Biochar Application for Reducing Soil Salinity and Promoting Plant Growth under Climate Change

Abstract

Soils affected by salinity, which substantially limit agricultural productivity, are becoming an increasingly serious concern due to climate change and unsustainable land management practices. Biochar, a stable, carbon-rich material derived from biomass, has shown significant potential for mitigating the negative impacts of soil salinization. This paper examines the role of biochar in enhancing soil properties, promoting plant growth, and alleviating salinity stress. Evidence indicates that biochar improves key soil physical characteristics, including aggregate stability, porosity, and water-holding capacity, while also enhancing nutrient availability and cation exchange capacity. Moreover, biochar positively influences soil microbial communities, thereby strengthening soil health and increasing plant resilience to salt stress. Studies demonstrate that biochar can boost crop yields by an average of 29.3% through improving plant tolerance to saline conditions. This enhancement is linked to biochar’s ability to improve soil structure, facilitate nutrient cycling, and reduce toxic ion concentrations. Additionally, biochar contributes to climate change mitigation by sequestering carbon in soils and lowering greenhouse gas emissions. Nonetheless, potential drawbacks, such as the presence of toxic compounds or free radicals, must be carefully considered. This review highlights the importance of optimizing biochar production processes, including the choice of feedstocks (such as agricultural residues, organic waste, or halophytes) and particle size. It also identifies research gaps and suggests future directions, including the development of “carbon-neutral” or “carbon-negative” biochar systems through advanced pyrolysis or gasification techniques that minimize greenhouse gas emissions, promote sustainable agriculture, and support food security in salt-affected regions.

Share and Cite:

Bratovcic, A. (2025) Biochar Application for Reducing Soil Salinity and Promoting Plant Growth under Climate Change. Journal of Agricultural Chemistry and Environment, 14, 429-450. doi: 10.4236/jacen.2025.144029.

1. Introduction

Soil salinization is a form of land degradation characterized by the excessive build-up of soluble salts in the soil. In cases of naturally occurring (primary) salinization, salt buildup typically originates from sources such as rainfall containing oceanic salts (wet deposition), wind-driven transport of salt particles (dry deposition), and the physical or chemical weathering of parent rock materials. Salts can also be mobilized from saline geological formations through surface runoff or shallow groundwater movement. In contrast, secondary or anthropogenic salinization is primarily driven by human activities. These include the use of saline or brackish water for irrigation, inadequate water and land management practices leading to elevated water tables, seawater intrusion into coastal aquifers often a result of rising sea levels or over-extraction of freshwater and the excessive application of fertilizers [1]. Projections estimate that the global population will rise from approximately 7 billion to between 9 and 10 billion by 2050, necessitating an estimated 60% to 110% increase in food production to ensure food security [2]. Anthropogenic activities such as deforestation and the intensive consumption of fossil fuels have led to a significant rise in atmospheric CO2 concentrations, increasing from pre-industrial levels of approximately 280 ppm to over 400 ppm. Projections indicate that these levels may reach up to 800 ppm by the end of the 21st century [3]. According to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), over 1.4 billion hectares of land, approximately 10% of the global total are affected by salinity, with another billion hectares at risk due to climate change and unsustainable land practices. This was highlighted in FAO’s first major global report on salt-affected soils in 50 years, presented at the 2024 International Soil and Water Forum in Bangkok. FAO warns that rising soil salinity severely reduces fertility and threatens food security, with crop yield losses of up to 70% reported in some regions. The report estimates that 10% of irrigated and rainfed cropland is already impacted, and models suggest that, if current climate trends continue, salt-affected areas could expand to cover 24% - 32% of the Earth’s surface, particularly in developing countries. Ten countries, including China, the United States, and Iran, account for 70% of the world’s salt-affected soils [4]. The GSASmap illustrates the global distribution of salt-affected soils (SAS) with electrical conductivity of the extract (ECe) greater than 2 dS/m, exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) higher than 15 percent, and pH levels above 8.2. This assessment is provided for two soil depth ranges, from 0 to 30 centimeters and from 30 to 100 centimeters. Based on current data collected from 118 countries, which together represent about 85% of the Earth’s land surface, it is estimated that more than 424 million hectares of topsoil within the 0 to 30 centimeter layer and approximately 833 million hectares of subsoil in the 30 to 100 centimeter layer are affected by salinity. In the topsoil layer, 85% of salt-affected areas are saline, 10% are sodic, and 5% are saline-sodic. In the subsoil, 62% of affected areas are saline, 24% are sodic, and 14% are saline-sodic (FAO, 2021) [5].

Salt-affected soils are generally classified into three main types: saline soils, saline-sodic soils, and sodic soils. Saline soils are identified by an electrical conductivity of the saturated soil extract (ECe) greater than 4 dS/m at 25˚C, a pH typically below 8.5, and an exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) less than 15. Saline-sodic soils also have an ECe exceeding 4 dS/m at 25˚C, but their ESP is above 15. The pH of these soils can be either below or above 8.5. The high sodium content in these soils often leads to the breakdown of soil structure, which negatively affects plant development. In contrast, sodic soils are characterized by an ESP greater than 15 and an ECe below 4 dS/m at 25˚C. The pH in these soils usually falls between 8.5 and 10. Due to the high sodium levels and low salinity, soil particles tend to disperse, which reduces soil permeability and hampers water movement through the profile [6].

Elevated soil salinity can result from human activities, particularly due to improper fertilization and inefficient water management. Naturally saline soil is also common, especially in arid and semi-arid areas with low rainfall [7].

Soils with poor physicochemical and biological properties hinder plant growth, often due to natural processes, agricultural practices, or pollution. Biochar, a multifunctional carbon material, has been shown to improve soil quality and crop productivity, particularly in saline-sodic soils. This review highlights the positive effects of biochar on soil properties, microbial activity, and rice growth under salinity conditions, emphasizing its potential to enhance soil remediation and rice production [8]. Salinity is a major stressor that negatively impacts global crop production, but biochar, as an activated carbon soil conditioner, has the potential to alleviate its effects. Soil salinity is a growing concern, especially in arid and semi-arid regions, and this study aimed to assess the potential of biochar in alleviating salt stress in tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum) [9].

Abiotic stressors like drought and salinity severely impact crop yields, posing a significant threat to global food security, which is exacerbated by climate change. Utilizing agricultural waste to produce biochar offers an eco-friendly and sustainable solution to mitigate these stresses, ultimately supporting food production. This study explores the processes involved in biochar production from agro-waste, its role in improving soil properties, and its ability to enhance plant resilience against drought and salinity by boosting water retention, nutrient balance, and antioxidant activities, thereby ensuring sustainable crop yields under harsh conditions [10].

2. Abiotic Stress in Plants

Abiotic stress represents a major constraint on global crop productivity and contributes to the reduction of arable land. This issue is becoming increasingly critical in the context of rapid population growth and ongoing climate change. Abiotic stresses like drought and salinity pose significant threats to food security. Godoy et al. (2021) [11] conducted a comprehensive review of existing literature on the use of various natural plant metabolites, both primary (such as proline, L-tryptophan, glutathione, and citric acid) and secondary (including polyols, ascorbic acid, lipoic acid, glycine betaine, α-tocopherol, and melatonin) to enhance plant tolerance to abiotic stress. Their analysis focused on key environmental stressors such as drought, salinity, heavy metals, and temperature fluctuations, which are anticipated to intensify in frequency and severity due to ongoing climate change. The effectiveness of these compounds is typically assessed through their influence on metabolic, biochemical, and morphological traits across multiple crop species, with many studies reporting improved yields under both greenhouse and field conditions. Given the demonstrated potential of this approach to strengthen plant resilience, the feasibility of its broader application in the near future is also explored. Plants frequently encounter various forms of abiotic stress (Figure 1), including ultraviolet radiation, elevated temperatures, drought, salinity, and heavy metal exposure. These stressors disrupt the balance between pro-oxidant and antioxidant molecules, leading to a condition known as oxidative stress [12].

Figure 1. Impact of abiotic stress on crop productivity. Environmental stressors including extreme temperatures, drought, salinity, and heavy metal exposure (e.g., cadmium, copper, chromium) trigger physiological and biochemical responses in plants, such as elevated reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and decreased photosynthetic efficiency leading to inhibited growth and reduced agricultural yields.

Abiotic stress enhances the activity of the photorespiratory pathway, resulting in increased production of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). Additionally, reduced carbon dioxide uptake and assimilation disturb the electron flow within the photosynthetic electron transport chain, which in turn promotes the generation of reactive oxygen species such as superoxide radicals and singlet oxygen (1O2). Alongside hydroxyl radicals (·OH), the accumulation of H2O2, superoxide, and 1O2 causes oxidative damage to proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids, ultimately contributing to cellular injury and death [13].

To mitigate oxidative stress, plants rely on both enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant defenses. The enzymatic system comprises several key enzymes responsible for scavenging reactive oxygen species (ROS), including superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDHAR), dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR), glutathione reductase (GR), glutathione transferase (GST), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), glutathione peroxidase (GPX), and guaiacol peroxidases (POXs). The activity of these enzymes is typically upregulated under stress conditions. Complementing this, the non-enzymatic defense involves the synthesis of antioxidants such as proline, glutathione (GSH), ascorbic acid, carotenoids, flavonoids, and tocopherols, which help neutralize ROS and reduce oxidative damage [14].

2.1. Salinity as an Abiotic Stress and Its Induction of Oxidative and Physiological Responses

Salinity stress is one of the most pervasive forms of abiotic stress affecting plants, imposing both osmotic and ionic challenges that ultimately trigger oxidative damage and physiological dysfunction. Elevated salt concentrations in the rhizosphere reduce soil water potential, making water uptake more difficult and causing osmotic stress. This results in reduced cell turgor, stomatal closure, and diminished CO2 assimilation, which limits photosynthetic activity. The consequent over‐reduction of the photosynthetic electron transport chain promotes the leakage of electrons to oxygen, leading to excessive generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as superoxide, hydrogen peroxide, hydroxyl radicals, and singlet oxygen [15] [16]. In parallel, ionic stress arises from the excessive accumulation of Na+ and Cl in plant tissues, which disrupts nutrient balance, particularly the uptake and homeostasis of K+ and interferes with enzymatic activities, protein stability, and membrane integrity [17] [18]. These ionic perturbations exacerbate oxidative stress by impairing chloroplast and mitochondrial metabolism, further enhancing ROS production [19]. ROS are not only damaging agents but also function as signaling molecules regulating stress responses. However, under salinity, ROS often accumulate beyond the scavenging capacity of the antioxidant machinery, leading to oxidative damage manifested as lipid peroxidation, protein oxidation, DNA damage, and disruption of cellular organelles [20]. Physiologically, these processes are reflected in reduced growth, membrane instability, inhibition of photosynthesis, and overall yield loss [21]. To counteract salinity‐induced oxidative stress, plants activate both enzymatic (e.g., superoxide dismutase, catalase, ascorbate peroxidase, glutathione reductase) and non‐enzymatic (ascorbate, glutathione, flavonoids, carotenoids) antioxidant systems. They also accumulate osmoprotectants such as proline and glycine betaine to stabilize proteins and membranes, maintain osmotic balance, and protect the photosynthetic apparatus [16] [21]. Additionally, plants employ ion compartmentalization and selective ion transport to sustain a favorable K+/Na+ ratio, alongside stress‐responsive hormonal signaling pathways (e.g., ABA) to regulate stomatal conductance and gene expression [18]. Together, these responses illustrate the direct link between salinity as an abiotic stress and the cascade of oxidative and physiological disturbances it induces, highlighting the complexity of plant adaptive mechanisms under salt stress.

2.2. Effects of Drought and Salinity Stress on Plant Growth and Development

Drought stress (DS) and salinity stress (SS) are significant abiotic stresses that severely impact crop productivity worldwide and their effects have been exacerbated by rapid climate change, threatening global food security. Drought stress is induced by inadequate water availability, leading to a series of molecular, biochemical, and physiological modifications that enable plants to adapt to water deficit conditions. The variability and unpredictability of drought events are influenced by multiple factors, including the water retention capacity of the rhizosphere, rates of evapotranspiration, and irregular, uneven precipitation patterns. Water constitutes a substantial proportion of plant canopy biomass and is integral to various physiological processes essential for plant metabolism, growth, and development. Consequently, periods of water scarcity, particularly during dry seasons, represent critical stress phases that can severely impede plant growth, especially in drought-prone regions. The impact of drought stress on crop development is contingent upon the severity of the stress, the species involved, and the specific growth stage at which the stress occurs. Drought stress adversely affects virtually all aspects of plant metabolism, manifesting in alterations to morphological, physiological, biochemical, and molecular parameters. The subsequent sections provide a comprehensive examination of the effects of drought stress on plant systems [22]. Soil health, a key component of the “One Health” initiative and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), faces serious challenges from salinization and sodification caused by both environmental processes and human activities [23]. Soil health is essential for crop productivity, but degradation from salinity, particularly in saline-sodic soils, limits plant growth through osmotic stress, ion toxicity (e.g., Na+, Cl⁻), and nutrient imbalances. Soil acidity and salinity are major challenges for agriculture, impacting soil health and crop productivity. Salinity stress is a significant issue in arid and semi-arid regions, such as the southern high plains of the U.S., where salt accumulation in the root zone negatively impacts plant growth and yield.

3. Biochar

Biochar offers numerous agricultural and environmental benefits, such as enhancing soil health, improving crop growth and yield, and mitigating greenhouse gas emissions. It transforms soil properties, promotes seed germination, boosts plant resistance to stresses, and improves nutrient cycling, though its effectiveness depends on factors like feedstock, pyrolysis temperature, and application method [24].

Biochar is characterized by its high carbon content, abundance of functional groups, strong alkalinity, notable porosity, and substantial specific surface area (SSA). Due to these properties, it has been extensively applied as an organic amendment in acidic and neutral soils to enhance soil fertility. Nonetheless, the specific effects of biochar on saline soil properties and the underlying mechanisms remain insufficiently understood. Consequently, this study aims to evaluate how biochar influences the physical, chemical, and biological attributes of saline soils. The findings indicate that biochar can: 1) Reduce soil bulk density, increase porosity, support soil aggregate formation, and facilitate salt leaching; 2) Enhance soil cation exchange capacity (CEC) and reduce salinity through ion exchange and adsorption mechanisms; 3) Serve as a direct nutrient source, aid in nutrient and water retention, and improve nutrient dynamics, including soil organic carbon (SOC) turnover and nutrient cycling; 4) Promote the diversity and functionality of soil microbial communities, thereby indirectly influencing carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus cycling processes. However, these effects are significantly influenced by the biochar’s characteristics, its application rate, as well as the specific soil type and environmental context [25].

In a recent comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis, Wang et al. (2024) [26] synthesized findings from 660 paired observations across 99 peer-reviewed studies to assess the impact of biochar application on salt-affected soils. Their analysis focused on identifying the key determinants of biochar effectiveness, including initial soil characteristics, biochar properties, and various experimental conditions. The meta-analysis revealed that biochar significantly improved saline soil conditions, notably reducing the electrical conductivity of the saturated paste extract (ECe) by an average of 13.2%. This reduction was particularly pronounced in soils experiencing severe salinization, while lesser effects were observed in soils with mild to moderate salinity. Additionally, biochar application led to a notable 17.0% increase in soil cation exchange capacity (CEC), indicating improved nutrient retention capacity. Conversely, no statistically significant changes were detected in soil pH following biochar amendment. Biochar (BC), produced through pyrolysis of various biomass materials, is a powerful soil amendment whose effectiveness depends on the pyrolysis temperature and feedstock type. Biochar produced at temperatures above 500˚C increases soil bulk density and porosity, while biochar produced at lower temperatures (<500˚C) enhances bacterial diversity [27]. When applied to soil, biochar improves its physical and chemical properties, such as porosity, moisture retention, and nutrient availability, while reducing the negative impacts of salt, drought, and contamination, ultimately supporting agricultural sustainability, especially in semi-arid and arid regions [28]. Biochar, produced through the pyrolysis of organic materials, enhances soil fertility by improving its cation exchange capacity (CEC) and water-holding capacity, thereby boosting nutrient availability [29] [30]. The properties of biochar vary depending on the feedstock used and the pyrolysis temperature. When added to saline soils, biochar improves key physicochemical parameters, such as organic carbon, CEC, and available phosphorus, while also enhancing enzymatic activity, which ultimately supports increased crop productivity [31]. Biochar produced by pyrolysis biomass at 300˚C - 1000˚C has shown promise in reclaiming salt-affected soils by reducing electrical conductivity (ECe), exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP), and sodium adsorption ratio (SAR), while improving soil structure, water infiltration, pH, and nutrient availability [32] [33].

3.1. Chemical Composition and Physical-Chemical Properties of Biochar

A study investigated the effects of biochar as a soil amendment on quinoa growth, physiology, and yield under both independent and combined drought and salinity stress. Results showed that biochar significantly mitigated the negative impacts of these stresses, improving plant height, shoot biomass, and grain yield, especially when combined with alternate root-zone drying irrigation (ARD) under salinity, suggesting biochar as a promising approach for improving crop productivity in stressed environments. The study utilized biochar derived from corn straw pyrolyzed at 500˚C under anaerobic conditions. The resulting biochar was alkaline, with a particle size of 1.5 - 2 mm. Its composition included 70.38% carbon, 1.53% nitrogen, 1.68% hydrogen, 0.78% sulfur, and 31.8% ash, with a cation exchange capacity of 12.0 cmol(+)/kg, electrical conductivity of 1.05 mS/cm, and a pH of 9.14 [34]. Tang et al. (2023) [35] reported similar characteristics in their biochar samples ranging in size from 1.0 to 2.0 mm. The biochar had a pH of 9.0 and an electrical conductivity (EC) of 0.83 mS/cm. Their findings showed that the physicochemical properties of biochar varied depending on particle size. While pH remained relatively constant between 9.0 and 9.5 across different particle sizes, EC showed significant variation: smaller particles exhibited higher EC than the soil, whereas larger particles had lower EC values compared to the soil. The soil used in the study was premium topsoil sourced from LessMess Soil (Concord, ON, Canada), a common urban soil composed of mineral materials derived from calcareous subsoil. Its properties included a total carbon content of 26.4% and total nitrogen of 1.06%, both measured using Dumas combustion. Extractable phosphorus was 130 mg/L (determined using sodium bicarbonate extraction), magnesium was 480 mg/L, and potassium was 2500 mg/L (both extracted using ammonium acetate). The biochar was produced by Burt’s Greenhouses (Odessa, ON, Canada) from waste mixed-wood shipping pallets using a BlueFlame boiler in pyrolysis mode at 700˚C for 30 minutes. The total carbon content of the resulting biochar was 64.5%, as determined by Dumas combustion analysis performed by Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Ancaster, ON, Canada). These findings highlight the importance of optimizing biochar particle size for improving plant responses, particularly in saline soils. Biochar application on coastal saline soil for climate change mitigation, focusing on soil organic carbon (SOC), and greenhouse gases (GHGs), and crop yields has been investigated by Lin et al. 2015 [36]. Biochar was applied at 16 t∙ha−1, which resulted in a 27.7% increase in wheat grain mass per plant and enhanced SOC, while not influencing non-biochar SOC. The results indicated that biochar sequestered 92.3% of its carbon into the soil within one year, with no significant effect on GHG emissions, and demonstrated a greater global warming mitigation potential compared to corn stalk application [36].

3.2. Biochar Mechanisms and Effectiveness across Different Types of Salt-Affected Soils

Mechanisms and effectiveness differ significantly depending on soil type. In saline soils, biochar improves plant growth primarily by adsorbing excess salts, enhancing soil porosity, and providing a conducive habitat for beneficial microbes, which in turn help reduce osmotic stress and ionic toxicity [37]. In sodic soils, where dispersion and poor structure are the dominant constraints, biochar plays a different role. Its carbonaceous particles and associated cations (especially Ca2+, Mg2+, and K+ released from biochar ash) help reduce exchangeable sodium percentage and promote flocculation, thereby improving soil aggregation, hydraulic conductivity, and aeration [38]. Furthermore, the alkaline nature of many biochars can buffer soil pH, mitigating the extreme alkalinity often associated with sodicity [39]. Saline-sodic soils, due to the combination of both osmotic and dispersive stresses, often require dual mechanisms of remediation. Here, biochar effectiveness tends to depend on its feedstock and production temperature. For instance, high-ash biochars (e.g., from crop residues or manure) have been shown to provide both salt adsorption capacity and cation release for Na+ displacement, making them more effective than low-ash woody biochars [40] [41]. However, the improvement in soil structure and reduction in salt stress in saline–sodic soils are usually slower and less pronounced compared to their effects in solely saline or sodic soils, highlighting the need for integrated strategies (e.g., combining biochar with gypsum or organic compost) [42]. Overall, while biochar universally improves soil organic carbon content, microbial activity, and nutrient cycling across salt-affected soils, the dominant mechanisms of action—ion adsorption, cation exchange, pH buffering, or structural improvement are strongly soil-type dependent. Tailoring biochar properties (e.g., feedstock selection, pyrolysis temperature, particle size) to match the constraints of specific salt-affected soils is therefore essential for maximizing its remediation potential.

3.3. Harnessing Biochar to Mitigate Abiotic Stress in Plants

To combat abiotic stress challenges, various strategies are being employed, with biochar (BC) emerging as a widely used soil amendment that can improve soil health and enhance crop yield under stress conditions. Soil salinization negatively impacts crop productivity and biochar has emerged as a potential solution to mitigate its harmful effects. Biochar, a carbon-rich material derived from biomass, has gained attention as a potentially effective yet inconsistently performing strategy for improving the physical, chemical, and biological conditions of salt-affected soils. While research on biochar is expanding, especially in relation to soil restoration and climate mitigation, further in-depth analysis is needed to clarify its mechanisms, particularly its effects on soil biology and to advance related technologies. To address food security, sustainable strategies for reclaiming and utilizing salt-affected soils are essential. BC enhances soil organic matter, structure, aggregate stability, and nutrient and water retention capacity, while also promoting the activity of beneficial microbes, which collectively help plants better tolerate these stresses. BC also protects membrane stability, enhances water uptake, balances nutrients, reduces reactive oxygen species (ROS), and improves photosynthetic activity, chlorophyll synthesis, and stress-responsive protein activity. This review explores the mechanisms through which BC mitigates drought and salinity stresses in plants and provides insights into how BC can be effectively used to improve stress tolerance in crops [43].

Biochar has shown promise in mitigating these issues by improving soil pH, nutrient uptake, microbial activity, and reducing toxic ion concentrations [44]. By improving nutrient and water uptake, reducing electrolyte leakage, and enhancing antioxidant activity, biochar helps plants counter osmotic, ionic, and oxidative damages caused by salinity stress. Additionally, biochar enhances soil organic matter, microbial activity, and reduces the accumulation of toxic ions, making it a promising tool for alleviating salinity stress and improving plant growth. Under saline conditions, Na+ uptake increases and disrupts nutrient balance, but biochar reduces Na+ absorption, enhancing K+ uptake and improving the K+/Na+ ratio. Its high surface area, porosity, and cation exchange capacity help displace Na+ from soil exchange sites, increasing the availability of beneficial nutrients like K, Ca, and Mg. Biochar also slightly raises soil EC, aiding nutrient release and supporting better plant growth under salinity stress [45].

A greenhouse pot experiment assessed the effects of salinity stress on eggplant growth and yield, as well as the potential of hardwood and softwood biochar to mitigate these effects. The results indicated that biochar improved plant physiology, root and shoot growth, and yield under salinity stress, with no significant difference between the two types of biochar [46]. Biochar application enhances soil carbon sequestration, permeability, fertility, and microbial activity, thereby increasing water retention and nutrient availability, which collectively promote improved plant growth [47]. Zhang et al. (2020) investigate the interactive effects of drought and salinity stress on soybean growth and productivity, focusing on the role of biochar as a mitigating factor [48].

A pot experiment was conducted to assess soybean yield, leaf gas exchange, and water use efficiency (WUE) under these stress conditions with and without biochar amendment. Results showed that both drought and salinity stress significantly reduced soybean growth, flowering time, and leaf gas exchange parameters, with salinity stress causing notable declines in photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, CO2 concentration, and transpiration. Biochar application improved soybean grain yield by 3.1% - 14.8% and enhanced WUE under drought stress, while reducing the negative effects of salinity stress. The study concluded that biochar can effectively alleviate the detrimental impacts of combined drought and salinity stress on soybean growth and productivity, highlighting its potential in sustainable agricultural practices. This study explored the impact of biochar on the growth and productivity of Solanum lycopersicum (tomato) under drought and saline stresses in greenhouse conditions [49]. A three-factorial split-split-plot design was used, with variables including water quality (freshwater vs saline water), irrigation levels (40%, 60%, 80%, and 100% of total evapotranspiration), and biochar application (3% by weight). The results revealed that drought and salt stresses negatively affected the plant’s morphological, physiological, and yield characteristics, particularly under low irrigation levels. However, the addition of biochar significantly improved plant height, stem diameter, leaf area, water use efficiency, and tomato yield. Biochar enhanced growth parameters, physiological characteristics, and yield, with the highest improvements in yield observed under freshwater irrigation. This study suggests that biochar application can enhance tomato growth and yield while improving water use efficiency in semi-arid and arid regions.

Another group of researchers has also done greenhouse experiment to assess the effect of biochar amendments on the productivity of tomatoes grown in salt-affected soils. The study, conducted over two growing seasons, tested four biochar application rates (0%, 2%, 4%, and 8% by mass) under saline irrigation conditions. Results showed that saline irrigation significantly reduced tomato yield and quality, but biochar amendments improved vegetative growth, yield, and quality, with the highest biochar rate (8%) providing the most significant benefits. Biochar mitigated salt stress by adsorbing sodium ions and releasing essential nutrients like potassium, calcium, and magnesium into the soil, thereby enhancing tomato production [50].

Salt stress is a major abiotic factor that limits crop production globally, with wheat being one of the most affected crops. This study aimed to investigate the ameliorative effects of biochar on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grown under saline conditions. The wheat varieties FSD08 and PUNJAB-11 were subjected to two levels of sodium chloride (0 mM and 120 mM), along with biochar application at 0% and 5%. Results showed that salt stress negatively impacted wheat growth, yield, and physiological attributes, while biochar significantly improved plant performance by enhancing antioxidant enzyme activities (SOD, CAT, APX, and POD), reducing membrane permeability, and decreasing harmful ion concentrations. Biochar effectively mitigated the detrimental effects of salinity, suggesting its potential as a sustainable solution for crop production in saline environments [51]. Between 2000 and 2019, the frequency of extreme weather events like droughts and floods increased by over 75%, compared to 1980-1999, driven by climate change, resulting in significant deterioration of soil and water quality. At the same time, the growing human population has placed additional pressure on soil and water resources due to overuse and mismanagement. This review explores the damage caused to soil-plant systems by extreme weather events and discusses how biochar, with its beneficial properties such as high cation exchange capacity, water retention, and nutrient holding capacity, can help restore the damaged systems. Biochar has the potential to improve soil fertility, enhance crop productivity, and mitigate greenhouse gas emissions, offering a sustainable solution for areas affected by extreme weather. The paper also suggests future strategies to promote biochar’s use in mitigating the adverse effects of extreme weather on soil-plant systems [52].

Salt-affected soils require urgent remediation to achieve carbon neutrality and ensure food security. Limited reviews are available on the role of biochar in remediating salt-affected soils, particularly in the context of carbon neutrality and climate change mitigation. This review highlights two pathways for achieving carbon neutrality while remediating salt-affected soils using biochar: 1) producing biochar from sustainable feedstocks via thermal technologies and 2) applying biochar to enhance plant productivity and mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Converting biomass waste into biochar can help reduce GHG emissions and facilitate carbon dioxide removal (CDR), with the collection of halophyte biomass as biochar feedstock and the development of biochar poly-generation production systems being promising strategies. Biochar has been shown to improve plant growth in salt-affected soils by enhancing physicochemical characteristics, shifting microbial communities, and boosting plant halotolerance, with an average increase in plant productivity of 29.3%. Additionally, biochar can mitigate GHG emissions by inducing negative priming effects, improving soil properties, and altering microbial communities related to carbon and nitrogen cycles. However, biochar may also have negative effects on plant growth due to the presence of toxic compounds and free radicals, which can deteriorate soil properties. Promoted GHG emissions are mainly attributed to positive priming effects and the release of labile carbon and inorganic nitrogen fractions as microbial substrates. This review identifies gaps in current research and outlines future directions, such as the development of “carbon-neutral” or “carbon-negative” biochar production systems, balancing biochar’s effectiveness with its environmental risks and costs, and designing biochar-based GHG adsorbents to remediate salt-affected soils, achieve carbon neutrality, and help mitigate climate change [53].

The application of 5% and 10% biochar under saline conditions enhanced plant growth, improving parameters like plant height, leaf area, and fresh and dry weight, with the 10% biochar dose showing the most significant improvements. Biochar also reduced oxidative and osmotic stresses by decreasing the activities of key enzymes and stress markers, making it a promising strategy for mitigating salinity effects on tomato seedlings [9].

Yuan et al. 2023 [54] reviewed the role of biochar in enhancing salt-affected soil health, highlighting its ability to improve soil properties such as aggregate stability (15.0% - 34.9%), porosity (8.9%), water retention capacity (7.8% - 18.2%), cation exchange capacity (21.1%), soil organic carbon (63.1%), and nutrient availability (31.3% - 39.9%), while also reducing bulk density (6.0%) and alleviating salt stress (4.1% - 40.0%). Biochar also benefits soil biology by increasing microbial biomass (7.1% - 25.8%), stimulating enzyme activity (20.2% - 68.9%), and promoting plant growth. To better assess the health of salt-affected soils, it is crucial to use indicators that reflect ecological services, such as plant productivity, water quality, climate change mitigation, and human health. This approach will improve soil health evaluation and provide a more comprehensive understanding of soil multifunctionality.

Ud Din et al. (2023) [55] evaluated the effects of compost and biochar amendments on tomato growth and fruit quality under salinity stress, showing that both amendments significantly improved plant growth, reduced sodium accumulation, and mitigated salinity-induced physiological stress. The combined application of compost and biochar notably enhanced tomato plant growth, alleviated salinity toxicity, and improved productivity, making it a promising approach for cultivating crops in saline soils.

Kanwal et al. (2018) [56] evaluated the impact of 1% and 2% biochar on wheat seed germination and growth under salinity stress, finding that both levels improved germination and growth, with 2% biochar being more effective. The 2% biochar treatment led to increased root and shoot length, improved leaf water and osmotic potential, and a reduction in proline and soluble sugar content, ultimately enhancing wheat productivity under saline conditions.

Economic Feasibility of Biochar Application in Salt-Affected Regions

While biochar demonstrates clear agronomic and environmental benefits in salt-affected soils, its adoption by farmers is often constrained by economic considerations. The initial investment cost of biochar production or purchase can be relatively high, particularly when derived from specialized pyrolysis systems or when transportation to farms is required [57]. These upfront costs pose a barrier for smallholder farmers in salt-affected regions, where input affordability is a critical determinant of technology adoption. However, when considered over the medium to long term, biochar application offers substantial economic advantages. By improving soil structure, reducing salinity-induced stress, and enhancing nutrient and water retention, biochar contributes to higher crop yields and greater yield stability under stress conditions [58]. Furthermore, biochar can generate co-benefits beyond direct yield gains, including reduced fertilizer requirements through improved nutrient use efficiency, and potential income streams from carbon markets or environmental credit schemes where biochar is recognized as a carbon sequestration tool [59]. These additional benefits improve the cost-benefit balance for farmers, particularly when policy or market mechanisms support the valuation of ecosystem services.

3.4. Interaction of Biochar with Dynamic Soil Microbial Communities and Saline Environments

The interaction between biochar and soil microbial communities under saline conditions represents a critical yet underexplored dimension of its efficacy as a soil amendment. Biochar can serve as a microhabitat and energy source for soil microorganisms due to its porous structure, high surface area, and variable chemical composition. These properties facilitate microbial colonization and potentially enhance microbial diversity and activity, which are vital for nutrient cycling, organic matter decomposition, and overall soil health [60]. In saline soils, where microbial communities are often disrupted by osmotic stress and ion toxicity, biochar has been shown to partially ameliorate these conditions by adsorbing excess sodium ions and improving the soil’s physical environment, thus creating a more hospitable niche for beneficial microbial populations [45]. However, the influence of biochar on microbial dynamics in saline soils is not universally beneficial and may vary depending on the biochar’s properties (e.g., pH, electrical conductivity, and aromaticity), the native microbial community, and the degree of salinity. Some studies report shifts in microbial community composition toward halotolerant species, while others observe enhanced activity of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), which can facilitate plant adaptation to salt stress through mechanisms such as nitrogen fixation, phytohormone production, and 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) deaminase activity. Halotolerant plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (HT-PGPR) produce a variety of secondary metabolites such as osmoprotectants, exopolysaccharides, and volatile organic compounds. These substances play a crucial role in enhancing plant growth and alleviating the negative impacts of salinity stress. The potential of HT-PGPR as a biological approach to counteract the detrimental effects of excessive soil salinity is increasingly acknowledged, as they contribute to improved plant development, productivity, and the restoration of saline-degraded soils [61]. Furthermore, biochar-induced changes in microbial activity can influence the biogeochemical cycling of key nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus, potentially modifying their availability under saline conditions. Nevertheless, there is a paucity of long-term, field-based research evaluating how biochar influences the functional traits and stability of microbial communities over time in salt-affected soils. The potential for biochar to modulate microbe-mediated processes, such as nitrification, denitrification, and organic matter mineralization, under high-salinity regimes remains an important frontier. Future research must employ advanced molecular tools, such as metagenomics and transcriptomics, to unravel the mechanistic pathways through which biochar affects microbial functionality in saline environments. A systems-level understanding of these interactions is essential to optimize biochar formulations and application strategies for enhanced soil resilience and sustainable crop production in saline and climate-stressed agroecosystems. Table 1 provides a general overview of the key physical-chemical properties of biochar and highlights their potential positive and negative effects on plant tolerance to various abiotic stresses.

Table 1. General summary of biochar physical-chemical properties and their positive and negative effects on plant abiotic stress tolerance.

Property

Effect

Positive effects on abiotic stress

Negative effects on abiotic stress

Surface area and porosity

High surface area and porosity improve water retention and nutrient holding capacity

Enhances doil water retention, improves drought tolerance

Excessive water retention can cause poor aeration, affecting root respiration

pH

Typically alkaline(pH 7 - 10), can modify soil pH

Neutralizes acidic soils, improving nutrient availability under stress

May increase soil pH too much, causing micronutrient deficiencies

Cation exchange capacity (CEC)

Increases CEC, enhancing nutrient retention

Improves nutrient availability under salinity and drought stress

May temporary immobilize some nutrients, reducing their availability

Organic carbon content

Stable carbon source improves soil organic matter

Enhances soil structure and moisture retention, improves tolerance to heat and drought

Slow decomposition can limit immediate nutrient release

Electrical conductivity (EC)

Indicates soluble salt content

Moderate EC can improve salt tolerance by regulating ion balance

High EC may increase soil salinity, harming plants

Nutrient content (N, P, K, micronutrients)

Biochar may contain or adsorb nutrients

Supplies or retains nutrients improving stress resilience

Nutrient imbalance if biochar is nutrient poor or adsorbs nutrients excessively

Hydrophobicity

Some biochars can be initially hydrophobic

Can reduce water loss from soil in drought conditions after conditioning

Initially reduces water infiltration, worsening drought stress

Heavy metal adsorption

Adsorbs heavy metals, reducing toxicity

Migrates metal toxicity under stress conditions

Can adsorb beneficial ions reducing their availability

Thermal stability

High stable carbon resists decomposition

Long-term improvement of soil properties helps stress tolerance

Persistence means slow nutrient release, limiting short-term effects

4. Future Perspective

The future role of biochar in mitigating soil salinity and enhancing plant growth under the pressures of climate change warrants critical evaluation within the broader context of sustainable land management and agroecological resilience. While numerous studies have demonstrated the capacity of biochar to improve soil physicochemical properties such as increasing cation exchange capacity, enhancing water retention, and reducing sodium ion toxicity, its effectiveness remains highly content-dependent, influenced by factors including feedstock type, pyrolysis conditions, application rates, soil type, and crop species. Under climate change scenarios, where salinization is intensified by sea level rise, erratic rainfall patterns, and increased evapotranspiration, the potential of biochar to buffer saline stress becomes increasingly relevant. However, the long-term stability and interaction of biochar with dynamic soil microbial communities and saline environments remain insufficiently understood.

Although biochar may improve plant performance through indirect mechanisms, such as modulation of rhizosphere microbial activity and enhanced nutrient use efficiency, these benefits are not universally observed across systems. Unregulated or excessive application to soils with normal fertility can impose chemical stress on crops, adversely affecting agricultural productivity. For example, high-dose biochar amendments in rice (Oryza sativa L.) systems have shown that while certain physical properties of biochar (e.g., from peanut hulls) can be beneficial, application at 5% (w/w) slightly increased grains per spike but significantly reduced spike number per pot and seed-setting percentage [62]. This high-dose treatment also caused declines in both the diversity and stability of soil bacterial and archaeal communities, accompanied by disruptions in microbial metabolic activity and nutrient cycling linked to alterations in the soil carbon-to-nitrogen ratio. These findings underscore the importance of dosage optimization and careful consideration of soil-microbe-plant interactions in biochar application.

Given these contradictory effects, there is a clear need for research to develop standardized protocols for biochar production and application, including optimized feedstock selection, pyrolysis conditions, particle size, and application rates. Standardization can help ensure more predictable and positive outcomes, minimizing potential adverse effects such as increased greenhouse gas emissions or microbial disruption, while maximizing the mitigation of salinity stress. A critical future direction involves moving beyond short-term, controlled-environment studies to robust, long-duration field trials that account for variable climate conditions. Furthermore, the integration of biochar with complementary practices, such as organic amendments, salt-tolerant cultivars, and precision irrigation, should be rigorously assessed to develop holistic strategies for managing salinity in climate-vulnerable regions.

Thus, while biochar holds significant promise for improving soil health and crop productivity under salinity stress, its application must be guided by a nuanced understanding of soil-plant-climate interactions, supported by interdisciplinary research, standardized protocols, and adaptive management frameworks.

5. Conclusion

Abiotic stresses such as drought and salinity are escalating threats to global agricultural productivity, driven by climate change and soil degradation. Biochar has emerged as a promising amendment to alleviate these stresses by improving soil structure, enhancing nutrient retention, and modulating microbial activity; however, its efficacy remains highly variable and context-dependent. While studies highlight biochar’s potential to increase water retention, buffer ion toxicity, and influence microbial communities, the underlying mechanisms, particularly under field conditions and over long timescales, are still poorly understood. High-dose applications may disrupt microbial diversity and metabolic processes, posing risks to soil health and crop yield, especially in sensitive monoculture systems. Moreover, the predominance of short-term, greenhouse-based studies limits our understanding of biochar’s performance in complex, climate-vulnerable agroecosystems. Future research should aim to elucidate how biochar feedstock, pyrolysis conditions, and application rates interact with soil types and microbial communities to shape long-term soil health and crop productivity under abiotic stress. It is also critical to clarify the mechanisms governing biochar’s effects on microbial diversity, nutrient cycling, and greenhouse gas emissions in field conditions over multiple growing seasons. In addition, the development of integrated management strategies that combine biochar with organic amendments, precision irrigation, and salt-tolerant cultivars is needed to create context-specific, climate-resilient agroecosystems. Therefore, while biochar holds substantial promise as a climate-resilient soil amendment, it cannot be viewed as a universal solution. Its use must be guided by integrated, evidence-based land management strategies that consider the complex interactions among soil properties, microbial ecology, plant physiology, and climate variability. Only through such multidisciplinary, precautionary, and context-specific approaches, informed by long-term and mechanistic research, can biochar be effectively harnessed to mitigate abiotic stress and secure sustainable food systems.

Acknowledgements

This article is based upon work from COST ACTION CA22144—Sustainable use of salt-affected lands (SUSTAIN), supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology).

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

[1] Hassani, A., Azapagic, A. and Shokri, N. (2021) Global Predictions of Primary Soil Salinization under Changing Climate in the 21st Century. Nature Communications, 12, Article No. 6663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Rockström, J., Williams, J., Daily, G., Noble, A., Matthews, N., Gordon, L., et al. (2016) Sustainable Intensification of Agriculture for Human Prosperity and Global Sustainability. Ambio, 46, 4-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Hofmann, D.J., Butler, J.H. and Tans, P.P. (2009) A New Look at Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide. Atmospheric Environment, 43, 2084-2086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] FAO Report (2024) The Global Status of Salt-Affected Soils.
https://www.fao.org/newsroom/detail/fao-launches-first-major-global-assessment-of-salt-affected-soils-in-50-years/en
[5] FAO (2021) Global Map of Salt-Affected Soils (GSASmap).
https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/31be1fac-a057-4b6b-80ea-a4554910368c/content
[6] Kundu, S., Perinjelil, S.J. and Thakur, N. (2022) Soil Salinization and Bioremediation Using Halophiles and Halotolerant Microorganisms. In: Santoyo, G., Kumar, A., Aamir, M. and Uthandi, S., Eds., Mitigation of Plant Abiotic Stress by Microorganisms, Elsevier, 231-256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Bratovcic, A. (2024) Different Approaches to Reduce Salinity in Salt-Affected Soils and Enhancing Salt Stress Tolerance in Plants. Agricultural Sciences, 15, 830-847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Anwari, G., Mandozai, A. and Feng, J. (2019) Effects of Biochar Amendment on Soil Problems and Improving Rice Production under Salinity Conditions. Advanced Journal of Graduate Research, 7, 45-63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Kul, R., Arjumend, T., Ekinci, M., Yildirim, E., Turan, M. and Argin, S. (2021) Biochar as an Organic Soil Conditioner for Mitigating Salinity Stress in Tomato. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 67, 693-706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Murtaza, G., Ahmed, Z., Iqbal, R. and Deng, G. (2025) Biochar from Agricultural Waste as a Strategic Resource for Promotion of Crop Growth and Nutrient Cycling of Soil under Drought and Salinity Stress Conditions: A Comprehensive Review with Context of Climate Change. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 48, 1832-1883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Godoy, F., Olivos-Hernández, K., Stange, C. and Handford, M. (2021) Abiotic Stress in Crop Species: Improving Tolerance by Applying Plant Metabolites. Plants, 10, Article 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Nadarajah, K.K. (2020) ROS Homeostasis in Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21, Article 5208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Bratovcic, A. (2020) Antioxidant Enzymes and Their Role in Preventing Cell Damage. Acta Scientific Nutritional Health, 4, 1-7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Apel, K. and Hirt, H. (2004) Reactive Oxygen Species: Metabolism, Oxidative Stress, and Signal Transduction. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 55, 373-399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Munns, R. and Tester, M. (2008) Mechanisms of Salinity Tolerance. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 59, 651-681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Hasanuzzaman, M., Bhuyan, M.H.M., Zulfiqar, F., Raza, A., Mohsin, S., Mahmud, J., et al. (2020) Reactive Oxygen Species and Antioxidant Defense in Plants under Abiotic Stress: Revisiting the Crucial Role of a Universal Defense Regulator. Antioxidants, 9, Article 681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Gupta, B. and Huang, B. (2014) Mechanism of Salinity Tolerance in Plants: Physiological, Biochemical, and Molecular Characterization. International Journal of Genomics, 2014, Article ID: 701596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Parihar, P., Singh, S., Singh, R., Singh, V.P. and Prasad, S.M. (2014) Effect of Salinity Stress on Plants and Its Tolerance Strategies: A Review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22, 4056-4075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Choudhury, F.K., Rivero, R.M., Blumwald, E. and Mittler, R. (2016) Reactive Oxygen Species, Abiotic Stress and Stress Combination. The Plant Journal, 90, 856-867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] You, J. and Chan, Z. (2015) ROS Regulation during Abiotic Stress Responses in Crop Plants. Frontiers in Plant Science, 6, Article 1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Zhao, C., Zhang, H., Song, C., Zhu, J. and Shabala, S. (2020) Mechanisms of Plant Responses and Adaptation to Soil Salinity. The Innovation, 1, Article ID: 100017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Haghpanah, M., Hashemipetroudi, S., Arzani, A. and Araniti, F. (2024) Drought Tolerance in Plants: Physiological and Molecular Responses. Plants, 13, Article 2962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Guan, D., Shi, Z., Zhu, L., Zhu, Y., Dahlgren, R.A. and Ma, L.Q. (2023) Health as a Unifying Concept to Promote Integrated Soil and Environmental Research. Soil & Environmental Health, 1, Article ID: 100001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Murtaza, G., Ahmed, Z., Eldin, S.M., Ali, B., Bawazeer, S., Usman, M., et al. (2023) Biochar-soil-plant Interactions: A Cross Talk for Sustainable Agriculture under Changing Climate. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11, Article 1059449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] An, X., Liu, Q., Pan, F., Yao, Y., Luo, X., Chen, C., et al. (2023) Research Advances in the Impacts of Biochar on the Physicochemical Properties and Microbial Communities of Saline Soils. Sustainability, 15, Article 14439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] Wang, X., Ding, J., Han, L., Tan, J., Ge, X. and Nan, Q. (2024) Biochar Addition Reduces Salinity in Salt-Affected Soils with No Impact on Soil pH: A Meta-Analysis. Geoderma, 443, Article ID: 116845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[27] Bratovčić, A. and Tomašić, V. (2024) Photocatalytic Composites Based on Biochar for Antibiotic and Dye Removal in Water Treatment. Processes, 12, Article 2746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[28] Majidi, A.H. (2025) The Effect of Biochar on Enhancing Soil Fertility, Mitigating Soil Salinity and Promoting Plant Growth: A Review. EQAInternational Journal of Environmental Quality, 67, 51-60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[29] Kavitha, B., Reddy, P.V.L., Kim, B., Lee, S.S., Pandey, S.K. and Kim, K. (2018) Benefits and Limitations of Biochar Amendment in Agricultural Soils: A Review. Journal of Environmental Management, 227, 146-154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Bagheri Novair, S., Cheraghi, M., Faramarzi, F., Asgari Lajayer, B., Senapathi, V., Astatkie, T., et al. (2023) Reviewing the Role of Biochar in Paddy Soils: An Agricultural and Environmental Perspective. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 263, Article ID: 115228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Patel, A., Khare, P. and Patra, D.D. (2017) Biochar Mitigates Salinity Stress in Plants. In: Shukla, V., Kumar, S. and Kumar, N., Eds., Plant Adaptation Strategies in Changing Environment, Springer, 153-182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[32] Wang, H., Gao, B., Fang, J., Ok, Y. S., Xue, Y., Yang, K. and Cao, X. (2018) Engineered Biochar Derived from Eggshell-Treated Biomass for Removal of Aqueous Lead. Ecological Engineering, 121, 124-129.
[33] Chávez-García, E. and Siebe, C. (2019) Rehabilitation of a Highly Saline-Sodic Soil Using a Rubble Barrier and Organic Amendments. Soil and Tillage Research, 189, 176-188.
[34] Yang, A., Akhtar, S.S., Li, L., Fu, Q., Li, Q., Naeem, M.A., et al. (2020) Biochar Mitigates Combined Effects of Drought and Salinity Stress in Quinoa. Agronomy, 10, Article 912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[35] Tang, E., Liao, W. and Thomas, S.C. (2023) Optimizing Biochar Particle Size for Plant Growth and Mitigation of Soil Salinization. Agronomy, 13, Article 1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[36] Lin, X.W., Xie, Z.B., Zheng, J.Y., Liu, Q., Bei, Q.C. and Zhu, J.G. (2015) Effects of Biochar Application on Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Carbon Sequestration and Crop Growth in Coastal Saline Soil. European Journal of Soil Science, 66, 329-338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[37] Agegnehu, G., Bass, A.M., Nelson, P.N. and Bird, M.I. (2016) Benefits of Biochar, Compost and Biochar-Compost for Soil Quality, Maize Yield and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in a Tropical Agricultural Soil. Science of the Total Environment, 543, 295-306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[38] Chaganti, V.N., Crohn, D.M. and Šimůnek, J. (2015) Leaching and Reclamation of a Biochar and Compost Amended Saline-Sodic Soil with Moderate SAR Reclaimed Water. Agricultural Water Management, 158, 255-265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[39] Liang, B., Lehmann, J., Solomon, D., Kinyangi, J., Grossman, J., O'Neill, B., et al. (2006) Black Carbon Increases Cation Exchange Capacity in Soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 70, 1719-1730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[40] Shen, Z., Som, A.M., Wang, F., Jin, F., McMillan, O. and Al-Tabbaa, A. (2016) Long-term Impact of Biochar on the Immobilisation of Nickel (II) and Zinc (II) and the Revegetation of a Contaminated Site. Science of the Total Environment, 542, 771-776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[41] Lashari, M.S., Liu, Y., Li, L., Pan, W., Fu, J., Pan, G., et al. (2013) Effects of Amendment of Biochar-Manure Compost in Conjunction with Pyroligneous Solution on Soil Quality and Wheat Yield of a Salt-Stressed Cropland from Central China Great Plain. Field Crops Research, 144, 113-118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[42] Qadir, M., Schubert, S., Ghafoor, A. and Murtaza, G. (2001) Amelioration Strategies for Sodic Soils: A Review. Land Degradation & Development, 12, 357-386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[43] Wu, Y., Wang, X., Zhang, L., Zheng, Y., Liu, X. and Zhang, Y. (2023) The Critical Role of Biochar to Mitigate the Adverse Impacts of Drought and Salinity Stress in Plants. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14, Article 1163451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[44] Huang, K., Li, M., Li, R., Rasul, F., Shahzad, S., Wu, C., et al. (2023) Soil Acidification and Salinity: The Importance of Biochar Application to Agricultural Soils. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14, Article 1206820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[45] Gao, Z., Ding, J., Ali, B., Nawaz, M., Hassan, M.U., Ali, A., et al. (2024) Putting Biochar in Action: A Black Gold for Efficient Mitigation of Salinity Stress in Plants. Review and Future Directions. ACS Omega, 9, 31237-31253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[46] Parkash, V. and Singh, S. (2020) Potential of Biochar Application to Mitigate Salinity Stress in Eggplant. HortScience, 55, 1946-1955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[47] Zhu, X., Chen, B., Zhu, L. and Xing, B. (2017) Effects and Mechanisms of Bio-Char-Microbe Interactions in Soil Improvement and Pollution Remediation: A Review. Environmental Pollution, 227, 98-115.
[48] Zhang, Y., Ding, J., Wang, H., Su, L. and Zhao, C. (2020) Biochar Addition Alleviate the Negative Effects of Drought and Salinity Stress on Soybean Productivity and Water Use Efficiency. BMC Plant Biology, 20, Article No. 288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[49] Murtaza, G., Usman, M., Iqbal, J., Tahir, M.N., Elshikh, M.S., Alkahtani, J., et al. (2024) The Impact of Biochar Addition on Morpho-Physiological Characteristics, Yield and Water Use Efficiency of Tomato Plants under Drought and Salinity Stress. BMC Plant Biology, 24, Article No. 356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[50] She, D., Sun, X., Gamareldawla, A.H.D., Nazar, E.A., Hu, W., Edith, K., et al. (2018) Benefits of Soil Biochar Amendments to Tomato Growth under Saline Water Irrigation. Scientific Reports, 8, Article No. 14743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[51] Shahzadi, A., Noreen, Z., Alamery, S., Zafar, F., Haroon, A., Rashid, M., et al. (2024) Effects of Biochar on Growth and Yield of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under Salt Stress. Scientific Reports, 14, Article No. 20024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[52] Kumar, A., Bhattacharya, T., Mukherjee, S. and Sarkar, B. (2022) A Perspective on Biochar for Repairing Damages in the Soil-Plant System Caused by Climate Change-Driven Extreme Weather Events. Biochar, 4, Article No. 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[53] Liu, Q., Meki, K., Zheng, H., Yuan, Y., Shao, M., Luo, X., et al. (2023) Biochar Application in Remediating Salt-Affected Soil to Achieve Carbon Neutrality and Abate Climate Change. Biochar, 5, Article No. 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[54] Yuan, Y., Liu, Q., Zheng, H., Li, M., Liu, Y., Wang, X., et al. (2023) Biochar as a Sustainable Tool for Improving the Health of Salt-Affected Soils. Soil & Environmental Health, 1, Article ID: 100033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[55] Ud Din, M.M., Khan, M.I., Azam, M., Ali, M.H., Qadri, R., Naveed, M., et al. (2023) Effect of Biochar and Compost Addition on Mitigating Salinity Stress and Improving Fruit Quality of Tomato. Agronomy, 13, Article 2197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[56] Kanwal, S., Ilyas, N., Shabir, S., Saeed, M., Gul, R., Zahoor, M., et al. (2017) Application of Biochar in Mitigation of Negative Effects of Salinity Stress in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Journal of Plant Nutrition, 41, 526-538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[57] Jeffery, S., Abalos, D., Spokas, K.A. and Verheijen, F.G.A. (2015) Biochar Effects on Crop Yield. In: Lehmann, J. and Joseph, S., Eds., Biochar for Environmental Management: Science, Technology and Implementation (2nd Edition), Routledge, 301-326.
[58] Akhtar, S.S., Andersen, M.N. and Liu, F. (2015) Biochar Mitigates Salinity Stress in Potato. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 201, 368-378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[59] Woolf, D., Amonette, J.E., Street-Perrott, F.A., Lehmann, J. and Joseph, S. (2010) Sustainable Biochar to Mitigate Global Climate Change. Nature Communications, 1, Article No. 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[60] Bolan, S., Sharma, S., Mukherjee, S., Kumar, M., Rao, C.S., Nataraj, K.C., et al. (2024) Biochar Modulating Soil Biological Health: A Review. Science of the Total Environment, 914, Article ID: 169585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[61] Kumar, V., Raghuvanshi, N., Pandey, A.K., Kumar, A., Thoday-Kennedy, E. and Kant, S. (2023) Role of Halotolerant Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria in Mitigating Salinity Stress: Recent Advances and Possibilities. Agriculture, 13, Article 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[62] Zhu, N., Yu, Q., Song, L. and Sheng, H. (2023) The Inhibiting Effects of High-Dose Biochar Application on Soil Microbial Metagenomics and Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Production. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24, Article 15043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Copyright © 2025 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.