A Comment on Reis

HTML  Download Download as PDF (Size: 72KB)  PP. 91-94  
DOI: 10.4236/tel.2011.13019    5,681 Downloads   9,872 Views  
Author(s)

Affiliation(s)

.

ABSTRACT

This note gives a counterexample on Reis [1]. Using a certain family of utility functions, this note not only gives a sharper representation than that of Reis but also demonstrates that interest rate inelastic money demand does not lead to superneutrality. This implies that superneutrality does not exist when uncerinty is introduced.

Share and Cite:

K. Miyazaki, "A Comment on Reis," Theoretical Economics Letters, Vol. 1 No. 3, 2011, pp. 91-94. doi: 10.4236/tel.2011.13019.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.