Applied Mathematics
Vol.4 No.2(2013), Article ID:28422,4 pages DOI:10.4236/am.2013.42062
Common Fixed Point Theorems of Multi-Valued Maps in Ultra Metric Space
College of Science, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin, China
Email: *songmeimei@tjut.edu.cn
Received November 30, 2012; revised January 9, 2013; accepted January 16, 2013
Keywords: Multi-Valued Maps; Coincidence Point; Common Fixed Point
ABSTRACT
We establish some results on coincidence and common fixed point for a two pair of multi-valued and single-valued maps in ultra metric spaces.
1. Introduction
Roovij in [1] introduced the concept of ultra metric space. Later, C. Petalas, F. Vidalis [2] and Ljiljana Gajic [3] studied fixed point theorems of contractive type maps on a spherically complete ultra metric spaces which are generalizations of the Banach fixed point theorems. In [4] K. P. R. Rao, G. N. V. Kishore and T. Ranga Rao obtained two coincidence point theorems for three or four self maps in ultra metric space.
J. Kubiaczyk and A. N. Mostafa [5] extend the fixed point theorems from the single-valued maps to the setvalued contractive maps. Then Gajic [6] gave some generalizations of the result of [3]. Again, Rao [7] proved some common fixed point theorems for a pair of maps of Jungck type on a spherically complete ultra metric space.
In this article, we are going to establish some results on coincidence and common fixed point for two pair of multi-valued and single-valued maps in ultra metric spaces.
2. Basic Concept
First we introducing a notation.
Let denote the class of all non empty compact subsets of
. For
, the Hausdorff metric is defined as
where.
The following definitions will be used later.
Definition 2.1 ([1]) Letbe a metric space. If the metric
satisfies strong triangle inequality
Then is called an ultra metric on
and
is called an ultra metric space.
Example. Let,
, then
is a ultra metric space.
Definition 2.2 ([1]) An ultra metric space is said to be spherically complete if every shrinking collection of balls in has a non empty intersection.
Definition 2.3 An elementis said to be a coincidence point of
and
if
. We denote
the set of coincidence points of and
.
Definition 2.4 ([7]) Let be an ultra metric space,
and
.
and
are said to be coincidentally commuting at
if
implies
.
Definition 2.5 ([8]) An element is a common fixed point of
and
if
.
3. Main Results
The following results are the main result of this paper.
Theorem 3.1 Let be an ultra metric space. Let
be a pair of multi-valued maps and
a pair of single-valued maps satisfying
(a) is spherically complete;
(b)
for all, with
;
(c)
;
(d).
Then there exist point and
in
, such that
.
Proof. Let
denote the closed sphere with centeredand radius
.
Let be the collection of all the spheres for all
.
Then the relation
if
is a partial order on.
Consider a totally ordered sub family of
.
Since is spherically complete, we have
Let where
and
.
Then. Hence
(1)
If then
. Assume that
.
Let, then
Sinceis nonempty compact set, then
such that
;
is a nonempty compact set, then
such that
.
from (a) (b) and Equation (1)
Now
So, we have just proved that
for every
. Thus
is an upper bound in
for the family
and hence by Zorn’s Lemma, there is a maximal element in
, say
. There exists
such that
.
Suppose
.
Since are nonempty compact sets, then
such that
(2)
(3)
From (b), (c) and Equation (2), we have
(4)
(5)
From (b), (c) and Equations (2)-(5)
(6)
(7)
From Equation (4) and Equation (6) we have
(8)
From Equation (5) and Equation (7) we have
(9)
If
Then from Equation (8),. Hence
. It is a contradiction to the maximality of
in
, since
If
Then from Equation (9),. Hence
.It is a contradiction to the maximality of
in
, since
.
So
(10)
In addition,.
Using (b), (c) and Equation (10), we obtain
Hence.
Then the proof is completed.
Theorem 3.2 Let be an ultra metric space. Let
be a pair of multi-valued maps and
be a single-valued maps satisfying
(a) is spherically complete;
(b)
for all,with
;
(c);
(d).
Then and
have a coincidence point in
.
Moreover, if and
,
and
are coincidentally commuting at
and
, then
and
have a common fixed point in
.
Proof. If in Theorem 2.1, we obtain that there exist points
and
in
such that
.
As,
and
ipipare coincidentally commuting at
and
.
Write, then
.
Then we have
and
.
Now, since also,
and
are coincidentally commuting at
and
, so we obtain
.
Thus, we have proved that, that is,
is a common fixed point of
and
.
Corollary 3.3 Let be a spherically complete ultra metric space. Let
be a pair of multi-valued maps satisfying
(a) for all
,with
;
(b).
Then, there exists a pointin
such that
and
.
Remark 1 If in Corollary 3.3, then we obtain the Theorem of Ljiljana Gajic [6].
Remark 2 If in Theorem 3.1, , we obtain Theorem 9 of K. P. R. Rao at [7].
Remark 3 Ifand
in Theorem 3.1 are single-valued maps, then: 1) we obtain the results of K. P. R. Rao [4]; 2)
, we obtain the result of Ljiljana Gajic [3]; 3)
, then, we obtain Theorem 4 of K. P. R. Rao at [7].
4. Conclusion
In this paper, we get coincidence point theorems and common fixed point theorems for two pair of multi-valued and single-valued maps satisfying different contractive conditions on spherically complete ultra metric space, which is generalized results of [3-7].
5. Acknowledgements
Foundation item: Science and Technology Foundation of Educational Committee of Tianjin (11026177).
REFERENCES
- A. C. M. van Roovij, “Non Archimedean Functional Analysis,” Marcel Dekker, New York, 1978.
- C. Petalas and F. Vidalis, “A Fixed Point Theorem in Non-Archimedaen Vector Spaces,” Proceedings of the American Mathematics Society, Vol. 118, 1993, pp. 819- 821. doi:10.1090/S0002-9939-1993-1132421-2
- L. Gajic, “On Ultra Metric Spaces,” Novi Sad Journal of Mathematics, Vol. 31, No. 2, 2001, pp. 69-71.
- K. P. R. Rao, G. N. V. Kishore and T. Ranga Rao, “Some Coincidence Point Theorems in Ultra Metric Spaces,” International Journal of Mathematical Analysis, Vol. 1, No. 18, 2007, pp. 897-902.
- J. Kubiaczyk and A. N. Mostafa, “A Multi-Valued Fixed Point Theorem in Non-Archimedean Vector Spaces,” Novi Sad Journal of Mathematics, Vol. 26, No. 2, 1996, pp. 111- 116.
- L. Gajic, “A Multivalued Fixed Point Theorem in Ultra Metric Spaces,” Matematicki Vesnik, Vol. 54, No. 3-4, 2002, pp. 89-91.
- K. P. R. Rao and G. N. V. Kishore, “Common Fixed Point Theorems in Ultra Metric Spaces,” Journal of Mathematics, Vol. 40, 2008, pp. 31-35.
- B. Damjanovic, B. Samet and C. Vetro, “Common Fixed Point Theorem for Multi-Valued Maps,” Acta Mathematica Scientia, Vol. 32, No. 2, 2012, pp. 818-824. doi:10.1016/S0252-9602(12)60063-0
NOTES
*Corresponding author.