A Comprehensive Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Probiotics in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Feruza Abraamyan, Neeladri Misra

Sutter Roseville Medical Center, Roseville, California, USA.

DOI: 10.4236/ojgas.2024.146024                

Abstract

Introduction: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) affects approximately 7 million people worldwide. In the U.S. alone, per the CDC, 1.3% of adults, which is approximately 3,000,000 people, are diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease-either, Crohn’s disease, or ulcerative colitis. The estimated cost of treatment can be close to $23,000 annually, with treatment regimens comprising biologic agents and anti-inflammatory therapies. Probiotics have recently gathered interest as a low-cost additional therapy option that, in addition to the current regimen of IBD management, allows for reductions in rates of IBD flare-ups by significantly reducing the number of emergency room visits and avoiding the need to constantly escalate treatment by addition of biologic agents in achieving remission. The Analysis Goal: Our research project aimed to see if there was a significant difference in the addition of probiotics to standard therapy in inflammatory bowel disease by comparing existing research studies and trials. We analyzed RCTs published in PubMed to assess the efficacy and safety of probiotics in patients with IBD in preventing frequent disease flare-ups and reducing the cost of care. Research Methods: We did a comparative analysis of available RCTs using a PubMed search and included studies that researched the addition of probiotic strains in patients with IBD (ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease). After reviewing the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the trials selected for analysis were reviewed by two independent reviewers. Results: We analyzed 21 RCTs, and 16 RCTs (76.2%) showed that probiotics are an effective therapy for IBD, inducing remission and reducing flare-up rates in patients on a standard treatment regimen. Conclusion: Probiotics given in combination with standard therapy in IBD are effective in decreasing disease activity rates and reducing remission rates. No significant adverse reactions to probiotics were noticed.

Keywords

Probiotics, Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Crohn’s Disease, Ulcerative Colitis, Remission Rates

1. Introduction

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic inflammatory condition that includes Crohn’s Disease (CD) and Ulcerative Colitis (UC) [1]. Initially, IBD was associated with highly developed countries; however, currently, new cases are seen worldwide, including in Asia and Africa [2] [3]. According to the CDC data, in 2015 in the US, about 3 million adults were reported to be diagnosed with IBD. At the same time, about 7 million people worldwide have IBD, with an estimated cost of treatment being almost $23,000, according to the Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation.

Genetics, immunological, and environmental factors combined with intestinal barrier disturbances are considered critical elements in the pathogenesis of IBD. Although the exact etiology of IBD remains unknown, research suggests that gut microbiome changes are considered one of the factors involved in disease progression: an altered immune response triggered by environmental factors targeting gut and gut microbiota in a genetically susceptible individual [4] [5] [6] [7]. At the same time, microbiome products and antigens affect the immune cells and the connection between the epithelial cells, leading to increased susceptibility to inflammation and gut permeability. However, it remains unclear if altered gut microbiome is a cause or a consequence of inflammation in IBD patients [8] [9].

Even though It’s known that prebiotics act on specific bacterial populations and enhance their growth, probiotics are living microorganisms that benefit the host by modifying the intestinal microbiota. Different probiotic strains have been isolated from food culturing, including Lactobacillus species, Bifidobacterium species, non-pathogenic E. coli, Saccharomyces boulardii, C. butyricum, Streptococcus salivarius, and Lactococcus lactis [10]. If taken in addition to the primary therapy, probiotics can change the efficacy of specific drug therapies commonly used in treating patients with IBD, such as anti-tumor necrosis factor-α or steroids.

According to the Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation, while the annual cost of healthcare is approximately 4 times higher for patients with IBD than for non-IBD patients, it keeps rising, with the most significant components being therapeutics (biologics, opioids, and steroids), comorbidities (anemia and psychiatric illness) and emergency room visits. The addition of probiotics to the standard regimen of IBD would allow for decreasing rates of IBD flare-ups, which in turn would lead to significantly reducing the cause associated with the addition of therapies to achieve remission in IBD.

The types and combinations of probiotic strains and whether probiotics should be supplemental or standalone therapy in patients with IBD remain controversial. The primary aim of our research study was to present a systematic review of available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the types of strains, treatment courses, and outcomes in patients with IBD treated with probiotics.

Our review also aims to assess the efficacy and safety of probiotics in patients with IBD. This study was done to assess whether probiotics can be a low-cost addition to standard IBD therapy, with the goal of preventing frequent disease flare-ups and reducing the cost of care.

2. Research Methods

We performed a PubMed search on randomized controlled trial studies from 1997 to 2022, using the following keywords: Probiotics in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. The following criteria were used to perform the comparative analysis of the studies.

Inclusion criteria: All studies included adult patients with IBD 18 years old and above with preserved colon, oral administration of probiotics, RCTs that compared probiotics with placebo or any other non-probiotic intervention, and patients with and without maintenance therapy for IBD.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with prebiotic or symbiotic therapies; patients with subtotal/total colon or ileus removal; the study did not evaluate for objective clinical signs of disease activity or relapse rate; the study did not provide information about the bacterial strains included in probiotic, and the probiotic composition is not easily searchable online, probiotics as part of dairy produce-yogurt or kefir; probiotics not administered orally; the full text of the trial is not available online.

After discussion, both authors reviewed the studies independently and determined they were eligible if the criteria were met. The study inclusion and exclusion criteria and primary outcomes are outlined in the chart below, Figure 1.

3. Results

Out of 110 RCTs available in PubMed currently after applying keywords, 89 were removed from further analysis after the inclusion-exclusion criteria were used and duplicates were removed. Here, we reviewed data from the following probiotics (Table 1) and summarized the results of 21 selected RCTs, including 1948 patients in Table 2.

We examined the type and composition of bacterial strains included in probiotics, the treatment course, and the number of patients involved in the trial. We also evaluated outcomes such as disease activity index in treatment versus control groups, recurrence rates in treatment versus control groups, and adverse reactions.

Our analysis shows that out of 21 total RCTs—a total of 16 RCTs (76.2%) proved that probiotics are an effective therapy in patients with IBD to induce

Legend: RCT—Randomized Controlled Trials, IBD-Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Figure 1. Summary of research method analysis.

Table 1. The name and bacterial strains of probiotics included in the analysis:

Name of the probiotic	Bacterial strains included in the composition of probiotic
Bifico	Bifidobacterium longum, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Enterococcus faecalis
VSL#3	4 strains of Lactobacillus, 3 strains of Bifidobacterium, and 1 strain of Streptococcus salivarius
Bio-Three	Streptococcus faecalis T-110, Clostridium butyricum TO-A, and Bacillus mesentericus TO-A
Probio-Tec AB-25	Lactobacillus acidophilus La-5 and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12
BB536	Bifidobacterium longum 536
NA	Saccharomyces boulardii
NA	a combination of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species
NA	a combination of Lactobacillus salivarius, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Bifidobacterium bifidus strain BGN4
NA	Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain GG
NA	Saccharomyces boulardii
NA	Escherichia coli Nissle 1917

Legend: NA-not available.

Table 2. Summary of data from 21 RCTs selected and included in analysis.

Trial	Name of probiotic if available and include bacterial strains	Treatment regimen	Therapy outcomes	Adverse reactions
Fan H et al., [11]	Bifico: Bifidobacterium longum, Lactobacillus acidophilus and Enterococcus faecalis	both treatment groups were on a pentasa (mesalamine extended action tablet) regimen; the treatment group was given additionally 2 probiotics tablets	CDAI/UCAI scores and recurrence rates were significantly lower in treatment group	no difference in adverse reactions between treatment groups
Bibiloni R et al., [12]	VSL#3: 4 strains of Lactobacillus, 3 strains of Bifidobacterium, and 1 strain of Streptococcus salivarius	continued therapy for IBD was allowed if the dose was stable	achievement of remission or response rate in 77% of patients in treatment group	29% of patients: increased bloating; however, the side effect was not severe enough to stop the trial
Bourreille A et al., [13]	Saccharomyces boulardii	probiotic versus placebo	no beneficial effect	diarrhea, arthralgia, constipation, and abdominal pain, 1 oral fungal infection
Agraib LM et al., [14]	9 Lactobacillus and 5 Bifidobacterium species	probiotic versus placebo	significant induction of remission in the treatment group	NA
Palumbo VD, et al., [15]	Lactobacillus salivarius, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Bifidobacterium bifidus strain BGN4	mesalazine versus mesalazine + probiotic	significant induction of remission based on the treatment group	NA
Prantera C et al., [16]	Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain GG	probiotic versus placebo	no significant differences between treatment groups	NA
Guslandi M et al., [17]	Saccharomyces boulardii	mesalamine versus mesalamine+probiotic	significantly lower percentage of patients with clinical relapses in the treatment group	NA
Schultz M et al., [18]	Lactobacillus GG	probiotic versus placebo	no benefit in inducing or maintaining remission in CD patients	NA
Huang M. et al., [19]	Bifico: Bifidobacterium longum, Lactobacillus acidophilus and Enterococcus faecalis	mesalazine versus mesalazine+ probiotic	reduction in UCDAI score was more significant in the treatment group	the incidence rate of adverse reactions was lower in the treatment group
Yoshimatsu Y et al., [20]	Bio-Three: Streptococcus faecalis T-110, Clostridium butyricum TO-A, and Bacillus mesentericus TO-A	continued therapy for IBD + probiotic versus placebo	significantly lower relapse and remission rates in the treatment group	NA
Tursi A et al., [21]	VSL#3: 4 strains of Lactobacillus, 3 strains of Bifidobacterium, and 1 strain of Streptococcus salivarius	5-aminosalicylic acid (ASA) and/or immunosuppressants at stable doses+ probiotic versus placebo	higher decrease in UCDAI scores in the VSL#3 group than in the placebo group	dizziness, flu-like syndrome, abdominal bloating, and discomfort

Continued

Kruis W et al., [22]	E coli Nissle 1917	probiotic versus mesalazine 500 mg three times daily	Probiotics are safe and effective in remission, equivalent to the gold standard mesalazine in patients with ulcerative colitis.	non-intestinal adverse events were viral infections (EcN 4.9%, mesalazine 4.2%), nausea (3.1%, 3.0%), and headache (1.9%, 0.6%)
Zocco MA et al., [23]	Lactobacillus GG	Lactobacillus GG versus mesalazine versus Lactobacillus GG + mesalazine	probiotic considered to be effective and safe for maintaining remission	NA
Cui HH et al., [24]	Bifico: Bifidobacterium longum, Lactobacillus acidophilus and Enterococcus faecalis	probiotic versus placebo	lower relapse rate in the probiotic group	NA
Sood A. et al., [25]	VSL#3: 4 strains of Lactobacillus, 3 strains of Bifidobacterium, and 1 strain of Streptococcus salivarius	continued therapy for IBD + probiotic versus placebo	50% decrease in UCDAI at week 6 and clinical remission at week 12 in the treatment group	NA
Petersen AM et al., [26]	Escherichia coli Nissle 1917	probiotic or placebo after pre-treatment with ciprofloxacin or placebo	no benefit in the use of E. coli Nissle as an add-on treatment to conventional therapies for active ulcerative colitis.	NA
Rembacken BJ et al., [27]	Escherichia coli Nissle 1917	probiotic versus placebo	treatment with a non-pathogenic E. coli has an equivalent effect to mesalazine in maintaining remission of ulcerative colitis.	NA
Wildt S et al., [28]	Probio-Tec AB-25: Lactobacillus acidophilus La-5 and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12	probiotic versus placebo	no significant clinical benefit	NA
Tamaki H et al., [29]	BB536: Bifidobacterium longum 536	continued therapy for IBD + probiotic versus placebo	supplementation with BB536 was well tolerated and reduced UCDAI scores	no serious adverse events were reported
Kruis W et al., [30]	Escherichia coli Nissle 1917	probiotic versus mesalazine	results of treatment with probiotics very equivalent to treatment with mesalazine	no serious adverse events were reported
Tursi A. et al., [31]	VSL#3: 4 strains of Lactobacillus, 3 strains of Bifidobacterium, and 1 strain of Streptococcus salivarius	receive low-dose balsalazide plus VLS#3 versus medium-dose balsalazide alone versus mesalazine alone	balsalazide/VSL#3 combination was faster in obtaining remission than balsalazide alone or mesalazine	no serious adverse events were reported

Legend: CD-Crohn’s Disease; CDAI-Crohn’s Disease Activity Index; IBD-inflammatory bowel disease, NA-Not Applicable since data were not provided, UC-Ulcerative Colitis; UCAI-Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index.

remission rates. In the analysis, 13 out of 16 RCTs (61.9%) showed decreased disease activity scores or recurrence rates in probiotic versus placebo groups. In these studies, the probiotics used were: Bifico: Bifidobacterium longum, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Enterococcus faecalis (4 studies); VSL#3: four strains of Lactobacillus, three strains of Bifidobacterium, and one strain of Streptococcus salivarius subsp. Thermophilus (3 studies); a combination of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species (2 studies); Saccharomyces boulardii (1 study); Bio-Three: Streptococcus faecalis T-110, Clostridium butyricum TO-A, and Bacillus mesentericus TO-A (1 study); Lactobacillus GG (1 study); BB536: Bifidobacterium longum 536 (1 study).

Out of 16 studies with the beneficial effect of probiotics in the treatment group, in 10 studies, 62.5% of patients continued their standard treatment regimen for IBD as long as medication doses were stable and probiotics were given as supplemental therapy. At the same time, no significant adverse reactions to probiotics were noticed.

2 studies out of 16 RCTs (9.5%) showed that the E. coli Nissle 1917 probiotic is equivalent in maintaining remission to the gold standard of treatment with mesalazine in patients with ulcerative colitis, and 1 study out of 16 RCTs (4.8%) showed that the balsalazide/VSL#3 combination was faster in obtaining remission than balsalazide alone or mesalazine.

5 studies out of 21 RCTs included in our analysis (23.8%) showed no significant clinical benefit from probiotic therapy.

4. Discussion

Over 1 million residents in the USA and 2.5 million in Europe are estimated to have IBD, with substantial costs for health care, not counting the cost of altered quality of life [32]. Recent advances in next-generation sequencing technology have identified alteration of the composition and function of the gut microbiota in patients with IBD, called dysbiosis. Clinical and experimental data suggest that dysbiosis may play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of IBD [33], prompting the initiation of probiotics in patients with IBD.

In our analysis, we searched and analyzed available RCTs published in PubMed to assess the efficacy and safety of probiotics for the induction and maintenance of relapse rates in patients with IBD and to decrease them. According to our analysis, the vast majority of RCTs concluded that probiotics are an effective therapy to decrease remission rates in patients with IBD.

The mechanism of how probiotics can be effective in patients with IBD comes from animal studies. For example, experiments involving genetically engineered animals raised in germ-free environments showed an absence of intestinal inflammation. Interestingly, in a laboratory interleukin (IL)-10 deficient mice, IBD-like intestinal inflammation does not occur without an intestinal bacterial flora. However, an inflammatory response occurs after exposure to the standard microbial environment [34] [35]. In humans, the areas most affected by IBD are gut regions characterized by the highest bacterial populations, such as the terminal ileum and colon. At the same time, antibiotics are helpful in decreasing the severity of active inflammation in patients with IBD [36] [37].

Recent studies have revealed that patients with IBD have decreased concentrations of bifidobacterium and lactobacillus and a significant increase in pathogenic and potentially harmful enterobacteria. The mechanisms through which probiotics benefit IBD patients can be explained in the following ways [36]:

1) Firstly, probiotics inhibit the attachment and invasion of enterotoxigenic and enteropathogenic bacteria to the gut epithelium by competing with microbial pathogens for the limited number of receptors on the surface of epithelia [38].

2) Secondly, probiotics enhance epithelial tight junctions and barrier function by activating the antiapoptotic and inhibiting the activation of the pro-apoptotic pathways, which improves intestinal epithelial cells’ survival in environments rich in pro-apoptotic cytokines [39].

3) Thirdly, probiotics modulate the immune response in intestinal epithelial and mucosal immune cells by downregulating the expression or secretion of various proinflammatory cytokines, such as TNFα, IL1β, interferon-gamma, nitric oxide synthase, and matrix metalloproteinase [40] [41] [42] [43] [44].

4) Lastly, probiotics stimulate the secretion of antimicrobial substances by upregulating defensins, which are impaired in Crohn’s disease [36].

While our analysis showed that probiotics could be an effective supplemental therapy to maintain remission in patients with IBD, we looked deeper into which bacterial strains showed the best outcomes in decreasing order:

VSL#3: Four strains of Lactobacillus, three strains of Bifidobacterium, and one strain of Streptococcus salivarius given as supplemental therapy in 4 studies showed a higher decrease in UCDAI scores in the VSL#3 group than in the placebo group.

Bifico: Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Enterococcus faecalis in 3 studies showed decreased CDAI/UCAI scores and recurrence rates in the treatment group. While CDAI/UCAI scoring systems are built based on such criteria as stomachache, diarrhea, gross blood in stool, fecal incontinence, abdominal hyperalgesia, abdominal mass, and the number of complications, patients in the treatment group reported improvement in their symptoms after initiation of the probiotics.

Bio-Three probiotics containing Streptococcus faecalis T-110, Clostridium butyricum TO-A, and Bacillus mesentericus TO-A showed significantly lower relapse and remission rates in the treatment group in 1 RCT.

Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species combo in 2 studies showed significant remission induction in the treatment group, and in 1 study—no significant clinical benefit [28].

In 3 trials, the E. coli Nissle 1917 probiotic was safe and effective in maintaining remission equivalent to the gold standard mesalazine in patients with ulcerative colitis. However, in 1 trial, there was no benefit in using E. coli Nissle as an add-on treatment to conventional therapies for active ulcerative colitis.

Saccharomyces boulardii alone did not show any beneficial effect in one study, but in another, it significantly lowered the percentage of patients with clinical relapses in the treatment group.

Lactobacillus alone in 2 trials didn’t show significant differences between treatment groups; however, in one trial, probiotics were considered effective and safe for remission.

BB536: Bifidobacterium longum 536 alone in 1 trial showed that probiotic supplementation was well tolerated and reduced UCDAI scores.

In other words, probiotics administered with Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Streptococcus, or Enterococcus species show the best outcomes in decreasing disease activity and reducing remission rates, which correlates with most available literature data.

Our analysis had such limitations as not all trials had appropriate randomization of patients based on disease activity scores, laboratory and endoscopy findings before initiation of trial; sex and race of patients involved in RCTs varied broadly across studies, while some trials included patients on the continued regimen for IBD with probiotic being a supplemental therapy, other trials evaluated patients being only on monotherapy with probiotics or placebo number of patients; no gold equivocal stratified system accessing outcomes in patients with IBD and UC, with some studies using the short or full version of Ulcerative Colitis/Crohn’s Disease Activity Index (UCAI/CDAI) or Mayo systems, not using them at all or using another scoring system; objective evaluation of laboratory data and gut mucosa with endoscopy after trial completion was not performed in all trials as well; our analysis only included RCTs from PubMed.

It is essential to notice that in RCTs where probiotics showed a positive effect on decreasing relapse rates, they were given as supplemental therapy to conventional standard therapy for IBD treatment. That confirms that probiotics are not a stand-alone treatment for IBD, but they have proven potential to prolong remission and decrease relapse rates in patients with IBD.

The average admission cost for IBD patients varies significantly depending on factors such as the severity of the condition, the type of treatment required, and the duration of hospitalization. In the United States, for example, the average cost of hospital admission for IBD can range from several thousand to tens of thousands of dollars, depending on whether the patient requires surgery, specialized treatments, or prolonged hospital stays.

The opportunity to decrease relapse rate by adding probiotics would allow for avoiding hospitalization in patients with IBD, thus saving significant amounts of dollars for the patient and the healthcare system in general.

While probiotic therapy is safe and effective in managing patients with IBD, the absence of significant adverse reactions makes it a desirable supplement to decrease disease activity, prolong remission, and improve outcomes. However, we are advocating for the need to perform and analyze more standardized randomized controlled studies assessing the role of probiotics in patients with IBD.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

[1]	Jakubczyk, D., Leszczyńska, K. and Górska, S. (2020) The Effectiveness of Probiotics in the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD)—A Critical Review. Nutrients, 12, Article 1973. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12071973
[2]	Ng, S.C. (2015) Emerging Leadership Lecture: Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Asia: Emergence of a “Western” Disease. The Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 30, 440-445. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.12859
[3]	Chou, J.W., Lai, H.C., Chang, C.H., Cheng, K.S., Feng, C.L. and Chen, T.W. (2019) Epidemiology and Clinical Outcomes of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Hospital-Based Study in Central Taiwan Region. Gastroenterology Research and Practice, 2019, Article 4175923. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4175923
[4]	Khan, I., Ullah, N., Zha, L., Bai, Y., Khan, A., Zhao, T., Che, T. and Zhang, C. (2019) Alteration of Gut Microbiota in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD): Cause or Consequence? IBD Treatment Targeting the Gut Microbiome. Pathogens, 8, Article 126. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens8030126
[5]	Foster, A. and Jacobson, K. (2013) Changing Incidence of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Environmental Influences and Lessons Learned from the South Asian Population. Frontiers in Pediatrics, 1, Article 34. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2013.00034
[6]	Sekirov, I., Russell, S.L., Antunes, L.C.M. and Finlay, B.B. (2010) Gut Microbiota in Health and Disease. Physiological Reviews, 90, 859-904. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00045.2009
[7]	De Souza, H.S. and Fiocchi, C. (2016) Immunopathogenesis of IBD: Current State of the Art. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 13, 13-27. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2015.186
[8]	Rosen, C.E. and Palm, N.W. (2018) Navigating the Microbiota Seas: Triangulation Finds a Way Forward. Cell Host and Microbe, 23, 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2017.12.015
[9]	Gkouskou, K., Deligianni, C., Tsatsanis, C. and Eliopoulos, A.G. (2014) The Gut Microbiota in Mouse Models of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, 4, Article 28. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2014.00028
[10]	Damaskos, D. and Kolios, G. (2008) Probiotics, and Prebiotics in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Microflora ‘On the Scope’. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 65, 453-467. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2008.03096.x
[11]	Fan, H., Du, J., Liu, X., Zheng, W.W., Zhuang, Z.H., Wang, C.D. and Gao, R. (2019) Effects of Pentasa-Combined Probiotics on the Microflora Structure and Prognosis of Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, 30, 680-685. https://doi.org/10.5152/tjg.2019.18426
[12]	Bibiloni, R., Fedorak, R.N., Tannock, G.W., Madsen, K.L., Gionchetti, P., Campieri, M., De Simone, C. and Sartor, R.B. (2005) VSL#3 Probiotic-Mixture Induces Remission in Patients with Active Ulcerative Colitis. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 100, 1539-1546. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.41794.x
[13]	Bourreille, A., Cadiot, G., Le Dreau, G., Laharie, D., Beaugerie, L., Dupas, J.L., Marteau, P., Rampal, P., Moyse, D., Saleh, A., Le Guern, M.E. and Galmiche, J.P. (2013) FLORABEST Study Group. Saccharomyces Boulardii Does Not Prevent Relapse of Crohn’s Disease. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 11, 982-987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2013.02.021
[14]	Agraib, L.M., Yamani, M.I., Tayyem, R., Abu-Sneineh, A.T. and Rayyan, Y.M. (2022) Probiotic Supplementation Induces Remission and Changes in the Immunoglobulins and Inflammatory Response in Active Ulcerative Colitis Patients: A Pilot, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study. Clinical Nutrition ESPEN, 51, 83-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2022.08.020
[15]	Palumbo, V.D., Romeo, M., Marino Gammazza, A., Carini, F., Damiani, P., Damiano, G., Buscemi, S., Lo Monte, A.I., Gerges-Geagea, A., Jurjus, A. and Tomasello, G. (2016) The Long-Term Effects of Probiotics in the Therapy of Ulcerative Colitis: A Clinical Study. Biomedical Papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czech Republic, 160, 372-377. https://doi.org/10.5507/bp.2016.044
[16]	Prantera, C. and Scribano, M.L. (2002) Probiotics and Crohn’s Disease. Digestive and Liver Disease, 34, 66-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1590-8658(02)80168-2
[17]	Guslandi, M., Mezzi, G., Sorghi, M. and Testoni, P.A. (2000) Saccharomyces Boulardii in Maintenance Treatment of Crohn’s Disease. Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 45, 1462-1464. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005588911207
[18]	Schultz, M., Timmer, A., Herfarth, H.H., Sartor, R.B., Vanderhoof, J.A. and Rath, H.C. (2004) Lactobacillus GG in Inducing and Maintaining Remission of Crohn’s disease. BMC Gastroenterology, 4, Article 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-4-5
[19]	Huang, M., Chen, Z.Q., Lang, C., Chen, J., Yang, B., Xue, L. and Zhang, Y. (2018) Efficacy of Mesalazine in Combination with Bifid Triple Viable Capsules on Ulcerative Colitis and the Resultant Effect on the Inflammatory Factors. Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 31, 2891-2895.
[20]	Yoshimatsu, Y., Yamada, A., Furukawa, R., Sono, K., Osamura, A., Nakamura, K., Aoki, H., Tsuda, Y., Hosoe, N., Takada, N. and Suzuki, Y. (2015) Effectiveness of Probiotic Therapy for the Prevention of Relapse in Patients with Inactive Ulcerative Colitis. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 21, 5985-5994. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i19.5985
[21]	Tursi, A., Brandimarte, G., Papa, A., Giglio, A., Elisei, W., Giorgetti, G.M., Forti, G., Morini, S., Hassan, C., Pistoia, M.A., Modeo, M.E., Rodino’, S., D’Amico, T., Sebkova, L., Sacca’, N., Di Giulio, E., Luzza, F., Imeneo, M., Larussa, T., Di Rosa, S., Annese, V., Danese, S. and Gasbarrini, A. (2010) Treatment of Relapsing Mild-to-Moderate Ulcerative Colitis with the Probiotic VSL#3 as Adjunctive to a Standard Pharmaceutical Treatment: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Con-trolled Study. The American Journal of Gastroenterology, 105, 2218-2227. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2010.218
[22]	Kruis, W., Fric, P., Pokrotnieks, J., Lukás, M., Fixa, B., Kascák, M., Kamm, M.A., Weismueller, J., Beglinger, C., Stolte, M., Wolff, C. and Schulze, J. (2004) Maintaining Remission of Ulcerative Colitis with the Probiotic Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 Is as Effective as with Standard Mesalazine. Gut, 53, 1617-1623. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2003.037747
[23]	Zocco, M.A., Dal Verme, L.Z., Cremonini, F., Piscaglia, A.C., Nista, E.C., Candelli, M., Novi, M., Rigante, D., Cazzato, I.A., Ojetti, V., Armuzzi, A., Gasbarrini, G. and Gasbarrini, A. (2006) Efficacy of Lactobacillus GG in Maintaining Remission of Ulcerative Colitis. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 23, 1567-1574. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.02927.x
[24]	Cui, H.H., Chen, C.L., Wang, J.D., Yang, Y.J., Cun, Y., Wu, J.B., Liu, Y.H., Dan, H.L., Jian, Y.T. and Chen, X.Q. (2004) Effects of Probiotic on Intestinal Mucosa of Patients with Ulcerative Colitis. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 10, 1521-1525. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v10.i10.1521
[25]	Sood, A., Midha, V., Makharia, G.K., Ahuja, V., Singal, D., Goswami, P. and Tandon, R.K. (2009) The Probiotic Preparation, VSL#3 Induces Remission in Patients with Mild-to-Moderately Active Ulcerative Colitis. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 7, 1202-1209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2009.07.016
[26]	Petersen, A.M, Mirsepasi, H., Halkjær, S.I., Mortensen, E.M., Nordgaard-Lassen, I. and Krogfelt, K.A. (2014) Ciprofloxacin and Probiotic Escherichia coli Nissle Add-on Treatment in Active Ulcerative Colitis: A Double-Blind, Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. Journal of Crohn’s & Colitis, 8, 1498-1505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crohns.2014.06.001
[27]	Rembacken, B.J., Snelling, A.M., Hawkey, P.M., Chalmers, D.M. and Axon, A.T. (1999) Non-Pathogenic Escherichia coli versus Mesalazine for the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis: A Randomized Trial. The Lancet, 354, 635-639. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(98)06343-0
[28]	Wildt, S., Nordgaard, I., Hansen, U., Brockmann, E. and Rumessen, J.J. (2011) A Randomized, Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial with Lactobacillus acidophilus La-5 and Bifidobacterium animalis Subsp. Lactis BB-12 for Maintenance of Remission in Ulcerative Colitis. Journal of Crohn’s & Colitis, 5, 115-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crohns.2010.11.004
[29]	Tamaki, H., Nakase, H., Inoue, S., Kawanami, C., Itani, T., Ohana, M., Kusaka, T., Uose, S., Hisatsune, H., Tojo, M., Noda, T., Arasawa, S., Izuta, M., Kubo, A., Ogawa, C., Matsunaka, T. and Shibatouge, M. (2016) Efficacy of Probiotic Treatment with Bifidobacterium longum 536 for Induction of Remission in Active Ulcerative Colitis: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Multicenter Trial. Digestive Endoscopy, 28, 67-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/den.12553
[30]	Kruis, W., Schütz, E., Fric, P., Fixa, B., Judmaier, G. and Stolte, M. (1997) Double-Blind Comparison of an Oral Escherichia Coli Preparation and Mesalazine in Maintaining Remission of Ulcerative Colitis. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 11, 853-858. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2036.1997.00225.x
[31]	Tursi, A., Brandimarte, G., Giorgetti, G.M., Forti, G., Modeo, M.E. and Gigliobianco, A. (2004) Low-Dose Balsalazide Plus a High-Potency Probiotic Preparation Is More Effective than Balsalazide Alone or Mesalazine in the Treatment of Acute Mild-to-Moderate Ulcerative Colitis. Medical Science Monitor, 10, 1126-1131.
[32]	Kaplan, G.G. (2015) The Global Burden of IBD: from 2015 to 2025. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 12, 720-727. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2015.150
[33]	Nishida, A., Inoue, R., Inatomi, O., Bamba, S., Naito, Y. and Andoh, A. (2018) Gut Microbiota in the Pathogenesis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology, 11, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12328-017-0813-5
[34]	Katz, J. (2006) The Role of Probiotics in IBD. Gastroenterology & Hepatology (NY), 2, 16-18.
[35]	Rath, H.C., Herfarth, H.H., Ikeda, J.S., et al. (1996) Normal Luminal Bacteria, Especially Bacteroides Species, Mediate Chronic Colitis, Gastritis, and Arthritis in HLA-B27/Human β2 Microglobulin Transgenic Mice. The Journal of Clinical Investigation, 98, 945-953.
[36]	Campieri, M. and Gionchetti, P. (1999) Probiotics in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: New Insights to Pathogenesis or a Possible Therapeutic Alternative. Gastroenterology, 116, 1246-1249. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5085(99)70029-6
[37]	Linskens, R.K., Huijsdens, X.W., Savelkoul, P.H., Vandenbroucke-Grauls, C.M. and Meuwissen, S.G. (2001) The Bacterial Flora in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Current Insights in Pathogenesis and the Influence of Antibiotics and Probiotics. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 36, 29-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/003655201753265082
[38]	Schultz, M., Scholmerich, J. and Rath, H.C. (2003) Rationale for Probiotic and Antibiotic Treatment Strategies in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Digestive Diseases, 21, 105-128. https://doi.org/10.1159/000073243
[39]	Yan, F. and Polk, D.B. (2002) Probiotic Bacterium Prevents Cytokine—In Intestinal Epithelial Cells. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 277, 50959-50965. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M207050200
[40]	Ulisse, S., Gionchetti, P., D’Alo, S., et al. (2001) Expression of Cytokines, Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase, and Matrix Metalloproteinases in Pouchitis: Effects of Probiotic Treatment. The American Journal of Gastroenterology, 96, 2691-2699.
[41]	Furrie, E., Macfarlane, S., Kennedy, A., et al. (2005) Synbiotic Therapy (Bifidobacterium longum/Synergy 1) Initiates Resolution of Inflammation in Patients with Active Ulcerative Colitis: A Randomised Controlled Pilot Trial. Gut, 54, 242-249. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2004.044834
[42]	Schultz, M., Linde, H.J., Lehn, N., et al. (2003) Immunomodulatory Consequences of Oral Administration of Lactobacillus rhamnosus Strain GG in Healthy Volunteers. Journal of Dairy Science, 70, 165-173. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022029903006034
[43]	Schultz, M., Veltkamp, C., Dieleman, L.A., et al. (2002) Lactobacillus plantarum 299V in the Treatment and Prevention of Spontaneous Colitis in Interleukin-10-Deficient Mice. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, 8, 71-80. https://doi.org/10.1097/00054725-200203000-00001
[44]	Dieleman, L.A., Goerres, M.S., Arends, A., et al. (2003) Lactobacillus GG Prevents Recurrence of Colitis in HLA-B27 Transgenic Rats after Antibiotic Treatment. Gut, 52, 370-376. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.52.3.370