Share This Article:

Individual Leaf Area of Early Flowering Arabidopsis Genotypes Is More Affected by Drought than Late Flowering Ones: A Multi-Scale Analysis in 35 Genetically Modified Lines

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:845KB) PP. 955-971
DOI: 10.4236/ajps.2015.67102    3,170 Downloads   3,659 Views   Citations


Plants acclimate to drought optimizing the trade-off between biomass production and water loss while ensuring their survival and reproduction. Plants also modify their growth or phenology as complementary strategies in response to stress. Despite evidence of an interaction between flowering time and plant growth response to environmental stresses, this interaction in response to drought is under debate. To contribute to the analysis of this interaction, leaf growth of 35 genetically modified lines of Arabidopsis thaliana and their common wild-type, Col-0 was analyzed by a quantitative multi-scale phenotyping approach from cellular to whole plant scale both in well-watered and soil moderate water deficit conditions. These genotypes were selected for the various physiological functions potentially altered by their genetic modification and that could interact with plant growth and/or their drought responses. In all genotypes, leaf expansion decreased in response to drought both at the whole rosette and the individual leaf levels. Additionally, epidermal cell area and/or epidermal cell number decreased in response to the drought treatment. In contrast, the number of rosette leaves was reduced in only half of the genotypes and leaf growth duration was only modified in 4 of them. Despite long photoperiod conditions, the duration of the vegetative phase, i.e. the time elapsed between germination and flowering stage, varied from 12 to 27 days among genotypes under well watered conditions. Our analyses revealed that the differences of flowering time observed in well-watered condition impacted the leaf area response to drought. Early-flowering genotypes slightly decreased their final leaf number, but strongly reduced their individual leaf area compared with the late-flowering ones. This result underlines the difficulty to analyze plant response to environmental stresses when genotypes with different flowering dates are compared.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Massonnet, C. , Dauzat, M. , Bédiée, A. , Vile, D. and Granier, C. (2015) Individual Leaf Area of Early Flowering Arabidopsis Genotypes Is More Affected by Drought than Late Flowering Ones: A Multi-Scale Analysis in 35 Genetically Modified Lines. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 6, 955-971. doi: 10.4236/ajps.2015.67102.


[1] Bray, E.A. (1997) Plant Responses to Water Deficit. Trends in Plant Science, 2, 48-54.
[2] Skirycz, A. and Inze, D. (2010) More from Less: Plant Growth under Limited Water. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 21, 197-203.
[3] Tardieu, F., Granier, C. and Muller, B. (2011) Water Deficit and Growth. Co-Ordinating Processes without an Orchestrator? Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 14, 283-289.
[4] Grime, J. (1977) Evidence for Existence of Three Primary Strategies in Plants and Its Relevance to Ecological and Evolutionary Theory. American Naturalist, 111, 1169-1194.
[5] McKay, J.K., Richards, J.H. and Mitchell-Olds, T. (2003) Genetics of Drought Adaptation in Arabidopsis thaliana : I. Pleiotropy Contributes to Genetic Correlations among Ecological Traits. Molecular Ecology, 12, 1137-1151.
[6] Franck, N., Winkler, S., Pastenes, C. and Infante, R. (2007) Acclimation to Sun and Shade of Three Accessions of the Chilean Native Berry-Crop Murta. Agroforestry Systems, 69, 215-229.
[7] Verslues, P.E. and Juenger, T.E. (2011) Drought, Metabolites, and Arabidopsis Natural Variation: A Promising Combination for Understanding Adaptation to Water-Limited Environments. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 14, 240-245.
[8] Baerenfaller, K., Massonnet, C., Walsh, S., Baginsky, S., Buhlmann, P., Hennig, L., Hirsch-Hoffmann, M., Howell, KA., Kahlau, S., Radziejwoski, A., Russenberger, D., Rutishauser, D., Small, I., Stekhoven, D., Sulpice, R., Svozil, J., Wuyts, N., Stitt, M., Hilson, P., Granier, C. and Gruissem, W. (2012) Systems-Based Analysis of Arabidopsis Leaf Growth Reveals Adaptation to Water Deficit. Molecular Systems Biology, 8, 1-18.
[9] Aguirrezabal, L., Bouchier-Combaud, S., Radziejwoski, A., Dauzat, M., Cookson, S.J. and Granier, C. (2006) Plasticity to Soil Water Deficit in Arabidopsis thaliana: Dissection of Leaf Development into Underlying Growth Dynamic and Cellular Variables Reveals Invisible Phenotypes. Plant, Cell and Environment, 29, 2216-2227.
[10] Hummel, I., Pantin, F., Sulpice, R., Piques, M., Rolland, G., Dauzat, M., Christophe, A., Pervent., M., Bouteille, M., Stitt, M., Gibon, Y. and Muller, B. (2010) Arabidopsis Plants Acclimate to Water Deficit at Low Cost through Changes of Carbon Usage: An Integrated Perspective Using Growth, Metabolite, Enzyme, and Gene Expression Analysis. Plant Physiology, 154, 357-372.
[11] Bray, E.A. (2004) Genes Commonly Regulated by Water-Deficit Stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Journal of Experimental Botany, 55, 2331-2341.
[12] Claeys, H., De Bodt, S. and Inze, D. (2014) Gibberellins and DELLAs: Central Nodes in Growth Regulatory Networks. Trends in Plant Science, 19, 231-239.
[13] Granier, C., Aguirrezabal, L., Chenu, K., Cookson, S.J., Dauzat, M., Hamard, P., Thioux, J.J., Rolland, G., Bouchier- Combaud, S., Lebaudy, A., Muller, B., Simonneau, T. and Tardieu, F. (2006) PHENOPSIS, an Automated Platform for Reproducible Phenotyping of Plant Responses to Soil Water Deficit in Arabidopsis thaliana Permitted the Identification of an Accession with Low Sensitivity to Soil Water Deficit. New Phytologist, 169, 623-635.
[14] Bouchabke-Coussa, O., Quashie, M.L., Seoane-Redondo, J., Fortabat, M.N., Gery, C., Yu, A., Linderme, D., Trouverie, J., Granier, F., Teoule, E. and Durand-Tardif, M. (2008) ESKIMO1 Is a Key Gene Involved in Water Economy as Well as Cold Acclimation and Salt Tolerance. BMC Plant Biology, 8, 125.
[15] Koorneef, M., Hanhart, C.J. and van der Veen, J.H. (1991) A Genetic and Physiological Analysis of Late Flowering Mutants in Arabidopsis thaliana. Molecular and General Genetics, 229, 57-66.
[16] Hausmann, N.J., Juenger, T.E., Sen, S., Stowe, K.A., Dawson, T.E. and Simms, A.L. (2005) Quantitative Trait Loci Affecting δ13C and Response to Differential Water Availability in Arabidopsis thaliana. Evolution, 59, 81-96.
[17] McKay, J.K., Richards, J.H. and Nemali, K.S. (2008) Genetics of Drought Adaptation in Arabidopsis thaliana. II. QTL Analysis of a New Mapping Population, KAS-1 × TSU-1. Evolution, 62, 3014-3026.
[18] Tisne, S., Schmalenbach, I., Reymond, M., Dauzat, M., Pervent, M., Vile, D. and Granier, C. (2010) Keep on Growing under Drought: Genetic and Developmental Bases of the Response of Rosette Area Using a Recombinant Inbred Line Population. Plant, Cell and Environment, 33, 1875-1887.
[19] Schmalenbach, I., Zhang, L., Reymond, M. and Jiménez-Gómez, J.M. (2014) The Relationship between Flowering Time and Growth Responses to Drought in the Arabidopsis Landsberg erecta x Antwerp-1 Population. Frontiers in Plant Science, 5, 609.
[20] Cookson, S.J., Chenu, K. and Granier, C. (2007) Day-Length Affects the Dynamics of Leaf Expansion and Cellular Development in Arabidopsis thaliana Partially through Floral Transition Timing. Annals of Botany, 99, 703-711.
[21] Alonso-Blanco, C., El-Assal, S.E.D., Coupland, G. and Koornneef, M. (1998) Analysis of Natural Allelic Variation at Flowering Time Loci in the Landsberg erecta and Cap Verde Islands Ecotypes of Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics, 149, 749-764.
[22] Juenger, T.E., McKay, J.K., Hausmann, N., Keurentjes, J.J.B., Saunak, S., Stowe, K.A., Dawson, T.E., Simms, E.L. and Richards, J.H. (2005) Identification and Characterization of QTL Underlying Whole-Plant Physiology in Arabidopsis thaliana: δ13C, Stomatal Conductance and Transpiration Efficiency. Plant, Cell and Environment, 28, 697-708.
[23] El-Lithy, M.E., Bentsink, L., Hanhart, C.J., Ruys, G.J., Rovito, D., Broekhof, J.L.M., van der Poel, H.J.A., van Eijk, M.T.J., Vreugdenhil, D. and Koornneef, M. (2006) New Arabidopsis Recombinant Inbred Line Populations Genotyped Using SNPWave and Their Use for Mapping Flowering-Time Quantitative Trait Loci. Genetics, 172, 1867-1876.
[24] Lovell, J.T., Juenger, T.E., Michaels, S.D., Lasky, J.R., Platt, A., Richards, J.H., Yu, X., Easlon, H.M., Sen, S. and McKay, J.K. (2013) Pleiotropy of FRIGIDA Enhances the Potential for Multivariate Adaptation. Proceedings of Royal Society B, 280, Article ID: 20131043.
[25] Shindo, C., Aranzana, M.J., Lister, C., Baxter, C., Nicholls, C., Nordborg, M. and Dean, C. (2005) Role of FRIGIDA and FLOWERING LOCUS C in Determining Variation in Flowering Time of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology, 138, 1163-1173.
[26] Fabre, J., Dauzat, M., Nègre, V., Wuyts, N., Tireau, A., Gennari, E., Neveu, P., Tisné, S., Massonnet, C., Hummel, I. and Granier, C. (2011) PHENOPSIS DB: An Information System for Arabidopsis thaliana Phenotypic Data in an Environmental Context. BMC Plant Biology, 11, 77.
[27] Boyes, D.C., Zayed, M.A., Ascenzi, R., McCaskill, A.J., Hoffman, N.E., Davis, K.R. and Görlach, J. (2001) Growth Stage-Based Phenotypic Analysis of Arabidopsis a Model for High Throughput Functional Genomics in Plants. Plant Cell, 13, 1499-1510.
[28] R Development Core Team (2007) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
[29] Dudley, S.A. (1996) Differing Selection on Plant Physiological Traits in Response to Environmental Water Availability: A Test of Adaptive Hypotheses. Evolution, 50, 92-102.
[30] Singh, K.B., Foley, R.C. and Onate-Sanchez, L. (2002) Transcription Factors in Plant Defense and Stress Responses. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 5, 430-436.
[31] Pantin, F., Simonneau, T., Rolland, G., Dauzat, M. and Muller, B. (2011) Control of Leaf Expansion: A Developmental Switch from Metabolics to Hydraulics. Plant Physiology, 156, 803-815.
[32] Pantin, F., Fanciullino, A.L., Massonnet, C., Dauzat, M., Simonneau, T. and Muller, B. (2014) Buffering Growth Variations against Water Deficits through Timely Carbon Usage. Frontiers in Plant Science, 4, 483.
[33] Sanchez, A., Shin, J. and Davis, S.J. (2011) Plant Signaling and Behavior, 6, 223-231.
[34] Shinozaki, K. and Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. (2007) Gene Networks Involved in Drought Stress Response and Tolerance. Journal of Experimental Botany, 58, 221-227.
[35] Koornneef, M., Alonso-Blanco, C. and Vreugdenhil, D. (2004) Naturally Occurring Genetic Variation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 55, 141-172.
[36] Wuyts, N., Massonnet, C., Dauzat, M. and Granier, C. (2012) Structural Assessment of the Impact of Environmental Constraints on Arabidopsis thaliana Leaf Growth: A 3D Approach. Plant Cell and Environment, 35, 1631-1646.
[37] Yegappan, T.M., Paton, D.M., Gates, C.T. and Muller, W.J. (1980) Water Stress in Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). I. Effect on Plant Development. Annals of Botany, 46, 61-70.
[38] Yegappan, T.M., Paton, D.M., Gates, C.T. and Muller, W.J. (1982) Water Stress in Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). II. Effects on Leaf Cells and Leaf Area. Annals of Botany, 49, 63-68.
[39] Massonnet, C., Tisné, S., Radziejwoski, A., Vile, D., De Veylder, L., Dauzat, M. and Granier, C. (2011) New Insights into the Control of Endoreduplication: Endoreduplication Could Be Driven by Organ Growth in Arabidopsis Leaves. Plant Physiology, 157, 2044-2055.
[40] Dorn, L.A., Pyle, E.H. and Schmitt, J. (2000) Plasticity to Light Cues and Resources in Arabidopsis thaliana: Testing for Adaptive Value and Costs. Evolution, 54, 1982-1994.
[41] Nord, E.A. and Lynch, J.P. (2008) Delayed Reproduction in Arabidopsis thaliana Improves Fitness in Soil with Suboptimal Phosphorus Availability. Plant, Cell and Environment, 31, 1432-1441.
[42] Comont, D., Winters, A. and Gwynn-Jones, D. (2012) Acclimation and Interaction between Drought and Elevated UV-B in A. thaliana: Differences in Response over Treatment, Recovery and Reproduction. Ecology and Evolution, 2, 2695-2709.
[43] Bresson, J., Varoquaux, F., Bontpart, T., Touraine, B. and Vile, D. (2013) The PGPR Strain Phyllobacterium brassicacearum STM196 Induces a Reproductive Delay and Physiological Changes That Result in Improved Drought Tolerance in Arabidopsis. New Phytologist, 200, 558-569.
[44] Vile, D., Pervent, M., Belluau, M., Vasseur, F., Bresson, J., Muller, B., Granier, C. and Simonneau, T. (2012) Arabidopsis Growth under Prolonged High Temperature and Water Deficit: Independent or Interactive Effects? Plant, Cell and Environment, 35, 702-718.
[45] He, W.M., Thelen, G.C., Ridenour, W.M. and Callaway, R.M. (2010) Is There a Risk to Living Large? Large Size Correlates with Reduced Growth When Stressed for Knapweed Populations. Biological Invasions, 12, 3591-3598.
[46] Wolfe, M.D. and Tonsor, S.J. (2014) Adaptation to Spring Heat and Drought in Northeastern Spanish Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytologist, 201, 323-334.
[47] Earley, E.J., Ingland, B., Winkler, J. and Tonsor, S.J. (2009) Inflorescences Contribute More than Rosettes to Lifetime Carbon Gain in Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae). American Journal of Botany, 96, 786-792.
[48] Dittmar, E.L., Oakley, C.G., Agren, J. and Schemske, D.W. (2014) Flowering Time QTL in Natural Populations of Arabidopsis thaliana and Implications for Their Adaptive Value. Molecular Evolution, 23, 4291-4303.
[49] Wu, C.A., Lowry, D.B., Nutter, L.I. and Willis, J.H. (2010) Natural Variation for Drought-Response Traits in the Mimulus guttatus Species Complex. Oecologia, 162, 23-33.
[50] Fulton, D.C., Stettler, M., Mettler, T., Vaughan, C.K., Li, J., Francisco, P., Gil, M., Reinhold, H., Eicke, S., Messerli, G., Dorken, G., Halliday, K., Smith, A.M., Smith, S.M. and Zeeman, S.C. (2008) β-AMYLASE4, a Noncatalytic Protein Required for Starch Breakdown, Acts Upstream of Three Active β-Amylases in Arabidopsis Chloroplasts. Plant Cell, 20, 1040-1058.
[51] Chia, T., Thorneycroft, D., Chapple, A., Messerli, G., Chen, J., Zeeman, S.C., Smith, S.M. and Smith, A.M. (2004) A Cytosolic Glucosyltransferase Is Required for Conversion of Starch to Sucrose in Arabidopsis Leaves at Night. The Plant Journal, 37, 853-863.
[52] Niittylä, T., Messerli, G., Trevisan, M., Chen, J., Smith, A.M. and Zeeman, S.C. (2004) A Previously Unknown Maltose Transporter Essential for Starch Degradation in Leaves. Science, 303, 87-89.
[53] Yu, T.S., Kofler, H., Hausler, R.E., Hille, D., Flugge, U.I., Zeeman, S.C., Smith, A.M., Kossmann, J., Lloyd, J. and Ritte, G. (2001) The Arabidopsis Sex1 Mutant Is Defective in the R1 Protein, a General Regulator of Starch Degradation in Plants, and Not in the Chloroplast Hexose Transporter. Plant Cell, 13, 1907-1918.
[54] Caspar, T., Huber, S.C. and Somerville, C. (1985) Alterations in Growth, Photosynthesis, and Respiration in a Starchless Mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Deficient in Chloroplast Phosphoglucomutase Activity. Plant Physiology, 79, 11-17.
[55] Schneider, A., Häusler, R.E., Kolukisaoglu, U., Kunze, R., van der Graaff, E., Schwacke, R., Catoni, E., Desimone, M. and Flügge, U.I. (2002) An Arabidopsis thaliana Knock-Out Mutant of the Chloroplast Triose Phosphate/Phosphate Translocator Is Severely Compromised Only When Starch Synthesis, but Not Starch Mobilisation Is Abolished. Plant Journal, 32, 685-699.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.