Share This Article:

Hydrodynamic Performance Analysis of the Ducted Propeller Based on the Combination of Multi-Block Hybrid Mesh and Reynolds Stress Model

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:1072KB) PP. 67-74
DOI: 10.4236/jfcmv.2015.32007    3,277 Downloads   3,686 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

In order to analyze the hydrodynamic performance of the ducted propeller with high precision, this paper proposes a new method which combines Multi-Block Hybrid Mesh and Reynolds Stress Model (MBHM & RSM). The calculation errors of MBHM & RSM and standard two-equation model (standard k-ε model) on the ducted propeller JD7704 +Ka4-55 are compared. The maximum error of the total thrust coefficient KT, the duct thrust coefficient KTN, the torque coefficient KQ and the open-water efficiency η0 of MBHM & RSM are 2.98%, 4.01%, 1.46%, and 0.89%, respectively, which are lower than those of standard k-ε model. Indeed, the pressure distribution on the propeller surfaces, the pressure and the velocity vector distribution of the flow field are also analyzed, which are consistent with the theory. It is demonstrated that MBHM & RSM on the thruster dynamics analysis are feasible. This paper provides reference in the thruster designing of underwater robot.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

He, X. , Zhao, H. , Chen, X. , Luo, Z. and Miao, Y. (2015) Hydrodynamic Performance Analysis of the Ducted Propeller Based on the Combination of Multi-Block Hybrid Mesh and Reynolds Stress Model. Journal of Flow Control, Measurement & Visualization, 3, 67-74. doi: 10.4236/jfcmv.2015.32007.

References

[1] Baltazar, J., Falcão De Campos, J. and Bosschers, J. (2012) Open-Water Thrust and Torque Predictions of a Ducted Propeller System with a Panel Method. International Journal of Rotating Machinery, Article ID: 474785. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/474785
[2] Abdel-Maksoud, M., Steden, M. and Hundemer, J. (2010) Design of a Multi-Component Propulsor. Proceedings of 28th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Pasadena, 12-17 September 2010, 744-758.
[3] Yu, L., et al. (2013) Numerical Analysis of Ducted Propeller Performance under Open Water Test Condition. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 18, 381-394. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00773-013-0215-4
[4] Haimov, H., et al. (2010) Ducted Propellers. A Solution for Better Propulsion of Ships Calculations and Practice. Proceedings of 1st International Symposium on Fishing Vessel Energy Efficiency E-Fishing, Vigo, 265-271.
[5] Peng, H.H., Qiu, W. and Ni, S. (2013) Effect of Turbulence Models on RANS Computation of Propeller Vortex Flow. Ocean Engineering, 72, 304-317. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.07.009
[6] Pan, X., Zhang, J.-Y. and Liu, C.-J. (2011) Numerical Simulation and Analysis of Cavitation Characteristics of Ship Propeller. Intelligence Information Processing and Trusted Computing (IPTC), Wuhan, 22-23 October 2011, 180-183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IPTC.2011.53
[7] Choong, W.H., et al. (2013) Outboard Marine Propeller Performance Analysis through CFD Modelling. Computer Modelling and Simulation (UKSim), Cambridge, 10-12 April 2013, 310-323.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.