Relevance and Compliance of Requests for Dental Panoramic Radiography Examination at Yaounde (Cameroon) ()
1. Introduction
Every request made for radiological examination must respond to a given number of known administrative and clinical criteria [1] [2]. In our environment, the request for orthopantomogram (OPT) examination is increasing. This less radiating examination is highly demanded for his numerous indications both diagnostic and prognostic. So, it will be wise to take into consideration all elements that could contribute to the optimisation of this examination, minimization of expenses, errors diagnosis, therapeutic wandering and useless examinations.
The optimisation of this examination will go through a request respecting the criteria relating to radiology examinations.
The French National Authority for Health (HAS) as well as other enterprises and schools advocate certain recommendations for a well-written request for imaging examination. These recommendations set the criteria to follow during the prescriptions of requests. These include eight criteria, five of which are of administrative order (date of the request, requesting agency, patient’s identity, patient’s age, applicant’s identity) and three of clinical order (anatomic region, reason for the examination and the purpose of the examination).
The purpose or the question asked by the clinician enables the radiologist to know what he is searching for and to give him an answer acting as an orientation or a confirmation [3].
Research studies made in Cameroon on compliance and relevance in the various areas of imaging, show the failure to comply with administrative and clinical criteria. These research studies led to recommendations meant for result amelioration. However, the orthopantomogram (OPT) field remains less studied in that regard [4] [5].
This situation brings us to question ourselves about the compliance and the relevance of requests for panoramic dental radiography examinations.
2. Methods
2.1. Type of Study
We conducted a descriptive cross-sectional study aimed at evaluating the compliance and the relevance of requests for panoramic dental radiography examination. The research study was carried out in four medical imaging centres of Yaounde from January to March 2018.
2.2. Procedure
We proceeded to a comprehensive consecutive sampling of OPT requests collected during the study period. Data was collected on a technical form, both anonymous and individual, prepared in advance. All collected requests were taken into consideration and examination reports were consulted in the data base of the various centres. Variables studied were the validity criteria of requests for imaging examination. This includes eight criteria, five of which are of administrative order (date of the request, requesting department, patient’s identity, patient’s age, applicant’s identity) and three of clinical order (anatomic region, reason for the examination and the purpose of the examination).
2.3. Statistical Analysis
Percentage comparison was made with the help of Chi-2 with a trusted interval of 95%.
3. Results
3.1. Overall Criteria Compliance
Generally, we observed that out of the 179 collected requests, administrative criteria contained more information than clinical criteria (Table 1).
Patient’s identity (name) was the criteria carrying the highest information (98.9%), followed by the name of the applicant physician (91.6%). The requesting department was the criteria carrying the less information (46.9%). Patient’s age gave information on 48.7% of requests. The reason for the examination and the anatomical region were respectively present on 52.5% and 50.8% of requests.
3.2. Overall Compliance of Request
Table 2 shows the compliance of request. 15 requests, that is 8.4%, had complete information. 69.8% of requests were made up of at least 5 of the 8 criteria.
![]()
Table 1. Summary of the various criteria compliance.
![]()
Table 2. Compliance rate of requests.
3.3. Qualifications of Prescribers
Dental surgeons were the top prescribers with a total of 112 (62.6%), other physicians came in second position with a total of 36 (20.1%). This included maxillofacial, ENT surgeons and general practitioners with 8.4%, 5.6% and 3.4% respectively. We observed a non-precision qualification rate of 25 (14.5%) prescribers. Figure 1 presents the number of prescribers according to their qualification.
3.4. Indications (Clinical Diagnosis)
In our research study, 46.4% of requests had no indications. Facial trauma constituted the most represented indication accounting for 15.6% of the whole requests (Table 3).
4. Discussion
The aim of our research study was to analyse the requests for panoramic dental radiography examination in the town of Yaounde. The objective was to determine the compliance and relevance of these requests in relation to the French High Authority of Health (HAS). We analysed 179 collected requests in three months, in 4 centres having dental panoramic service.
4.1. Quality of the Prescriber
As for the examination prescription, we observed that dental surgeons were the first prescribers. This tendency could be explained by the fact that majority of panoramic indications are of the dental surgeons field. He is the specialist mostly familiar with the pathology related to the major indications of dental panoramic radiography.
![]()
Figure 1. Frequency of prescribers according to their qualifications.
![]()
Table 3. Clinical diagnosis found in requests.
4.2. Quality (Compliance Criteria) of the Requests
In our research study, fifteen requests were 100% compliant. This rate is superior to the one obtained by Moifo and al [4] who found 1.1% compliance on a sample of 262 collected requests within two months.
4.2.1. Prescription Date of Requests
On about 87.7% of OPT examinations requests were found prescription date. The prescription date is essential because from it, the validity period of the request can be approximated. These results are close to those of HAS and Moifo and al which were of 90% and 92% respectively [1] [4]. Togola, at Bamako in 2014 during a thesis on “compliance indicators for imaging examination requests in radiology and nuclear medicine department of Chu point G”, found that 99% of requests were compliant so far as the date of prescription is concerned [6].
4.2.2. Identity of the Patient
Our results are similar to those of Togola, Moifo and Irurhe [4] [6] [7] in sub-Saharan Africa. These results may be explained by the fact that patient’s identification is filled first in examination requests.
4.2.3. Patient’s Age and Sex
The age and sex of the patient were absent on the examination requests in 50.3% and 15.6% of cases. The absence of these information may disturb while interpreting because there exist variations and injuries depending on age and sex. As for age, our results were inferior to those of Gbazi at Cocody in 2006, who obtained 84.60% [8]. Concerning sex, our results were superior to those of Gbazy who found that on 32% of requests sex carried no information. This tendency could be explained by the fact that most of the prescribers were dental-surgeon and they found it redundant repeating these indications.
4.2.4. Requesting Department
The requesting department was not mentioned in 53.1% of requests. Our results were closed to those of Moifo and al [5] who obtained 63% of requests with the requesting department absent. However, they were superior to those of Gbazy [8] who found 34.45%, but still much more inferior to HAS [1]. This could be explained by the fact that some requests came from private dental clinics considered as precise departments.
4.2.5. Qualification of the Prescriber’s Department
As for the prescriber’s qualification, our result is superior to that of Moifo and al [4] who obtained an attendance rate of 77.1%. The origin of this difference results from the awareness in previous works.
4.2.6. Anatomical Region of the Supposed Injury Acknowledgements
Our result is inferior to that of HAS [1] and K. Togola who obtained 98% and 99.5% respectively. Some prescribers consider dental panoramic as a precise examination centred on one region. Thus, dental panoramic permits the study of four different regions of which the accuracy will enable the radiologist readjust the device’s parameters and to concentrate his research on a specific area during the examination.
4.2.7. Reason for the Examination
Our result is close to that of Moifo and al in Cameroon [4] [5] who found that 40.1% lacked clinical information. It is inferior to that of Gbazy [8], who found that 5.7% of requests did not have a reason. The reason for the examination is the first important thing. This is because it justifies the examination and the technique to be used. So, the quality of the interpretation depends on these elements.
4.2.8. Purpose for the Examination
The percentage aim present on requests of our research study is superior to that of Gbazy [8] who found 16.8%, and it is inferior to that of Moifo who found 76.3% of requests with final application [5]. This rate trends to suggest that, imaging examinations are not meant to confirm hypothesis but to orient it towards a diagnosis.
4.3. Analysis Based on the Prescriber’s Qualification
Compliance analysis based on the prescriber’s qualification show that dental-surgeons were the first prescribers (62.2%). However the compliance rate of the various clinic criteria was not satisfying for them. None of the clinical criteria could carry up to 50% information. This result could be drawn from the fact that most dental surgeons interpret themselves their shots and therefore would not see the need to give these information to radiologists.
5. Conclusion
Further to this study of which the general objective was to evaluate the compliance and relevance of requests for dental panoramic radiography in Yaoundé, we conclude that the quality of dental panoramic requests was not optimal in Yaounde.