Share This Article:

Subliminal Priming of Motivation Magnitude

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:194KB) PP. 804-807
DOI: 10.4236/psych.2013.411115    3,712 Downloads   5,147 Views  

ABSTRACT

Word primes have been successfully used in the past to facilitate the processing of other words (semantic priming), but also to modify mental states such as emotion, cognition and motivation (conceptual priming). This work documented that the direction of motivational drive can be successfully changed, but left open whether its magnitude can be influenced as well. To find out, we asked subjects to point at subliminally presented (30 ms) words that denoted low motivation (13 subjects) or high motivation (13 subjects). Afterwards, subjects completed a questionnaire of learning-specific motivation. No effect of priming was found for pointing parameters such as reaction time, but an effect emerged for self-assessed motivation level. The subject group primed with high-motivation words rated their motivation higher than the group primed with low-motivation words. The results indicate that not only the direction, but also the level of motivation can be manipulated subliminally, and supports the view that motivation can influence behavior without actor’s explicit knowledge.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Steinberg, F. , Bock, O. & Dern, S. (2013). Subliminal Priming of Motivation Magnitude. Psychology, 4, 804-807. doi: 10.4236/psych.2013.411115.

References

[1] Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407-428.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.82.6.407
[2] Custers, R., & Aarts, H. (2010). The unconscious will: How the pursuit of goals operates outside of conscious awareness. Science, 329, 47-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1188595
[3] Greenwald, A. G., Draine, S. C., & Abrams, R. L. (1996). Three cognitive markers of unconscious semantic activation. Science, 273, 1699-1702. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.273.5282.1699
[4] Hart, W., & Albaraccin, D. (2009). The effects of chronic achievement motivation and achievement primes on the activation of achievement and fun goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1129-1141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0017146
[5] Hüttermann, S., Memmert, D., & Bock, O. (2012). Semantic priming of attention focus: Evidence for short-and long-term effects. Psychology, 3, 128-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/psych.2012.32019
[6] Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., & Hoffmann, J. (2007). Mechanisms of subliminal response priming. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 3, 307-315.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10053-008-0032-1
[7] Levy, D. A., Stark, C. E. L., & Squire, L. R. (2004). Intact conceptual priming in the absence of declarative memory. Psychological Science, 15, 680-686. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00740.x
[8] Mayer, J., & Mussweiler, T. (2011). Suspicious spirits, flexible minds: When distrust enhances creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1262-1277. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0024407
[9] Meyer, D., & Schvaneveldt, R. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90, 227-234.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0031564
[10] Michalak, J., Heidenreich, T., Strohle, G., & Nachtigall, C. (2008). Die deutsche Version der Mindful Attention and Awareness Scale (MAAS) Psychometrische Befunde zu einem Achtsamkeitsfragebogen. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 37, 200-208.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1026/1616-3443.37.3.200
[11] Radel, R., Sarrazin, P., Legrain, P., & Gobancé, L. (2009). Subliminal priming of motivational orientation in educational settings: Effect on academic performance moderated by mindfulness. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 695-698.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.02.011
[12] Rheinberg, F., Vollmeyer, R., & Burns, B. D. (2001). FAM: Ein Fragebogen zur Erfassung aktueller Motivation in Lern-und leistungssituationen. Diagnostica, 47, 57-66.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1026//0012-1924.47.2.57
[13] Rushworth, M. F. S., & Behrens, T. E. J. (2008). Choice, uncertainty and value in prefrontal and cingulate cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 11, 389-397. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn2066
[14] Smith, E. R., & Branscombe, N. R. (1988). Category accessibility as implicit memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 490-504. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(88)90048-0
[15] Steinberg, F., & Bock, O. (under review). Differential effects of motivation on grasping.
[16] Weiner, B. (1992). Human motivation: Metaphors, theories, and research (2 ed.). London: Sage.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.