Open Journal of Anesthesiology
Vol.5 No.2(2015), Paper ID 54112, 6
pages
DOI:10.4236/ojanes.2015.52006
Phenothiazine vs 5HT3 Antagonist Prophylactic Regimens to Prevent Post‐Anesthesia Care Unit Rescue Antiemetic: An Observational Study
Joseph R. Ruiz, Joe E. Ensor, Jeffrey W. Lim, Antoinette Van Meter, Thomas F. Rahlfs
Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
Copyright © 2015 Joseph R. Ruiz, Joe E. Ensor, Jeffrey W. Lim, Antoinette Van Meter, Thomas F. Rahlfs et al. This is
an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution
License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any
medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
How to Cite this Article
Ruiz, J. , Ensor, J. , Lim, J. , Meter, A. and Rahlfs, T. (2015) Phenothiazine vs 5HT3 Antagonist Prophylactic Regimens to Prevent Post‐Anesthesia Care Unit Rescue Antiemetic: An Observational Study.
Open Journal of Anesthesiology,
5, 27-32. doi:
10.4236/ojanes.2015.52006.