Share This Article:

Discussing an Expected Utility and Weighted Entropy Framework

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:331KB) PP. 545-551
DOI: 10.4236/ns.2014.67054    4,661 Downloads   5,780 Views   Citations


In this paper, it is discussed a framework combining traditional expected utility and weighted entropy (EU-WE)—also named mean contributive value index—which may be conceived as a decision aiding procedure, or a heuristic device generating compositional scenarios, based on information theory concepts, namely weighted entropy. New proofs concerning the maximum value of the index and the evaluation of optimal proportions are outlined, with emphasis on the optimal value of the Lagrange multiplier and its meaning. The rationale is a procedure of maximizing the combined value of a system expressed as a mosaic, denoted by characteristic values of the states and their proportions. Other perspectives of application of this EU-WE framework are suggested.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Casquilho, J. (2014) Discussing an Expected Utility and Weighted Entropy Framework. Natural Science, 6, 545-551. doi: 10.4236/ns.2014.67054.


[1] Guiasu, R.C. and Guiasu, S. (2010) The Rich-Gini-Simpson Quadratic Index of Biodiversity. Natural Science, 2, 1130-1137.
[2] Guiasu, R.C. and Guiasu, S. (2011) The Weighted Quadratic Index of Biodiversity for Pairs of Species: A Generalization of Rao’s Index. Natural Science, 3, 795-801.
[3] Forman, R.T.T. (1995) Land Mosaics—The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[4] Rocchini, D. (2005) Resolution Problems in Calculating Landscape Metrics. Journal of Spatial Science, 50, 25-35.
[5] Uuemaa, E., Antrop, M., Roosaare, J., Marja, R. and Mander, U. (2009) Landscape Metrics and Indices: An Overview of Their Use in Landscape Research. Living Reviews in Landscape Research, 3, 1-28.
[6] Nagendra, H. (2002) Opposite Trends in Response for the Shannon and Simpson Indices of Landscape Diversity. Applied Geography, 22, 175-186.
[7] Bernardo, J.M. (1979) Expected Information as Expected Utility. The Annals of Statistics, 7, 686-690.
[8] Shannon, C.E. (1948) A Mathematical Theory of Communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379-423, 623-656.
[9] Hartley, R.V.L. (1928) Transmission of Information. Bell System Technical Journal, 7, 535-563.
[10] Jaynes, E.T. (1957) Information Theory and Statistical Mechanics. The Physical Review, 106, 620-630.
[11] Kornreich, P. (2008) Mathematical Models of Information and Stochastic Systems. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
[12] Klir, G.J. (2006) Uncertainty and Information: Foundations of Generalized Information Theory. John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey.
[13] Rènyi, A. (1961) On Measures of Entropy and Information. Proceedings of the 4th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, 547-561.
[14] Ricotta, C., Corona, P., Marchetti, M., Chirici, G. and Innamorati, S. (2003) LaDy: Software for Assessing Local Landscape Diversity Profiles of Raster Land Cover Maps Using Geographic Windows. Environmental Modelling & Software, 18, 373-378.
[15] Hill, M.O. (1973) Diversity and Evenness: A Unifying Notation and Its Consequences. Ecology, 54, 427-432.
[16] Bellis, M. and Guiasu, S. (1968) A Quantitative-Qualitative Measure of Information in Cybernetic Systems. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 14, 593-594.
[17] Guiasu, S. (1971) Weighted Entropy. Reports on Mathematical Physics, 2, 165-179.
[18] Guiasu, S. (1986) Grouping Data by Using the Weighted Entropy. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 15, 63-69.
[19] Aggarwal, N.L. and Picard, C.-F. (1978) Functional Equations and Information Measures with Preference. Kybernetika, 14, 174-181.
[20] Batty, M. (1986) Cost, Accessibility and Weighted Entropy. Geographical Analysis, 15, 256-267.
[21] Nawrocki, D.N. and Harding, W.H. (1986) State-Value Weighted Entropy as a Measure of Investment Risk. Applied Economics, 18, 411-419.
[22] Taneja, H.C. and Tuteja, R.K. (1986) Characterization of a Quantitative-Qualitative Measure of Inaccuracy. Kybernetika, 22, 393-402.
[23] Guiasu, R.C. and Guiasu, S. (2003) Conditional and Weighted Measures of Ecological Diversity. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 11, 283-300.
[24] Guiasu, R.C. and Guiasu, S. (2012) The Weighted Gini-Simpson Index: Revitalizing an Old Index of Biodiversity. International Journal of Ecology, 2012, Article ID: 478728.
[25] Casquilho, J., Neves, M. and Rego, F. (1997) Extensoes da Funcao de Shannon e Equilíbrio de Proporcoes-Uma Aplicacao ao Mosaico de Paisagem. Anais do Instituto Superior de Agronomia, 46, 77-99.
[26] Casquilho, J.A.P. (1999) Ecomosaico: índices para o Diagnóstico de Proporcoes de Composicao. Ph.D. Thesis, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa, Lisboa.
[27] Casquilho, J.P (2010) Landscape Mosaic Composition and Mean Contributive Value Index. Silva Lusitana, 18, 197203.
[28] Casquilho, J.A.P. (2012) Ecomosaico Florestal: Composicao, índices de Informacao e Abducao. Revista árvore, 36, 321-329.
[29] Stratton-Lake, P. (2004) Kant, Duty, and Moral Worth. Routledge, New York.
[30] Arrhenius, G. and Rabinowicz, W. (2005) Value and Unacceptable risk. Economics and Philosophy, 21, 177-197.
[31] Ricotta, C. (2002) Bridging the Gap between Ecological Diversity Indices and Measures of Biodiversity with Shannon’s Entropy: Comment to Izsák and Papp. Ecological Modelling, 152, 1-3.
[32] Allen, B., Kon, M. and Bar-Yam, Y. (2009) A New Phylogenetic Diversity Measure Generalizing the Shannon Index and Its Application to Phyllostomid Bats. The American Naturalist, 174, 236-243.
[33] Yang, J. and Qiu, W. (2005) A Measure of Risk and a Decision-Making Model Based on Expected Utility and Entropy. European Journal of Operational Research, 164, 792-799.
[34] Ramsey, F.P. (1931) Truth and Probability. In: Braithwaite, R.B., Ed., The Foundations of Mathematics and other Logical Essays, Harcourt, Brace and Company, New York, 156-198.
[35] Anscombe, F.J. and Aumann, R.J. (1963) A Definition of Subjective Probability. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 34, 199-205.
[36] Haddock, J., Tzanopoulos, J., Mitchley, J. and Fraser, R. (2007) A Method for Evaluating Alternative Landscape Managementscenarios in Relation to the Biodiversity Conservation of Habitats. Ecological Economics, 61, 277-283.
[37] Oral, M. (2012) Action Research Contextualizes DEA in a Multi-Organizational Decision-Making Process. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 6503-6513.
[38] Bhattacharyya, R., Chatterjee, A. and Kar, S. (2013) Uncertainty Theory-Based Multiple Objective Mean-EntropySkewness Stock Portfolio Selection Model with Transaction Costs. Uncertainty Analysis and Applications, 1, 16.
[39] Ormos, M. and Zibriczky, D. (2013) Asset Pricing and Entropy. European Financial Systems 2013 Deev. Proceedings of the 10th International Scientific Conference, Masaryk University, Brno, 2013, 241-248.
[40] Gunderson, L.H., Holling, C.S. and Allen, C.R. (2010) Conclusion: The Evolution of an Idea-the Past, Present, and Future of Ecological Resilience. In: Gunderson, L.H., Allen, C.R. and Holling, C.S., Eds., Foundations of Ecological Resilience. Island Press, Washington DC, 423-444.
[41] Hubacek, K. and Van Den Bergh, J.C.J.M. (2006) Changing Concepts of Land in Economic Theory: From Single to Multi-Disciplinary Approaches. Ecological Economics, 56, 5-27.
[42] Clark, W.C., Jones, D.D. and Holling, C.S. (2010) Lessons for Ecological Policy Design: A Case Study of Ecosystem Management. In: Gunderson, L.H., Allen, C.R. and Holling, C.S., Eds., Foundations of Ecological Resilience, Island Press, Washington DC, 331-394.
[43] Allen, C.R., Gunderson, L.H. and Holling, C.S. (2010) Commentary on Part Three Articles. In: Gunderson, L.H., Allen, C.R. and Holling, C.S., Eds., Foundations of Ecological Resilience, Island Press, Washington DC, 301-307.
[44] Howard, R.A. (2008) The Foundations of Decision Analysis Revisited. In: Edwards, W., Milles Jr., R.F. and von Winterfeldt, D., Eds., Advances in Decision Analysis—From Foundations to Applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 32-56.
[45] Casquilho, J.P. (2013) Informacao útil ou Entropia Ponderada: Revisao e Desenvolvimentos. Revista Veritas, 1, 87-103.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.