Phytochemical Composition and Insecticidal Property of Native Plants against the Cowpea Weevil Callosobruchus maculatus Fab. (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) for Natural Preservation of Cowpea Seeds
Elias Mano1,2*, Rabièta Simde2, Koï Wenceslas Kam3, Nadjatou Ouédraogo4, Désiré Dramane Abdoul Khader Sanou5, Rasmané Abdou Ouédraogo1,2, Boubakar Ouattara2, Pierre Alexandre Eric Djifaby Sombié2, Souleymane Nacro2
1Laboratory of Natural Substances and Technologies of Natural Products and the Environment (LABTECH-PRONE), Institute of Research in Applied Sciences and Technologies (IRSAT), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
2Central Horticulture Laboratory of the Regional Center of Excellence in Fruits and Vegetables of Bobo-Dioulasso, Institute of Environment and Agricultural Research (INERA), Bobo Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
3Department of Animal Biology and Physiology, University Joseph Ki-Zerbo, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
4National Agricultural Training School of Matourkou (ENAFA), Bobo Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
5Institute of Rural Development (IDR), Nazi Boni University, Bobo Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
DOI: 10.4236/ae.2024.121005   PDF    HTML   XML   42 Downloads   184 Views  

Abstract

About 80% of cowpea seeds are lost along with 30% of their weight after six months of unprotected storage due to attacks by Callosobruchus maculatus. This study aimed at evaluating the effect of applying bioinsecticides on the biological parameters of C. maculatus to reduce its damage to cowpea stocks. Four treatments including an untreated control and three doses of powdery extracts of C. nigricans, Z. zanthoxyloides and H. suaveolens, were compared in a Fischer block with four completely randomized repetitions. One hundred undamaged cowpea seeds were mixed with doses of each extract in Petri dishes and then fed as food substrates to ten pairs of C. maculatus for eight days. The extracts of H. suaveolens, C. nigricans and Z. zanthoxyloides all contain active ingredients including polyphenols, flavonoids, anthocyanins and alkaloids, etc. The extract of Z. zanthoxyloides was found to be more active on adults (100.00% mortality) followed by C. nigricans (98.75% mortality) and H. suaveolens (97.50% mortality) at 80 mg/g. Fecundity per female decreased significantly in the treated batches of 13.82 eggs for H. suaveolens at 10.12 eggs for C. nigricans at a dose of 80 mg/g. Germination rate of seeds was statistically raised to 100% at 60 and 80 mg/g by C. nigricans powder and lowered to 83.00% at 20 mg/g by Z. zanthoxyloides extracts. The application of Z. zanthoxyloides extract would be a less expensive alternative for the sustainable management of C. maculatus in cowpea stocks.

Share and Cite:

Mano, E. , Simde, R. , Kam, K. , Ouédraogo, N. , Khader Sanou, D. , Ouédraogo, R. , Ouattara, B. , Djifaby Sombié, P. and Nacro, S. (2024) Phytochemical Composition and Insecticidal Property of Native Plants against the Cowpea Weevil Callosobruchus maculatus Fab. (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) for Natural Preservation of Cowpea Seeds. Advances in Entomology, 12, 56-66. doi: 10.4236/ae.2024.121005.

Copyright © 2024 by author(s) and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial International License (CC BY-NC 4.0).

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

1. Introduction

The preservation of cowpea seeds, Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walpers) in traditional storage systems in West Africa is of crucial importance for the nutrition of the rural population [1] . This legume has nutritional benefits of up to 26% protein and 60% to 65% carbohydrates. It is recommended to populations to correct dietary imbalances throughout the world. It is a vital crop during lean periods. In Burkina Faso, the market value of cowpea is high; it contributes to 2 billion FCFA of the GDP and is ranked as 5th among plant crops with a production of 454,840 tons during the 2021-2022 agricultural cropping season [2] .

However, this plant is often attacked during growing and storage stages. The most fearsome of these pests is the Callosobruchus maculatus Fab weevil (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) which can cause losses of nearly 80% of seeds and 30% of weight after six months of unprotected storage [1] [3] . It can also cause economic damage at various stages of plant development [4] .

In order to efficiently protect cowpea harvests against this insect pest, conservationists systematically resort to the application of synthetic insecticides despite evidence of chronic poisoning caused to consumers, pest resistance and negative impact on the environment [5] . Their high cost and short availability hinders African farmers’ businesses [6] [7] . The use of these synthetic insecticides has become a threat to several ecosystems. They could also have a negative impact on predatory arthropods or parasitoids that prey on pests [8] and it is well known that resistance to these insecticides can develop rapidly [9] .

This is why natural substances as alternatives, are considered effective and durable, less toxic and less polluting than synthetic insecticides [10] and give hope for several agricultural stakeholders. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of native plant extracts on the biological parameters of C. maculatus in order to reduce its damage to cowpea seeds during storage.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Animal Material

Eggs, male and female adults of the F1 generation of C. maculatus freshly emerged from mass breeding on undamaged and untreated seeds of V. unguiculata (L.) (Walp.) in the laboratory (T˚: 35˚C; RH: 70% and PP: 12 h) were tested in this study. This seed variety was Koumkalé supplied by NaFaso.

2.2. Extraction of Insecticides

Cassia nigricans leaves Vahl., Zanthoxylum zanthoxyloides (Lam.) and Hyptis suaveolens (L.) Poit. were collected in the city of Bobo Dioulasso. They were dried completely under shade at room temperature (38˚C ± 2˚C) on ventilated racks and reduced to powder using a BLG 450 electric grinder. One hundred grams of each powder was macerated in one liter of water (ratio 1/10; m/v) under mechanical stirring for 24 hours, then aqueous extracts were collected for phytochemical analysis. The essential oils were extracted for two hours by hydrodistillation using an alambic. They were dried with anhydrous sodium sulfate and stored in a refrigerator (T˚: −4˚C) until analysis.

2.3. Experimental Set-Up

One hundred healthy cowpea seeds were first introduced into Petri dishes, of 16 cm × 2 cm. These seeds were then treated with the extracts by mixing at different doses of 20, 40, 60, and 80 mg/g of cowpea. Ten (10) pairs of C. maculatus were finally introduced into each Petri dish and observed for eight days in laboratory conditions (T˚: 38˚C ± 2˚C; RH: 70%; PP: 12 h). The four treatments (C. nigricans, Z. zanthoxyloides, H. suaveolens and the control) were arranged in completely randomized Fischer blocks distributed through four doses and four repetitions. The germination test of the seeds of each batch treated with insecticides was carried out on Petri dishes covered with cotton soaked in water for 4 to 5 days.

2.4. Data Collection and Analysis

The number of C. maculatus adults that died after eight days of treatments was used for the determination of mortality rates after meeting the requirements for analysis of multiple treatment effects. The eggs laid on the seeds were counted under a binocular microscope after 15 days of treatment. Counting the number of germinated seeds from each batch enabled to calculate the germination rates after 15 days of treatment. Data collected were analysed with R 4.2.1 software. The homogeneity of variances was checked with the Bartlett test. Comparison of mortality and germination rates and the number of eggs laid per female of C. maculatus was carried out with the Pairwise test. The non-parametric Kruskal Wallis test was used to check the dose effect of the extracts on the variables “mortality rate”, “seed germination rate” and “number of eggs/female” of C. maculatus.

2.5. Phytochemical Analysis

Chemical screening of plant extracts was carried out by the qualitative method described by [11] . The objective was to highlight the bioactive phytochemical groups involved in the insecticidal activities observed. The essential oils were obtained by hydrodistillation.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Results

3.1.1. Insecticidal Activity on Adults of C. maculatus

Figure 1 indicates significant differences between the doses of studied extracts and the untreated control after 8 days of treatment (df = 12, p-value = 1.776e−06). Doses of Z. zanthoxyloides were found to be more active with 90.00%; 91.25%; 98.75% and 100.00% mortality respectively for doses of 20; 40; 60 and 80 (mg/g). Those of H. suaveolens and C. nigricans followed with respectively 97.50% and 98.75% mortality at 80 mg/g of cowpea seeds. The lowest mortalities of bruchid adults were induced by the control (5.00%). Table 1 indicates significant differences between doses with the exception of 20 mg/g and 40 mg/g in Z. zanthoxyloides and C. nigricans. This table shows that there is no significant difference in mortality between doses of 60 mg/g and 80 mg/g in all extracts.

Figure 1. Analysis of mortality rates of C. maculatus.

Table 1. Comparison of C. maculatus mortalities between treatment doses (Pairwise-t-test).

3.1.2. Effects of Treatments on the Fecundity of C. maculatus

The results show that the reduction effect of the powdered extracts of the plants on females egg laying of C. maculatus on cowpea was significant (df = 12, p-value = 8.402e−05) (Figure 2). Fertility in the control batches was 33.3 eggs/female. It decreased significantly in the treated batches at 13.82 eggs for H. suaveolens at 10.12 eggs for C. nigricans at a dose of 80 mg/g of cowpea seeds. Among all the treatments, C. nigricans powder was found to be more effective in the majority of the tested doses. Table 2 shows significant differences in the numbers of eggs per female between all doses in H. suaveolens; no significant differences were noted in Z. zanthoxyloides. It was similarly observed in C. nigricans with the exception of 20 mg/g dose which was statistically different from the other doses.

Figure 2. Analysis of the number of eggs laid per female of C. maculatus.

Table 2. Comparisons of fecundity (number of eggs/female) of C. maculatus between treatment doses (Pairwise-t-test).

3.1.3. Effect of Extracts on the Germination Power of Cowpea Seeds

The germination power (Figure 3) of the treated cowpea seeds shows a significant difference at 20; 40, 60 and 80 mg/g (df = 12, p-value = 2.407e−06). Cassia nigricans powder promoted the highest germination rates reaching 100% at doses of 60 and 80 mg/g. The lowest germination rates were recorded by the extracts of Z. zanthoxyloides with 83.00% at 20 mg/g of cowpea. Table 3 indicated significant different germination rates between all doses of Z. zanthoxyloides. Germination rates of doses of 20; 40, and 60 mg/g in H. suaveolens were statistically identical. If the doses of 60 mg/g and 80 mg/g caused statistical differences in H. suaveolens, this was not the case in C. nigricans where these two doses were statistically similar.

Figure 3. Analysis of germination rates of treated seeds.

Table 3. Comparisons of germination power (germination rate) of seeds between treatment doses (Pairwise-t-test).

Note: C: Cassia nigricans; Z: Zanthoxylum zanthoxyloides; H: Hyptis suaveolens.

3.1.4. Chemical Profile of Water-Soluble Metabolites

The aqueous extracts of H. suaveolens, C. nigricans and Z. zanthoxyloides contains individually potential bioactive secondary metabolites, namely: polyphenols, flavonoids, Leucoanthocyanidin and alkaloids. Table 4 shows the absence of terpene compounds in H. suaveolens, tannins in Z. zanthoxyloides and essential oils in C. nigricans. The presence of anthraquinones was only evidenced in the extract of H. suaveolens.

3.2. Discussion

This study revealed that extracts of C. nigricans, H. suaveolens and Z. zanthoxyloides all contain polar active ingredients, namely polyphenols, flavonoids, anthocyanins and alkaloids. These same compounds have already been highlighted by [12] and [13] . The presence of anthraquinones and the absence of terpene compounds in the extract of H. suaveolens as well as the absence of tannins in the extract of Z. zanthoxyloides have already been presented by [14] and [15] . These secondary metabolites are responsible for several insecticidal activities: repulsion, mortality, anti-feeding, anti-oviposition, anti-morphogenesis, etc. Some of these metabolites identified in Z. zanthoxyloides include: zanthoxylol [16] , benzophenanthridine, furoquinoline, aporphine alkaloids and several aliphatic amides [17] , pellitorin, [18] ; [19] and several chemical compounds in oils of the genus Zanthoxylum [20] .

The toxicity of the extracts against the development and egg laying of C. maculatus in this study supports [14] and [21] results who reported an influence on the bioactivity of several C. maculatus enzymes. The latter obtained with the hexanic extract of Z. zanthoxyloides 100% mortality of C. maculatus in 24 hours, which is consistent with 100% mortality obtained by [19] using crude powder

Table 4. Chemical composition of extracts.

Note: (−): absence; +: presence.

and methanolic extract of Z. zanthoxyloides as contact insecticide against C. maculatus, Sitophilus oryzae, Oryzaephilus mercator and Rhyzopertha dominica. The volatile compounds and essential oils highlighted in this study would have led to antifeedant activity; these results are already mentioned against the larvae of Spodoptera littoralis [22] and [23] .

The fecundities of adults of C. maculatus were significantly affected by the effects of the different powders treated individually as well as those of the combinations. The results of our work show an average of 33.30 eggs per female in the control batches which significantly decreased in the treated batches by 13.82 eggs for H. suaveolens at 10.12 eggs for C. nigricans at a dose of 80 mg/g of cowpea seeds. Cassia nigricans powder was found to be more effective at all doses. Our results conform to those of [24] and [25] whose results show a difference between the extracts. Authors [26] and [27] attested that treatments based on essential oils of plants considerably inhibit the egg laying of females of C. maculatus.

Application of extracts improves germination power seeds. Indeed, cowpea seeds treated with different powders were significantly less damaged compared to untreated controls. Doses of extracts significantly reduced the damage of C. maculatus, confirming the results of [28] [29] which demonstrated considerable protection of H. suaveolens extracts.

4. Conclusion

This study aimed at evaluating the effect of applying bioinsecticides on the biological parameters of C. maculatus to reduce its damage to cowpea stocks. Extracts of C. nigricans, H. suaveolens and Z. zanthoxyloides possess active ingredients against C. maculatus, an insect pest of cowpea stocks. Zanthoxylum zanthoxyloides extract is more active on adults of the bruchid followed by that of H. suaveolens then C. nigricans. The latter reduced the fecundity of females. Application of extracts improves germination power of cowpea seeds. The application of Z. zanthoxyloides extract would be an alternative for sustainable management of C. maculatus, an insect pest of stored cowpea seeds.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

[1] Dabiré, L.C.B. (2001) Study of Some Biological and Ecological Parameters of Clavigralla tomentosicollis Stäl 1855 (Hemiptera: Coreidae), Cowpea Pod-Sucking Bug [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] with a View to Sustainable Control of the Insect in Burkina Faso. PhD Thesis, University of Cocody, Abidjan, 169 p.
[2] Nadjiam, D. and Touroumngaye, G. (2014) Evaluation of the Agronomic Performances of Cowpea Varieties [Vigna unguiculata (L) Walp] in the Sahelian Zone of Chad. Revue Scientifique du Tchad, 1, 58-63.
[3] MAAH (2022) Statistical Dashboard of Rural Agriculture 2021-2022. 96 p.
[4] Ouédraogo, A.P., Sou, S., Sanon, A., Monge, J.P., Huignard, J., Tran, M.D. and Credland, P.F. (1996) Influence of Temperature and Humidity on Populations of Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) and Its Parasitoid Dinarmus basalis (Pteromalidae) in Two Zones of Burkina Faso. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 86, 695-702.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485300039213
[5] El-Rodeny, W.M., Salem, A.A., Mostafa, S.M. and Mohamed, A.M. (2018) Comparative Resistance as Function of Physical and Chemical Properties of Selected Faba Bean Promising Lines against Callosobruchus maculatus Post-Harvest. Journal of Plant Production, 9, 609-617.
https://doi.org/10.21608/jpp.2018.36367
[6] Juc, L. (2008) Study of the Risks Linked to the Use of Organochlorine Pesticides and Their Impact on the Environment and Human Health. PhD Thesis, Université Claude Bernard-Lyon I, Lyon, 185 p.
[7] Ojo, D.O. and Ogunleye, R.F. (2013) Comparative Effectiveness of the Powders of Some Underutilized Botanicals for the Control of Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, 120, 227-232.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03356479
[8] Ojo, D.O., Omotoso, O.T. and Obembe, O.M. (2018) Effectiveness of the Powders of Securidaca longepenculata (Fres.) as Bioinsecticides against Cowpea Beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus (Fab.) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). International Journal of Horticulture, 8, 1-7.
https://doi.org/10.5376/ijh.2018.08.0001
[9] Van Huis, A. (1991) Biological Methods of Bruchid Control in the Tropics: A Review. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, 12, 87-102.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742758400020579
[10] Castro, M.J.P., Baldin, E.L.L., Cruz, P.L., Souza, C.M.D. and Silva, P.H.S.D. (2013) Characterization of Cowpea Genotype Resistance to Callosobruchus maculatus. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 48, 1201-1209.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2013000900003
[11] Glitho, I.A. (2011) Study of the Reproductive Activity of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) on Ten Varieties of Cowpea, Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. in the Presence or Absence of Its Parasitoid, Dinarmus basalis R. (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 11, 1398-1408.
[12] Ciulei, I. (1982) Methodology for Analysis of Vegetable Drugs. Practical Manuals on Industrial Utilization of Medicinal and Aromatic Plantes. Ministry of Chemicals Industry, Bucharest, 73 p.
[13] Ngom, S., Faye, F.D., Diop, M., Kornprobst, J.M. and Samb, A. (2012) Chemical Composition and Physicochemical Properties of the Essential Oils of Ocimum basilicum and Hyptis suaveolens (L.) Poit. Harvested in the Dakar Region of Senegal. Bulletin of the Royal Society of Sciences of Liège, 81, 166-175.
[14] Soumahoro, B., Soro, Y., Benjamin Kassi, A.B. and Siaka, S. (2020) Comparative Study of the Phytochemical Characteristics of Hyptis suaveolens Leaves before and after Extraction of the Essential Oil. Journal of the West African Society of Chemistry, No. 49, 1-8.
[15] Adeoye, A.A., Ojo, J.A. and Ajao, A.M. (2021) Extracts from Hyptis suaveolens (L.) Poit. and Tephrosia vogelii Hook. f Leaves as Maize Grain Protectants against Larger Grain Borer. African Journal of Agriculture and Allied Sciences, 1, 197-215.
[16] Olounladé, P.A., Azando, E.V.B., Hounzangbé-Adoté, M.S., Ha, T.T., Leroy, E., Moulis, C. and Valentin, A. (2012) In Vitro Anthelmintic Activity of the Essential Oils of Zanthoxylum zanthoxyloides and Newbouldia laevis against Strongyloides ratti. Parasitology Research, 110, 1427-1433.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-011-2645-4
[17] Elujoba, A.A. and Nagels, L. (1985) Chromatographic Isolation and Estimation of Zanthoxylol: An Antisickling Agent from the Roots of Zanthoxylum Species. Journal of Pharmaceutical & Biomedical Analysis, 3, 447-451.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0731-7085(85)80059-5
[18] Patiño, L.O.J., Prieto, R.J.A. and Cuca, S.L.E. (2012) Zanthoxylum Genus as Potential Source of Bioactive Compounds. Bioactive Compounds in Phytomedicine, 10, 184-218.
[19] Aruda, M.S.P., Fernandes, J.B., Vieira, P.C., Das, G.F., da Silva, F.M. and Prani, J.R. (1994) Protolimonoid and Lignans from Zanthoxylum petiolare. Phytochemistry, 36, 1303-1306.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(00)89656-9
[20] Buxton, T., Takahashi, S., Takakura, M., Niwata, I., Owusu, E.O. and Kim, C. (2017) Insecticidal Activities of Pellitorine Isolated from Zanthoxylum zanthoxyloides Roots against Sitophilus oryzae L. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies, 5, 163-168.
[21] Zhang, W., Zhang, Z., Chen, Z., Liang, J., Geng, Z., Guo, S., Du, S. and Deng, Z. (2017) Chemical Composition of Essential Oils from Six Zanthoxylum Species and Their Repellent Activities against Two Stored-Product Insects. Journal of Chemistry, 2017, Article ID: 1287362.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1287362
[22] Gbate, M., Ashamo, O.M. and Kayode, A.L. (2021) Biopesticidal Effect of Partitioned Extracts of Zanthoxylum zanthoxyloides (Lam.) Zepernick & Timler on Callosobruchus maculatus (Fab.). Journal of Agricultural Studies, 9, 215-227.
https://doi.org/10.5296/jas.v9i3.18867
[23] Barakat, D.A. (2011) Insecticidal and Antifeedant Activities and Chemical Composition of Casimiroa edulis La lave Lex (Rutaceae) Leaf Extract and Its Fractions against Spodoptera littoralis Larvae. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5, 693-703.
[24] Tran, H.T., Luong, M.N.T. and Tran, H.T. (2019) Antifeedant and Larvicidal Activities of Leaf Essential Oils from Hyptis suaveolens (L.) Poit., Chromolaena odorata (L.) RM King and Lantana camara L. against Spodoptera litura Fab. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). VNUHCM Journal of Natural Sciences, 3, 244-251.
https://doi.org/10.32508/stdjns.v3i4.685
[25] Abdoul Habou, Z., Haougui, A., Basso, A., Toudou, A., Haubruge, E. and Verheggen, F. (2014) Insecticidal Effect of Jatropha curcas L. Seed Oil on Callosobruchus maculatus Fab and Bruchidius atrolineatus Pic (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) on Stored Cowpea Seeds (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) in Niger. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 9, 2506-2510.
https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2013.7578
[26] Edwin, I.E. and Jacob, I.E. (2017) Bioinsecticidal Potency of Five Plant Extracts against Cowpea Weevil, Callosobruchus maculatus (F.), on Stored Cowpea, Vigna unguiculata (L). Jordan Journal of Biological Sciences, 10, 317-322.
[27] Kellouche, A. and Soltani, N. (2004) Biological Activity of Powders of Five Plants and the Essential Oil of One of Them on Callosobruchus maculatus (F.). International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, 24, 184-191.
https://doi.org/10.1079/IJT200420
[28] Toudert-Taleb, K., Hedjal-Chebheb, M., Hami, H., Kellouche, A. and Debras, J.F. (2014) Composition of Essential Oils Extracted from Six Aromatic Plants of Kabylian Origin (Algeria) and Evaluation of Their Bioactivity on Callosobruchus maculatus (Fabricius, 1775) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). African Entomology, 22, 417-427.
https://doi.org/10.4001/003.022.0220
[29] Azeez, O.M. and Pitan, O.O.R. (2015) Influence of Cowpea Variety on the Potency and Deterrent Indices of Six Plant Powders against the Seed Bruchid, Callosobruchus maculatus (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection, 48, 441-451.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03235408.2014.893637

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.