Share This Article:

Diagnostic CT: Are Patients Adequately Informed?

DOI: 10.4236/act.2012.11001    4,812 Downloads   9,548 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

AIM: CT scanning is a widely utilised effective diagnostic tool. We aimed to establish whether patients are adequately informed prior to undergoing CT investigations. Methods: All adult patients with mental capacity attending the department for a CT study over a week period were invited to fill out a brief questionnaire prior to their scan. Results: 57 patients returned completed questionnaires. Overall 23% of patients were unsure or incorrect about the type of scan scheduled. Of patients attending with a new condition, 46% of them did not know their provisional diagnosis. Only 32 % of patients had insight into how a CT scan worked. This was taken to mean that the patient had included some reference to either x-rays, radiation or cross sectional imaging. Only 23% of patients were aware of potential complications of CT scans. Conclusion: Although written consent prior to CT scan is probably a step too far in providing patients with relevant risks/benefits of their investigation, we propose all patients undergoing CT have prior access to a written information sheet should they wish to be further informed regarding their procedure.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Coyne, J., Brent, A. and O’Farrell, E. (2012) Diagnostic CT: Are Patients Adequately Informed?. Advances in Computed Tomography, 1, 1-4. doi: 10.4236/act.2012.11001.

References

[1] M. Baerlocher and A. Detsky, “Discussing Radiation Risks Associated with CT Scans with Patients,” Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 304, No. 19, 2010, pp. 2170-2171. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.1591
[2] S. Ahn, W. Mayo-Smith, et al., “Acute Nontraumatic Abdominal Pain in Adult Patients: Abdominal Radiography Compared with CT Evaluation,” Radiology, Vol. 225. No. 1, 2002, pp. 159-164. doi:10.1148/radiol.2251011282
[3] J. Brink, M. Goske and J. Patti, “Informed Decision Making Trumps Informed Consent for Medical Imaging with Ionizing Radiation,” Radiology, Vol. 262, No. 1, 2012, pp. 11-13. doi:10.1148/radiol.11111421
[4] R. Semelka, D. Armao, et al., “The Information Imperative: Is It Time for an Informed Consent Process Explaining the Risks of Medical Radiation?” Radiology, Vol. 262, No. 1, 2012, pp. 15-18. doi:10.1148/radiol.11110616
[5] “Good Practice Guide for Clinical Radiologists,” Royal College of Radiologists, London, 2012.
[6] W. Hendee, “Real and Perceived Risks of Medical Radiation Exposure,” Western Journal of Medicine, Vol. 138, 1983, pp. 380-386.
[7] M. Baerlocher and A. Detsky, “Informed Consent for Radiologic Procedures,” Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 305, No. 9, 2011, pp. 888-890.
[8] D. Larson, S. Rader, H. Forman and L. Fenton, “Original Research: Informing Parents about CT Radiation Exposure in Children: It’s OK to Tell Them,” American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 189, No. 2, 2007, pp. 271- 275.
[9] Clinical Radiology Patients’ Liaison Group (CRPLG) of The Royal College of Radiologists. London: The RCR, December 2010.
[10] Care Quality Commission, “Guidance about Compliance Essential Standards of Quality and Safety,” 2010.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.