Proximal Femoral Nailing: Technical Difficulties and Results in Trochanteric Fractures

Janardhana Aithala P, Sharath Rao

Department of Orthopedics, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, India.
Department of Orthopedics, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, India..

DOI: 10.4236/ojo.2013.35044                

Abstract

Background: Proximal femoral nailing in communited intertrochanteric fractures is increasingly becoming popular in view of superior biomechanics and prevention of varus collapse associated with Dynamic hip screw. However, technical difficulties and implant related complications have been described with this technique, thus we need more studies to address these issues. Our study aims to understand technical difficulties involved in proximal femoral nailing, and specifically analyses neck shaft angle at follow-up indicating varus collapse and also to compare results of stable and unstable fractures. Materials and Methods: In this study, patients who presented to the Orthopedic Unit of Dr. TMA Pai Hospital (An associated hospital of Manipal University, Manipal) with trochanteric fractures included and treated with proximal femoral nailing. The technical difficulties involved with surgical procedure and techniques adapted to overcome such difficulties were recorded. All patients were followed up for a period of 2 years and final outcome assessment included the number of shortening, neck shaft angle and harris hip score. Results: 41 patients (mean age 71) who underwent proximal femoral nailing from January 2004 to December 2009 were included in the study, 38 patients completed 2-year follow-up. The technical difficulties we faced were divided into 3 categories, difficulties in securing entry point and guide wire placement especially when greater trochanter and piriform fossa were gathered, reduction was lost while passing nail, and finally difficulties faced during placement of hip screws. In all except one, neck shaft angle of more than 130 degrees was achieved, and this was also maintained in the final follow-up (Mean 131.9 degrees). All fractures were united, with mean shortening of 2 mm. Conclusions: Although PFN is technically required, with a proper technique PFN gives excellent clinical results with almost negligible varus collapse even in unstable trochanteric fractures. Regarding the techniques, reaming the proximal part of femur adequately and observing the nail passage with image carefully are important in placing the nail correctly, while, placement of lag screw in the inferior part of neck in anterior posterior projection and central in lateral projection reduces risk of implant failure.

Keywords

Trochanteric Fractures; Proximal Femoral Nailing; Varus Collapse

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	R. Marks, “Hip Fracture Epidemiological Trends, Outcomes, and Risk Factors, 1970-2009,” International Journal of General Medicine, Vol. 3, 2010, pp. 1-17.
[2]	K. P. Chang, J. R. Center, T. V. Nguyen and J. A. Eisman, “Incidence of Hip and Other Osteoporotic Fractures in Elderly Men and Women: Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, Vol. 19, No. 4, 2004, pp. 532-536. doi:10.1359/JBMR.040109
[3]	M. Saudan, A. Lubbeke, C. Sadowskil, N. Riand, R. Stern and P. Hoffmeyer, “Pertrochanteric Fractures: Is There an Advantage to an Intramedullary Nail? A Randomized Prospective Study of 206 Patients Comparing the Dynamic Hip Screw and Proximal Femoral Nail,” Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, Vol. 16, No. 6, 2002, pp. 386-393.
[4]	J. Pajarinen, J. Lindahl, O. Michelsson, V. Savolainen and E. Hirvensalo, “Pertrochanteric Femoral Fractures Treated with a Dynamic Hip Screw or a Proximal Femoral Nail. A Randomized Study Comparing Post-Operative Rehabilitation,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol. 87, No. 1, 2005, pp. 76-81.
[5]	M. R. Baumgaertner, S. L. Curtin and D. M. Lindskog, “Intramedullary versus Extramedullary Fixation for the Treatment of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Vol. 348, 1998, pp. 87-94.
[6]	T. R. C. Davis, J. L. Sher, A. Horsman, M. Simpson, B. B. Porter and R. G. Checketts, “Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures, Mechanical Failure after Internal Fixation,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol. 72, No. 1, 1990, pp. 26-31.
[7]	C. I. Adams, C. M. Robinson, C. M. Court-Brown and M. M. Mcqueen, “Prospective Randomized Controlled Trail of an Intramedullary Nail versus Dynamic Screw and Plate for Intertrochanteric Fractures of the Femur,” Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, Vol. 15, No. 6, 2001, pp. 394-400. doi:10.1097/00005131-200108000-00003
[8]	W. M. Gadegone and Y. S. Salphale, “International Orthopaedics, Proximal Femoral Nail—An Analysis of 100 Cases of Proximal Femoral Fractures with an Average Follow up of 1 Year,” International Orthopaedics, Vol. 31, No. 3, 2007, pp. 403-408.
[9]	M. S. G. Ballal, N. Emms, M. Ramakrishnan and G. Thomas, “Proximal Femoral Nail Failures in Extracapsular Fractures of the Hip,” Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2008, pp. 146-149.
[10]	L. A. Flores, I. J. Harrington and M. Heller, “The Stability of Intertrochanteric Fractures Treated with a Sliding Screw-Plate,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol. 72, No. 1, 1990, pp. 37-40.
[11]	S. H. Bridle, A. A. A. D. Patel, M. Bircher, et al., “Fixation of Intertrochanteric Fractures of the Femur: A Randomized Prospective Comparison of the Gamma Nail and Dynamic Hip Screw,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol. 73, No. 2, 1991, pp. 330-334.
[12]	S. C. Halder, “The Gamma Nail for Peritrochanteric Fractures,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol. 74, No. 3, 1992, pp. 340-344.
[13]	I. B. Schipper, E. W. Steyerberg, R. M. Castelein, F. H. W. M. van der Heijden, P. T. den Hoed, A. J. H. Kerver and A. B. van Vugt, “Treatment of Unstable Trochanteric Fractures, Randomised Comparison of the Gamma Nail and the Proximal Femoral Nail,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol. 86, No. 1, 2004, pp. 86-94.
[14]	T. Morihara, S. Tokugawa, S. Fujita, K. Chatani and T. Kubo, “Proximal Femoral Nail for Treatment of Trochanteric Femoral Fractures,” Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2007, pp. 273-277.
[15]	W. M. Gadegone and Y. S. Salphale, “Short Proximal Femoral Nail Fixation for Trochanteric Fractures,” Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2010, pp. 39-44.
[16]	M. Uzun, E. Ertürer, I. Oztürk, S. Akman, F. Seckin and I. B. Ozselik, “Long-Term Radiographic Complications Following Treatment of Unstable Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures with the Proximal Femoral Nail and Effects on Functional Results,” Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc, Vol. 43, No. 6, 2009, pp. 457-463.
[17]	E. N. Kubiak, M. Bong, S. S. Park, F. Kummer, K. Egol and K. J. Koval, “Intramedullary Fixation of Unstable Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures, One or Two Lag Screws,” Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2004, pp. 12-17. doi:10.1097/00005131-200401000-00003
[18]	M. J. Parker and H. H. G. Handoll, “Gamma and Other Cephalocondylic Intramedullary Nails versus Extramedullary Implants for Extracapsular Hip Fractures in Adults,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, No. 3, 2008, Article ID: CD000093.
[19]	H. Pervez, M. J. Parker, G. A. Pryor and L. Lutchman, “Classification of Trochanteric Fracture of the Proximal Femur: A Study of the Reliability of Current Systems; Nishan Chirodian Injury,” Injury, Vol. 33, No. 8, 2002, pp. 713-715. doi:10.1016/S0020-1383(02)00089-X
[20]	E. M. Evans, “The Treatment of Trochanteric Fractures of the Femur,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol. 31-B, 1949, pp. 190-203.
[21]	W. H. Harris, “Traumatic Arthritis of the Hip after Dislocation and Acetabular Fractures: Treatment by Mold Arthroplasty. An End Result Study Using a New Method of Result Evaluation,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol. 51, No. 4, 1969, pp. 737-755.
[22]	J. Langford and A. Burgess, “Nailing of Proximal and Distal Fractures of the Femur: Limitations and Techniques,” Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, Vol. 23, No. 5, 2009, pp. S22-S25. doi:10.1097/BOT.0b013e31819f2797
[23]	D. M. Lindskog and M. R. Baumgaertner, “Unstable Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures in the Elderly,” Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Vol. 12, No. 3, 2004, pp. 179-190.
[24]	E. T. Su, H. DeWal, R. Sanders, F. J. Kummer, M. Mujtaba and K. J. Koval, “Effect of Piriformis versus Trochanteric Starting Point on Fixation Stability of Short Intramedullary Reconstruction Nails,” Bulletin Hospital for Joint Diseases, Vol. 60, No. 2, 2001, pp. 67-71.
[25]	D. J. Hak and C. Bilat, “Avoiding varus Malreduction during Cephalomedullary Nailing of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Vol. 131, No. 5, 2011, pp. 709-710.
[26]	J. T. Riehl and J. C. Widmaier, “Techniques of Obtaining and Maintaining Reduction during Nailing of Femur Fractures,” Orthopedics, Vol. 32, No. 8, 2009, p. 581. doi:10.3928/01477447-20090624-17
[27]	G. Al-Yassari, R. J. Langstaff, J. W. M. Jones and M. Al-Lami, “The AO/ASIF Proximal Femoral Nail for the Treatment of Unstable Trochanteric Femoral Fracture,” Injury, Vol. 33, No. 5, 2002, pp. 395-399. doi:10.1016/S0020-1383(02)00008-6
[28]	R. K. J. Simmermacher, A. M. Bosch and C. Ven der Werken, “The AO/ASIF Proximal Femoral Nail, a New Device for the Treatment of Unstable Proximal Femoral Fractures,” Injury, Vol. 30, No. 5, 1999, pp. 327-332. doi:10.1016/S0020-1383(99)00091-1