Is the ATIC terminology oriented to nursing phenomena?

Abstract

The main goal of this observational and descriptive study is to evaluate whether the diagnosis axis of a nursing interface terminology meets the content validity criterion of being nursing-phenomena oriented. Nursing diagnosis concepts were analyzed in terms of presence in the nursing literature, type of articles published and areas of disciplinary interest. The search strategy was conducted in three databases with limits in relation to period and languages. The final analysis included 287 nursing diagnosis concepts. The results showed that most of the concepts were identified in the scientific literature, with a homogeneous distribution of types of designs. Most of these concepts (87.7%) were studied from two or more areas of disciplinary interest. Validity studies on disciplinary controlled vocabularies may contribute to demonstrate the nursing influence on patients’ outcomes.

Share and Cite:

Juvé-Udina, M. (2012) Is the ATIC terminology oriented to nursing phenomena?. Open Journal of Nursing, 2, 388-395. doi: 10.4236/ojn.2012.24057.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Thoroddsen, A. and Thorsteinsson, H.S. (2001) Nursing diagnosis taxonomy across the Atlantic Ocean: Congruence between nurse’s charting and the NANDA taxonomy. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 37, 372-81. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02101.x
[2] Ozbolt, J. (2000) Terminology standards for nursing. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 7, 517-522. doi:10.1136/jamia.2000.0070517
[3] Bakken, S., Cashen, M.S., Mendoca, E.A., O’Brien, A. and Zieniewicz, J. (2000) Representing nursing activities within a concept-oriented terminological system: Evaluation of a type definition. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 7, 81-90. doi:10.1136/jamia.2000.0070081
[4] Müller-Staub, M., Lavin, M.A., Needham, I. and van Achterberg, T. (2007) Meeting the criteria of a nursing diagnosis classification. Evaluation of the ICNP, ICF, NANDA and ZEFP. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 44, 702-713.
[5] Bakken. S., Stone, P.W. and Larson, E.L. (2008) A nursing informatics research agenda for 2008-18: Contextual influences and key components. Nursing Outlook, 56, 206-214. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2012.06.001
[6] Ozbolt, J. (2003) ANA recognized terminologies that support nursing practice. http://printfu.org/ozbolt
[7] Coenen, A. and Bartz, C. (2006) A unified nursing language system. Nursing Outlook, 54, 362-364. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2006.09.009
[8] Hannah, K.J., White, P.A., Nagle, L.M. and Pringle, D.M. (2009) Standardizing nursing information in Canada for inclusion in the electronic health records: C-HOBIC. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 16, 524-530.
[9] Ehrenberg, A., Ehnfords, M. and Thorell-Ekstrand, I. (1996) Nursing documentation in patients records: Experience of the use of the VIPS model. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 24, 853-867. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1996.26325.x
[10] Wieteck, P. (2008) Furthering the development of standardized nursing terminology through an ERP-ICNP crossmapping. International Nursing Review, 55, 296-304.
[11] Mac Neela, P., Scott, P.A., Treacy, M.P. and Hyde, A. (2006) Nursing minimum data sets: A conceptual analysis and review. Nursing Inquiry, 13, 44-51. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1800.2006.00300.x
[12] Kleinbeck, S.V. (1999) Development of the perioperative nursing data set. American Operating Room Nurses Journal, 70, 15-18, 21-23, 26-28.
[13] Carrington, J.M. (2012) The usefulness of nursing languages to communicate a clinical event. CIN Computers Informatics Nursing, 30, 82-88. doi:10.1097/NCN.0b013e318224b338
[14] Schwiran, P.M. and Thede, L.Q. (2011) Informatics: The standardized nursing terminologies: A national survey of nurses’ experiences and attitudes—Survey I. The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 16. http://www.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/ANAMarkeplace/ANAPeriodicals/OJIN/TableofContents/Vol-16-2011/No2-May-2011/Standardized-Nursing-Terminologies.html
[15] Trent Rosenbloom, S., Miller, R.A., Johnson, K.B., Elkin, P.L. and Brown, S.H. (2006) Interface terminologies: Facilitating direct entry of clinical data into the electronic health record systems. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 13, 277-288. doi:10.1197/jamia.M1957
[16] Trent Rosenbloom, S., Miller R.A., Johnson K.B., Elkin P.L. and Brown S.H. (2008) A model for evaluating interface terminologies. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 15, 65-76. doi:10.1197/jamia.M2506
[17] Juvé-Udina, M.E. (2005) Development of a clinical assessment system based on the theory of complexity and the nursing science. Nursing (Spanish Edition), 23, 50-55.
[18] Juvé-Udina, M.E. (2012) Philosophical and theoretical foundations for the development and validation of a nursing interface terminology. Part I. Revista de Enfermería, 35, 20-25.
[19] Juvé-Udina, M.E. (2012). ATIC. A nursing interface terminology. Part II. Revista de Enfermería, 35, 48-55.
[20] Juvé-Udina, M.E. (2012) Health, environment and nursing. Philosophical and theoretical foundations for the development and validation of a nursing interface terminology. Part III. Revista de Enfermería, 35, 9-14.
[21] Juvé-Udina, M.E. (2012) Nursing interface terminology: Conceptual framework and interpretative analysis of the nursing process. Nursing (Spanish Edition), 30, 62-66.
[22] Juvé-Udina, M.E., Gonzalez-Samartino, M. and Matud-Calvo, C. (2012) Mapping the diagnosis axis of a new interface terminology to the NANDA International Taxonomy. International Scholarly Research Network Nursing, 2012. doi:10.5402/2012/676905
[23] Juvé-Udina, M.E. (2012) A nursing interface terminology: Evaluation of face validity. Open Journal of Nursing, 2, 196-203. doi:10.4236/ojn.2012.23030
[24] Erdogan, S. and Esin, N.M. (2006) The Turkish version of the Omaha system: Its use in practice-based family nursing education. Nurse Education Today, 26, 396-402. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2005.11.009
[25] Müller-Staub, M., Lunney, M., Odenbreit, M., Needham, I., Lavin, M.A. and van Achterberg, T. (2009) Development of an instrument to measure the quality of documented nursing diagnoses, interventions and outcomes: The Q-DIO. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 18, 1027-1037. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02603.x
[26] Pereira de Melo, R., Venícios de Oliveira Lopes, M., Leite de Araujo, T., de Fatima da Silva, L., Aline Arrais Sampaio Santos, F. and Moorhead, S. (2011) Risk for decreased cardiac output: Validation of a proposal for nursing diagnosis. Nursing Critical Care, 16, 287-294. doi:10.1111/j.1478-5153.2011.00453.x
[27] Gurková, E., Ziaková, K. and Cáp, J. (2011) Content validation of hopelessness in Slovakia and Czech Republic. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications, 22, 33-39. doi:10.1111/j.1744-618X.2010.01173.x
[28] Melo, A.S., Campos de Carvalho, E. and Haas, V.J. (2008) Defining characteristics, validated by specialists and manifested by patients: A study of the sexual dysfunction and ineffective sexuality pattern diagnoses. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 16, 951-958. doi:10.1590/S0104-11692008000600003
[29] Guirao-Goris, J.A. and Duarte-Climents, G. (2007) The expert nurse profile and diagnostic content validity of sedentary lifestyle: the Spanish validation. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications, 18, 84-92. doi:10.1111/j.1744-618X.2007.00056.x
[30] Ferhing, R.J. (1987) Methods to validate nursing diagnosis. Heart & Lung, 16, 625-629.
[31] Cieza, A. and Stucki, G. (2008) The international classification of functioning disability and health: Its development process and content validity. European Journal of Physical Rehabilitation Medicine, 44, 303-313.
[32] Fairbairn, K., May, K., Yang, Y., Balasundar, S., Hefford, C. and Abbott, J.H. (2012) Mapping patient-specific functional scale (PSFS) items to the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Physical Therapy, 92, 310-317. doi:10.2522/ptj.20090382
[33] Gl?ssel, A., Kirchberger, I., Kollerits, B., Amann, E. and Cieza, A. (2011) Content validity of the extended ICF core set for stroke: An international Delphi survey of physical therapists. Physical Therapy, 91, 1211-1222. doi:10.2522/ptj.20100262
[34] Carrillo-Gonzalez, G.M. and Rubiano Mesa, Y.L. (2007) Validation research in nursing diagnosis. Revista Cubana de Enfermería, 23, 1-11.
[35] Argimon, J.M. and Jiménez, J. (2005) Clinical and epidemiological research methods. 3rd Edition, Elsevier, Barcelona.
[36] Juvé-Udina, M.E., Pastor-Maylin, L., Estrem-Cuesta, M. M., Blanco-Aguilar, C., Verge-Monedero, J.M., Coiduras-Charles, A., et al. (2011) What do nurses look after? Cross-sectional study on recent nursing scientific production. Nursing (Spanish Edition), 29, 56-59.
[37] Sewell, J.P. and Thede, L.Q. (2012) Informatics and nursing: Opportunities and challenges. Online Glossary of terms. http://dlthede.net/Informatics/glossary2.html

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.