Disruptive Technology as Antecedent to  CEO Pay-Performance Sensitivity

Rebecca Abraham; Judith Harris; Joel Auerbach

doi:10.4236/ti.2015.62009

Home > Journals > Business & Economics > TI

Technology and Investment > Vol.6 No.2, May 2015

Disruptive Technology as Antecedent to CEO Pay-Performance Sensitivity ()

Rebecca Abraham, Judith Harris, Joel Auerbach

Huizenga School of Business, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, USA.

DOI: 10.4236/ti.2015.62009 PDF HTML XML 4,365 Downloads 4,917 Views Citations

Abstract

This study examines the influence of disruptive technology on firm performance, which in turn explains CEO compensation. Innovation consists of a series of S-curves which progress from introduction to growth, maturity and decline until they are replaced by new technology which has its own S curve. Each S curve involves the introduction of products that are cheaper, simpler, smaller and more convenient than established technology by catering to specific market needs currently unserved by existing technology. Disruptive technology is a special case of innovation characterized by its ability to displace a mainstream competitor, while innovation displaces ex- isting technology. This study follows on earlier empirical research that observed that a sample of technology-intensive US firms listed on the NASDAQ from 1993-2012 rewarded CEOs for engaging in disruptive technology by increasing their compensation in the form of stock option grants, suggesting that the effective implementation of disruptive technology results in superior firm performance which is rewarded with incentive pay such as stock option grants. We provide empirical support for the thesis that the implementation of disruptive technology increases net income and subsequently increases incentive pay. Such positive effects of disruptive technology on net income are strengthened for CEOs of higher age, longer tenure, more education and if the CEO is a founder or a celebrity and for larger firms. We draw on the literature on the influence of demographic characteristics on the implantation of innovation to explain the positive interaction of disruptive technology with demographic characteristics which in turn, improve corporate financial performance and consequently increase CEO incentive compensation.

Keywords

CEO Pay-Performance Sensitivity, Disruptive Technology, Age, Tenure, Education, Founder

Share and Cite:

Abraham, R. , Harris, J. and Auerbach, J. (2015) Disruptive Technology as Antecedent to CEO Pay-Performance Sensitivity. Technology and Investment, 6, 83-92. doi: 10.4236/ti.2015.62009.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Schumpeter, J.A. (1939) Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. McGraw-Hill, New York.
[2]	Johnson, M., Christensen, C. and Hagermann, K. (2008) Reinventing Your Business Model. Harvard Business Review, 86, 2-11.
[3]	Abraham, R., Harris, J. and Auerbach, J. (2014) CEO Pay-Performance Sensitivity: A Multi-Equation Model. Technology and Investment, 5, 125-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ti.2014.53013
[4]	Tellis, G. (2006) Disruptive Technology or Visionary Leadership. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23, 34-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2005.00179.x
[5]	Kostiuk, P. (1990) Firm Size and Executive Compensation. Journal of Human Resources, 25, 90-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/145728
[6]	Murphy, K.J. (1999) Executive Compensation. In: Ashenfelter, O. and Card, D., Eds., Handbook of Labor Economics, North Holland, Amsterdam, 2485-2563. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1573-4463(99)30024-9
[7]	Rosen, S. (1982) Authority, Control and the Distribution of Earnings. Bell Journal of Economics, 13, 311-323. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3003456
[8]	Davis, J.H., Schoorman, D. and Donaldson, L. (1997) Toward a Stewardship Theory of Management. The Academy of Management Review, 22, 20-47.
[9]	Donaldson, L. and Davis, J.H. (1989) CEO Governance and Shareholder Returns: Agency Theory or Stewardship Theory. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management.
[10]	Chandy, R.K. and Tellis, G.J. (1998) Organizing for Radical Product Innovation: The Overlooked Role of Willingness to Cannibalize. Journal of Marketing Research, 35, 474-487. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3152166
[11]	O’Reilly, C. and Chatman, J. (1986) Organizational Commitment and Psychological Attachment: The Effects of Compliance, Identification and Internalization on Prosocial Behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 492-499. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.492
[12]	Galbraith, J.K. (1952) American Capitalism: The Concept of Countervailing Power. Houghton Mifflin, New York.
[13]	Ali, A. (1994) Pioneering versus Incremental Innovation: Review and Research Propositions. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11, 46-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0737-6782(94)90118-X
[14]	Tosi, H., Werner, S., Katz, J. and Gomez-Mejia, L. (2000) How Much Does Performance Matter? A Meta-Analysis of CEO Pay Studies. Journal of Management, 26, 301-339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600207
[15]	Anderson, M.C., Banker, R.D. and Ravindran, S. (2000) Executive Compensation in the Information Technology Industry. Management Science, 46, 530-547. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.4.530.12055
[16]	Shin, E., Lee, J. and Kajoo, I. (2009) CEO Compensation and US High-Tech and Low-Tech Firms’ Corporate Performance. Contemporary Management Research, 5, 93-106.
[17]	Brookman, J.T. and Thistle, P.D. (2013) Managerial Compensation: Luck, Skill or Labor Markets? Journal of Corporate Finance, 21, 252-268.
[18]	Lin, D., Kuo, H. and Wang, L.H. (2013) Chief Executive Compensation: An Empirical Study of Fat Cat CEOs. The International Journal of Business and Finance Research, 7, 27-42.
[19]	Balkin, D.B., Markman, G.D. and Gomez-Mejia, L.R. (2000) Is CEO Pay in High-Technology Firms Related to Innovation? Academy of Management Journal, 43, 1118-1129. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1556340
[20]	Holmstrom, B. (1999) Managerial Incentive Problems: A Dynamic Perspective. The Review of Economic Studies, 66, 169-182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-937X.00083
[21]	Scharfstein, D.S. and Stein, J.C. (1990) Herd Behavior and Investment. The American Economic Review, 80, 465-479.
[22]	Finkelstein, S. and Hambrick, D.C. (1996) Top Executives and Their Efforts on Organizations. West Publishing, Minneapolis-St. Paul.
[23]	Smith, C.W. and Watts, R.L. (1982) Incentive and Tax Effects of Executive Compensation Plans. Australian Journal of Management, 7, 139-157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/031289628200700204
[24]	Gaver, J.J. and Gaver, K.M. (1993) Additional Evidence on the Association between the Investment Opportunity Set and Corporate Financing, Dividend, and Compensation Policies. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 16, 125-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(93)90007-3
[25]	Baber, W., Janakiraman, S. and King, S. (1996) Investment Opportunities and the Structure of Executive Compensation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 21, 297-318.
[26]	Guay, W.R. (1999) The Sensitivity of CEO Wealth to Equity Risk: An Analysis of the Magnitude and Determinants. Journal of Financial Economics, 53, 43-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(99)00016-1
[27]	Miller, D. and Shamsie, J. (2001) Learning across the Life Cycle: Experimentation and Performance among the Hollywood Studio Heads. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 725-745. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.171
[28]	Vintilla, G. and Ghergina, S.C. (2012) An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Corporate Governance Mechanisms, CEO Characteristics and Listed Companies’ Performance. International Business Research, 5, 175-191.
[29]	Becker, G. (1974) Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
[30]	Chung, K.H. and Pruitt, S.W. (1996) Executive Ownership, Corporate Value and Executive Compensation: A Unifying Framework. Journal of Banking and Finance, 20, 1135-1159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-4266(95)00039-9
[31]	Main, B.G.M., O’Reilly, C.A. and Wade, J.B. (1995) The CEO, the Board of Directors and Executive Compensation: Economic and Psychological Perspectives. Industrial and Corporate Change, 4, 293-332. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icc/4.2.293
[32]	Villalonga, B. and Amit, R. (2006) How Do Family Ownership, Management, and Control Affect Firm Value? Journal of Financial Economics, 80, 385-417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.12.005
[33]	Palia, D., Ravid, S.A. and Wang, C.J. (2008) Founder versus Non-Founder in Large Companies: Financial Incentives and the Call for Regulation. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 33, 55-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11149-007-9042-z
[34]	Adams, R., Almeida, H. and Ferreira, D. (2009) Understanding the Relationship between Founder-CEOs and Firm Performance. Journal of Empirical Finance, 16, 136-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2008.05.002
[35]	Fahlenbrach, R. (2009) Founder CEOs, Investment Decisions, and Stock Market Performance. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 44, 439-466. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022109009090139