstract to published article
Journal of …, 2021
[3] Publications after conference presentations: A systematic review of published studies
Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, 2021
[4] 2000-2017 Yılları Arasında Ulusal Nöroloji Kongrelerinde Sunulan Sözel Sunumların Hastalıklara Göre Dağılım Paternleri ve Yayınlanma Oranları
Turk J Neurol, 2020
[5] Distribution Patterns and Publishing Rates of Oral Presentations Presented in National Neurology Congresses According to Diseases Between 2000-2017
2020
[6] Trends in the quality of work presented at the society of british neurological surgeons meetings: 1975 to 2010
British Journal of Neurosurgery, 2018
[7] Medical conferences: value for money?
2018
[8] Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts
2018

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.