A New Fairness-Oriented Packet Scheduling Scheme with Reduced Channel Feedback for OFDMA Packet Radio Systems
Stanislav NONCHEV, Mikko VALKAMA
.
DOI: 10.4236/ijcns.2009.27068   PDF    HTML     5,145 Downloads   9,799 Views   Citations

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a flexible and fairness-oriented packet scheduling approach for 3GPP UTRAN long term evolution (LTE) type packet radio systems, building on the ordinary proportional fair (PF) scheduling principle and channel quality indicator (CQI) feedback. Special emphasis is also put on practical feedback reporting mechanisms, including the effects of mobile measurement and estimation errors, reporting delays, and CQI quantization and compression. The performance of the overall scheduling and feedback re-porting process is investigated in details, in terms of cell throughput, coverage and resource allocation fairness, by using extensive quasistatic cellular system simulations in practical OFDMA system environment with frequency reuse of 1. The performance simulations show that by using the proposed modified PF ap-proach, significant coverage improvements in the order of 50% can be obtained at the expense of only 10-15% throughput loss, for all reduced feedback reporting schemes. This reflects highly improved fairness in the radio resource management (RRM) compared to other existing schedulers, without essentially com-promising the cell capacity. Furthermore, we demonstrate the improved functionality increase in radio re-source management for UE’s utilizing multi-antenna diversity receivers.

Share and Cite:

S. NONCHEV and M. VALKAMA, "A New Fairness-Oriented Packet Scheduling Scheme with Reduced Channel Feedback for OFDMA Packet Radio Systems," International Journal of Communications, Network and System Sciences, Vol. 2 No. 7, 2009, pp. 608-618. doi: 10.4236/ijcns.2009.27068.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] 3GPP RAN Technical Specification Group, “E-UTRA/ E-UTRAN Overall description, stage 2,” Technical Re-port TR 36.300, ver. 9.0.0, June 2009.
[2] 3GPP RAN Technical Specification Group, “E-UTRA/ LTE physical layer—General description,” Technical Report TR 36.201, ver. 8.3.0, March 2009.
[3] 3GPP RAN Technical Specification Group, “Physical layer aspects for evolved UTRA,” Technical Report TR 25.814, ver. 7.1.0, Oct. 2006.
[4] N. D. Tripathi, et al., “Radio resource management in cellular systems,” Springer, 2001.
[5] H. Holma and A. Toskala, Eds., “HSDPA/HSUPA for UMTS–High speed radio access for mobile communica-tions,” Wiley, 2006.
[6] E. Dahlman, et al., “3G evolution: HSPA and LTE for mobile broadband,” Academic Press, 2007.
[7] S. Yoon, C. Suh, Y. Cho, and D. Park, “Orthogonal fre-quency division multiple access with an aggregated sub- channel structure and statistical channel quality meas-urements,” in Proc. IEEE Vehicular Technology Confer-ence (VTC’04 Fall), Los Angeles, CA, September 2004.
[8] Y. Sun, et al., “Multi-user scheduling for OFDMA downlink with limited feedback for evolved UTRA,” in Proc. IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC’06 Fall), Montreal, Canada, September 2006.
[9] I. Toufik and H. Kim, “MIMO-OFDMA opportunistic beamforming with partial channel state information,” in Proc. IEEE International Conference on Communications, Instanbul, Turkey, pp. 5389–5394, June 2006.
[10] T. E. Kolding, F. Frederiksen, and A. Pokhariyal, “Low- bandwidth channel quality indication for OFDMA fre-quency domain packet scheduling,” in Proc. ISWCS’06, Spain, September 2006.
[11] K. I. Pedersen, G. Monghal, I. Z. Kovacs, T. E. Kolding, A. Pokhariyal, F. Frederiksen, and P. Mogensen, “Fre-quency domain scheduling for OFDMA with limited and noisy channel feedback,” in Proc. IEEE Vehicular Tech-nology Conference (VTC’07 Fall), Baltimore, MD, pp. 1792–1796, Sept. 2007.
[12] P. Svedman, D. Hammarwall, and B. Ottersten, “Sub- carrier SNR estimation at the transmitter for reduced feedback OFDMA,” in Proc. European Signal Processing Conf., Florence, Italy, September 2006.
[13] C. Wengerter, J. Ohlhorst, and A. G. E Von Elbwert,” Fairness and throughput analysis for generalized propor-tional fair frequency scheduling in OFDMA,” in Proc. IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC’ 05 Spring), Stockholm, Sweden, May 2005.
[14] S. Nonchev, J. Ven?l?inen, and M. Valkama, “New fre-quency domain packet scheduling schemes for UTRAN LTE Downlink,” in Proc. ICT Mobile Summit, Stock-holm, Sweden, June 2008.
[15] S. Nonchev and M. Valkama, “Efficient packet schedul-ing schemes for multiantenna packet radio downlink,” in Proc. Fifth Advanced Int. Conf. Telecommunications (AICT’09), Venice, Italy, May 2009.
[16] T. E. Kolding, “Link and system performance aspects of proportional fair scheduling in WCDMA/HSDPA,” in Proc. IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC’03 Fall), Orlando, FL, pp. 1717–1723, Oct. 2003.
[17] A. Pokhariyal, K. I. Pedersen, G. Monghal, I. Z. Kovacs, C. Rosa, T. E. Kolding, and P. E. Mogensen, “HARQ aware frequency domain packet scheduler with different degrees of fairness for the UTRAN long term evolution,” in Proc. IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC’ 07 Spring), Dublin, Ireland, April 2007, pp. 2761–2765.
[18] A. Pokhariyal, T. E. Kolding, and P. E. Mogensen, “Per-formance of downlink frequency domain packet schedul-ing for the UTRAN long term evolution,” in Proc. IEEE Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications Conference (PIMRC’06), Helsinki, Finland, Sept. 2006.
[19] D. Chui and R. Jain, “Analysis of the increase and de-crease algorithms for congestion avoidance in computer networks,” Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 1989.
[20] P. Svedman, S. K. Wilson, L. J. Cimini, and B. Ottersten, “A simplified opportunistic feedback and scheduling scheme for OFDMA,” in Proc. IEEE Vehicular Technol-ogy Conference (VTC’04 Spring), pp. 1878–1882, May 2004.
[21] P. Svedman, L. J. Cimini, and B. Ottersten, “Using un-claimed sub-carriers in opportunistic OFDMA systems,” in Proc. IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC’ 06 Fall), Montreal, Canada, September 2006.
[22] S. Sanayei, A. Nosratinia, and N. Aldhahir, “Opportunis-tic dynamic sub-channel allocation in multiuser OFDM networks with limited feedback,” in IEEE Proc. Inform. Theory Workshop, San Antonio, TX, pp. 182–186, Oc-tober 2004.
[23] P. Morgensen, et al., “LTE capacity compared to the Shannon bound,” in Proc. IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC’07 Spring), Dublin, Ireland, April 2007.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.