[1]
|
Balswick, J. O. (1987). The psychological captivity of Evangelicalism. In W. H. Swatos, Jr. (Ed.), Religious Sociology: Interfaces and Boundaries (pp. 141-152). West Port, CT: Greenwood Press.
|
[2]
|
Bartkowski, J. P. (1996). Beyond Biblical literalism and inerrancy: Conservative Protestants and the interpretation of Scripture. Sociol- ogy of Religion, 57, 259-272. doi:10.2307/3712156
|
[3]
|
Bartkowski, J. P. (2001). Remaking the Godly marriage: Gender nego- tiation in Evangelical families. Rutgers, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
|
[4]
|
Bartkowski, J. P. (2004). The Promise Keepers: Servants, soldiers, and Godly men. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
|
[5]
|
Berger, P. L. (1967). The sacred canopy: Elements of a sociological theory of religion. New York, NY: Anchor Books.
|
[6]
|
Bianchi, S. M., Milkie, M. A., Sayer, L. C., & Robinson, J. P. (2000). Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces, 79, 191-228. doi:10.2307/2675569
|
[7]
|
Christianity Today. (2004). “Christianity Today- Informing. Inspiring. Connecting. Equipping.” Accessed March 10, 2004
[http://www.christianitytoday.com/].
|
[8]
|
Clapp, R. (1993). Families at the crossroads: Beyond traditional and modern options. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.
|
[9]
|
Collins, K. J. (2005). The Evangelical moment: The promise of an American religion. Grand Rapids, MI: BakerAcademic.
|
[10]
|
Coltrane, S. (1997). Family man: Fatherhood, housework, and gender equity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
|
[11]
|
Coltrane, S. (2000). Research on household labor: Modeling and meas- uring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1208-1233.
doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01208.x
|
[12]
|
Cowan, C. P., & Cowan, P. A. (1992). When partners become parents: The big life change for couples. New York: Basic Books.
|
[13]
|
Denton, M. (2004). Gender and marital decision making: Negotiating religious ideology and practice. Social Forces, 82, 1151-1180.
doi:10.1353/sof.2004.0034
|
[14]
|
Ellison, C. G., & Bartkowski, J. P. (2002) Conservative Protestantism and the division of household labor among married couples. Journal of Family Issues, 23, 950-985. doi:10.1177/019251302237299
|
[15]
|
Frederick, T. V., & Balswick, J. O. (2006). Evangelical gender ideol- ogy: A view from Christianity Today readers. Journal of Religion and Society, 8, 1-12.
|
[16]
|
Gallagher, S. K. (2003). Evangelical identity and gendered family life. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
|
[17]
|
Gallagher, S. K., & Smith, C. (1999). Symbolic traditionalism and pragmatic egalitarianism: Contemporary evangelicals, families, and gender. Gender & Society, 13, 211-233.
doi:10.1177/089124399013002004
|
[18]
|
Hunter, J. D. (1983). American Evangelicalism: Conservative religion and the quandary of modernity. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Uni- versity Press.
|
[19]
|
Hunter, J. D. (1987). Evangelicalism: The coming generation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
|
[20]
|
Kim, J. O., & Mueller, C. W. (1978). Factor analysis: Statistical meth- ods and practical issues (Vol. 07014). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
|
[21]
|
Kroska, A. (2000). Conceptualizing and measuring gender ideology as an identity. Gender & Society, 14, 368-394.
doi:10.1177/089124300014003002
|
[22]
|
Kroska, A. (2002). Does gender ideology matter? Examining the rela- tionship between gender ideology and self- and partner- meanings. Social Psychology Quarterly, 65, 248-265. doi:10.2307/3090122
|
[23]
|
Lee, C. (1998). Beyond family values. Grand Rapids, MI: InterVarsity Press.
|
[24]
|
Piper, J. (1991). A vision of Biblical complementarity: Manhood and womanhood defined according to the Bible. In J. Piper & W. Grudem (Eds.). Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood: A Response to Evangelical Feminism (pp. 31-59). Wheaton, IL: Crossway.
|
[25]
|
Pleck, J. H. (1981). The myth of masculinity. Cambridge, MA: Massa- chusetts Institute of Technology Press.
|
[26]
|
Robinson, J. R. (1985). The validity and reliability of diaries versus alternative time use measures. In F. Thomas and F. P. Sanford (Eds.), Time, Goods, and Well-Being (pp. 33-62). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
|
[27]
|
Smith, C. (2000). Christian America? What Evangelicals really want. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
|
[28]
|
Smith, C., with Emerson, M., Gallagher, S. K., Kennedy, P., and Sik- kink, D. (1998). American Evangelicalism: Embattled and thriving. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
|
[29]
|
Smith, A. D., & Reid, W. J. (1986). Role-Sharing marriage. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
|
[30]
|
Stacey, J. (1990). Brave new families: Stories of domestic upheaval in late twentieth-century America. New York, NY: BasicBooks.
|
[31]
|
Sweeney, D. A. (2005). The American Evangelical story: A history of the movement. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic.
|
[32]
|
Van Leeuwen, M. S., Knoppers, A., Koch, M. L., Schuurman, D. J., & Sterk, H. M. (1993). After Eden: Facing the challenge of gender reconciliation. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
|
[33]
|
Webber, R. E. (1978). Common roots: A call to Evangelical maturity. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
|
[34]
|
Wilcox, W. B. (2004). Soft patriarchs, new men: How Christianity shapes fathers and husbands. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
|