1. Introduction
Research semiconductor is one of the important research activities being carried out around the world. Potential application areas are diverse due to the unique and interesting properties of semiconductor materials, such as optoelectronics, photonics, laser diodes, sensors, polymer-based flexible solar cells, color-sensitive solar battery electrodes, etc. [1] [2] [3] [4] . In particular, ZnO semiconductor is one of the potential candidates to be studied for the above application fields due to its wide gap width (3.37 eV) and large exciton energy (60 meV) at temperature room [5] - [12] . Recently, white light emitting diode material (LED) based on ZnO nanostructure as an alternative source for energy-saving light sources has been developed and studied by many research groups [13] - [17] . In addition, ZnO is the most abundant nanostructured material, such as nanowires, nanofibers, nanorods, pyramids, spheres, flowers, etc., so ZnO nanomaterials (ZnO NMs) are being studied the most to improve the properties of the applied materials [18] - [26] . Currently, the using of ZnO nanomaterials doped with transition metal ions on an industrial scale is continuously encouraging researchers to change and improve physical, chemical, and electrical properties, etc., so that it becomes a better material for many applications [27] - [35] . ZnO NMs have been synthesized by various methods, such as wet chemical method, solution combustion, sol-gel synthesis, chemical precipitation, solvothermal/hydrothermal reaction, etc. [10] [19] - [27] [29] [33] [35] . Some of these fabrication methods have limitations, for example, it is difficult to control the growth of the nanostructure of the fabricated materials due to the reaction rate or reaction temperature in the sol-gel reactions, chemical precipitation, solution combustion, etc. Among the above methods, the hydrothermal fabrication method is considered a promising advantage method because this method is simple, the simple equipment, the synthesis at low temperature, easy to control the grain size, large-scale uniform fabrication and environmental friendliness [19] [21] [23] [35] .
In this work, we studied the fabrication of Cu2+ doped ZnO nanorods materials using hexamethylenetetramine solvent (with the ratio of Zn2+:HMTA = 1:4) by hydrothermal method and investigated the photocatalytic properties for decomposition of methylene blue dye solution under ultraviolet irradiation.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
All chemicals were of analytical grade and used without any further purification, including: Copper(II) nitrate trihydrate (Cu(NO3)2∙3H2O, 99.8%, AR-China); Zinc nitrate hexahydrate (Zn(NO3)2∙6H2O, 98%, AR-China); Hexamethylenetetramine (HMTA, C6H12N4, 95%, AR-China). All solutions were prepared with double distilled water.
2.2. Sample Synthesis
A mixed solution of 0.1 M Zn(NO3)2 and 0.1 M HMTA was uniformly mixed in a volume ratio of 1:4 on a magnetic stirrer at constant speed for 15 minutes. To doped Cu2+ into the above-mixed solution, a solution of Cu(NO3)2 in the molar ratio of 0, 2%, 5% and 7% (calculated compared to the number of moles of Zn2+) was slowly added to the mixed solution. The mixed solution was continuously stirred for another 5 minutes and then transferred to a 100 mL Teflon to carry out the hydrothermal reaction at 90˚C for 6 hours. The precipitate obtained after hydrothermal process was filtered and washed several times with double distilled water until the pH ≈ 7. Next, the clean precipitate was dried at 80˚C for 24 hours. The final product was a fine white or blue powder depending on the doped Cu ion content. Synthetic powder product samples were denoted as pure ZnO, 2%Cu-ZnO, 5%Cu-ZnO and 7%Cu-ZnO samples with Cu2+ doped content of 0, 2, 5 and 7 mol.% (compared to the mole’s number of Zn2+), respectively. Figure 1 showed images of pure ZnO, 2%Cu-ZnO, 5%Cu-ZnO and 7%Cu-ZnO samples after hydrothermal process were filtered and washed and preparation for the next step was to dry at 80˚C for 24 hours to obtain the Cu2+ doped ZnO samples, respectively.
2.3. Characterization
X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were measured on a X’pert Pro (PANalytical) MPD using Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 1.54065 Å, scan speed: 0.03˚/2s, 2θ » 25˚ - 75˚). Raman shift spectra were measured on MicroRaman LABRAM-1B (laser wavelength: 633 nm, laser power: 6.25 mW, Leica NPLAN L50x/0.50 BD microscope). Scanning electron microscopy/X-ray energy scattering spectra (SEM/EDX) were measured on a HITACHI TM4000 Plus. Reflectance spectra were measured on a Jasco V-750, DRUV-Vis (using a 60 mm integrated sphere of ISV-922, scan speed: 200 nm/min). Liquid UV-Vis absorption spectra were measured on an Agilent 8453.
2.4. Photocatalysis
The photocatalytic activity of the prepared samples was evaluated by degradation the methylene blue (MB) solution. 50 mg of the nanopowder catalyst was suspended in a pyrex containing 60 mL of 10 ppm methylene blue aqueous solution. Then, the mixture was stirred for 60 min in dark to obtain the adsorption-desorption equilibrium. The reaction mixture was exposed to ultraviolet light by a SH-HB2-200W Highbay lamp with central wavelength emission at 370 nm. After every 10 minutes of irradation, 5 ml of the solution was taken out, filtered, centrifuged to get the solution that had separated the catalyst powder and measured the absorbance of those selected solution on a UV-vis spectrophotometer (VARRIAN Carry100) at the maximum wavelength of MB solution (λ = 660 nm). MB degradation was determined according to the formula below.
Figure 1. Images of pure ZnO, 2%Cu-ZnO, 5%Cu-ZnO and 7%Cu-ZnO samples after hydrothermal process were filtered and washed and preparation for the next step was to dry at 80˚C for 24 hours to obtain the Cu2+ doped ZnO samples, respectively.
(1)
where D(%) is the degradation of MB, %; C0 is the initial concentration of MB (mM) (t = 0); C is the concentration of MB (mM) at time t (minutes).
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Structural Properties
Define X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of pure ZnO, 2%Cu-ZnO, 5%Cu-ZnO and 7%Cu-ZnO samples are shown in Figure 2. On the XRD diagram, Figure 2 showed that the material samples all appear spectral peaks at 2θ diffraction angle positions of 31.7˚, 34.4˚, 36.3˚, 47.5˚, 56.6˚, 62.9˚, 67.9˚ and 69.1˚ correspond to the (100), (002), (101), (102), (110), (103), (112) and (201) lattice planes of the hexagonal wurtzite ZnO with space group (P63mc) (JCPDS card No. 89-7102) [18] [20] [28] .
Diffraction spectra showed that all samples were in single phase and there were no anomalous peaks related to Cu metal clusters or Cu oxides secondary phases. This showed that the Cu ions doped ZnO samples retain the hexagonal wurtzite structure of ZnO. Also, it was attributed to the good dispersion of Cu2+ into the ZnO lattice [17] [20] [28] [29] . This can be explained that Cu has been doped into the ZnO lattice and Cu2+ ions have replaced Zn2+ ions because the atomic radii of these two ions are nearly equal (
= 0.074 nm and
= 0.072 nm) [17] [29] . The crystalline size of samples was calculated using the Scherrer formula [20] [28] :
(2)
where d is the crystalline size (nm); λ is the wavelength of X-ray radiation (λ =
Figure 2. XRD patterns of pure ZnO, 2%Cu-ZnO, 5%Cu-ZnO and 7%Cu-ZnO samples.
1.54065 Å); θ is the Bragg angle (radians); β is full width half maxima (FWHM) of (101) diffraction peak (radians). The calculated crystallite size of pure ZnO, 2%Cu-ZnO, 5%Cu-ZnO and 7%Cu-ZnO samples were about 64.5 nm, 22.6 nm, 21.8 nm and 20.4 nm, respectively. This can be observed that the crystallite size of samples decreases from 64.5 nm to 20.4 nm when Cu2+ content increases from 0 mol.% to 7 mol.%, indicating that the Cu dopant inhibited the crystallization of ZnO samples.
The general chemical equation of the Cu2+ doped ZnO synthesis reaction could be described by the following mechanism [15] [19] [21] :
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
3.2. Raman Spectra Analysis
Figure 3 showed the Raman spectra of pure ZnO, 2%Cu-ZnO, 5%Cu-ZnO and 7%Cu-ZnO samples. The Raman spectra showed that the fabricated samples all had Raman wave vibration positions corresponding to the wave vibration positions of the hexagonal wurtzite structure ZnO with space group P63mc [13] [18] . The peaks that were observed at 335 cm−1 and 390 cm−1 were assigned to the E2(high) − E2(low) and A1(TO) modes of the hexagonal wurrtzite ZnO, respectively. The peak at 440 cm−1 was assigned to the E1(TO) mode of the hexagonal wurrtzite
Figure 3. Raman spectra of pure ZnO, 2%Cu-ZnO, 5%Cu-ZnO and 7%Cu-ZnO samples.
ZnO. The peak at 573 cm−1 was assigned to the E1(LO) mode of the hexagonal wurrtzite ZnO [13] [18] .
It could be seen that the wave vibration positions as wel as wave intensity of Raman spectra of the samples were almost similar, with no significant difference. It is possible that the doping amount of Cu2+ in the ZnO sample is small (≤7 mol.%). In addition, in the Raman spectra of pure ZnO and doped ZnO samples, there were no wave peaks corresponding to the vibration modes of CuO, Cu2O or Cu. This could be explained similarly to above because the amount of Cu2+ doped into the lattice cell of ZnO is small (≤7 mol.%).
3.3. Morphological Characteristic
SEM images with different magnifications of pure ZnO, 2%Cu-ZnO, 5%Cu-ZnO and 7%Cu-ZnO samples were shown in Figure 4. The SEM images showed that the pure ZnO sample exhibit a nanorod structure with the thickness size of about 250 - 300 nm. The 2%Cu-ZnO sample exhibited a nanorods structure with the smaler thickness size (of about 20 - 30 nm). The 5%Cu-ZnO and 7%Cu-ZnO samples exhibited a tube structure in the meniscus form at the ends of the tube like a porosity meniscus tube with the thickness size of about 100 - 200 nm. Thus, it could be seen that when the content of doped Cu2+ in the ZnO lattice increased: it had the effect of preventing the growth of crystal grains. The crystals of the material samples grew in the form of rods with decreasing crystal size and increasing porosity.
3.4. Optical Properties
Figure 5 showed the plot between absorbance and wavelength for the pure ZnO,
Figure 4. SEM images of the pure ZnO, 2%Cu-ZnO, 5%Cu-ZnO and 7%Cu-ZnO samples.
Figure 5. The plot between (F(R)hν)2 and hν based on K-M model of pure ZnO, 2%Cu-ZnO, 5%Cu-ZnO and 7%Cu-ZnO samples. Inset: Photographs of pure ZnO, 2%Cu-ZnO, 5%Cu-ZnO and 7%Cu-ZnO samples of the experiment.
2%Cu-ZnO, 5%Cu-ZnO and 7%Cu-ZnO samples. The inset showed the photographs of the prepared pure ZnO, 2%Cu-ZnO, 5%Cu-ZnO and 7%Cu-ZnO samples of the experiment. The Kubelka-Munk (K-M) model was used to determine the band gap of the prepared samples based on equation below:
(9)
where F(R) was K-M function and R was reflectance [18] [20] . The band gap was found to be 3.31 eV, 3.17 eV, 3.16 eV and 3.15 eV for the pure ZnO, 2%Cu-ZnO, 5%Cu-ZnO and 7%Cu-ZnO samples, respectively. Here, it could be seen the band gap decreased gradually as the doping copper content increased gradually into the lattice of ZnO. This difference in the band gap was due to the difference in crystal shape and size of the nondoped and doped ZnO samples [18] [20] .
3.5. Photocatalytic Activity for Degradation of Methylene Blue Dye
Figure 6 was the plot to study the photocatalytic activity of ZnO samples for the degradation of methylene blue (MB) under UV irradiation.
The plots in Figure 6 showed that the 2%Cu-ZnO sample was the most for degradation of the MB dye solution, and achieved the decomposition efficiency of about 97%; the 5%Cu-ZnO sample achieved the decomposition efficiency of about 96%; the 7%Cu-ZnO sample had a decomposition efficiency of about 92.6% and the ZnO pure sample had the lowest decomposition efficiency of about 20%. It could be seen that the different content of Cu dopant into the pure ZnO lattice changed the shape and size of the crystal particles of the prepared
Figure 6. (a) The plot of absorbance versus reaction time. Inset: Photographs of 2%Cu-ZnO nanorods samples of the experiment. (b) The plot of the decrease in MB dye concentration against the reaction time of the pure ZnO and Cu2+ doped ZnO samples.
samples and led to an improvement in the photocatalytic performance for degradation of MB dye solution. The highest MB degradation efficiency was obtained in the ZnO sample with a copper doping concentration of 2 mol.%.
4. Conclusion
This study had been successfully synthesized by hydrothermal method for pure ZnO and Cu-doped ZnO nanorods samples with the change of dopant content at 2, 5 and 7 mol.%. The properties of the material samples were investigated, such as XRD method, Raman shift spectra, SEM, and Kubelka-Munk model analysis (K-M) based on the DRS reflectance spectrum. XRD and Raman spectra showed the material samples all have the wurtzite hexagonal structure of ZnO with space group (P63mc). The average crystal size of the Cu-doped samples was more reduced (reached 22.6 - 20.4 nm) than that of pure ZnO (64.5 nm). The pure ZnO and Cu-doped ZnO samples both had a shape in rods with the rods size decreasing and the rods porosity increasing when Cu doped into the ZnO lattice (reached of about 250 - 300 nm for pure ZnO sample; 20 - 30 nm for 2%Cu-ZnO sample; 100 - 200 nm for 5%Cu-ZnO and 7%Cu-ZnO samples). The band gap of the prepared samples based on the K-M model was determined to be 3.31 eV, 3.17 eV, 3.16 eV and 3.15 eV for the pure ZnO, 2%Cu-ZnO, 5%Cu-ZnO and 7%Cu-ZnO samples, respectively. Evaluation of photocatalytic activity showed that the degradation efficiency for MB dye solution was highest at 2%Cu-ZnO sample, reached about 97%, and the lowest decomposition efficiency was the pure ZnO sample, reached about 20%.
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by Hanoi University of Science and Technology (HUST) under the project number T2018-PC-233. This work was funded by Hanoi University of Science and Technology (HUST) under the project number AGF.2022-04. And the authors also thank for the support by the Hanoi University of Science and Technology (HUST) under the project number CT2022.04.BKA.05, Science and Technology Project of the Ministry of Education and Training of Vietnam.