Share This Article:

The Role of Fiscal Policy in Spain from 2007 to 2010 and the Influence of Aggregate Public Spending on Economic Growth

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:304KB) PP. 59-75
DOI: 10.4236/ojbm.2013.13009    3,616 Downloads   6,671 Views  

ABSTRACT

In the early stages of the crisis that is currently affecting the Spanish economy, the fiscal policy that excessively resorted to automatic stabilizers helped overwhelm the deficit and public debt. In this context, first, in this paper we analyse the trend and variation rate of government revenue as well as expenditure on final consumption and government investment in the last 15 years in relation to the business cycle. In another vein, we also explore and quantify the impact of the countercyclical policies provided from 2007 to 2010 and their impact on the tax burden, which enables us to evaluate the stabilizing role of fiscal policy and thus highlight its fragility. Second, given the challenges of budgetary stability facing the Spanish economy, and always based on the above analysis in which we display the limited room for fiscal manoeuvre, we present the effects of aggregate public spending in a systematic and quantified way as well as its composition as an instrument of fiscal policy. In this framework, a long term stable equilibrium relationship is studied, based on two bivariate models that cointegrate econometrically, that is to say, to estimate models for error correction for cointegrated nonstationary series (and ultimately able to anticipate the evolution of the Spanish economy), we estimate and assess the contribution of spending on investment and government final consumption on aggregate output as well as its differential effect, to assess the concrete impact of the measures applied and ultimately the role of fiscal policy implemented in the early years of the crisis and those that will be designed in the future. Finally, the main conclusion given by the model of behaviour for the final consumption expenditure of general government and GDP, is the existence of delayed adverse effects on the rate of growth of public spending on growth rate GDP. Taking into account the response function of GDP for a boost in public consumption, we estimate that with a lag of two years, an increase in the growth rate of public consumption is falling in the rates of change of aggregate output. Moreover, we can also deduce that the delayed effects of the rate of decline in public investment have a negative impact on economic growth.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Piqué, M. and Martín, J. (2013) The Role of Fiscal Policy in Spain from 2007 to 2010 and the Influence of Aggregate Public Spending on Economic Growth. Open Journal of Business and Management, 1, 59-75. doi: 10.4236/ojbm.2013.13009.

References

[1] E. Alberola and F. Gutiérrez del Arroyo, “Crisis Económica y Financiera; Respuestas de Política y su Impacto Sobre las Finanzas Públicas. Una Perspectiva Global,” Boletín Económico del Banco de Espana, Mayo, 2009, pp. 87-106.
[2] F. De Castro, E. Gordo and J. Pérez, “La Política Fiscal Discrecional en Tiempos de Crisis,” Presupuesto y Gasto Público, Vol. 2, No. 59, 2010, pp. 83-102.
[3] J. M. Labeaga, “Reformas Fiscales de Impuestos Indirectos: Un Programa Disimulación para Espana,” Hacienda Pública Espanola, Vol. 2, No. 133, 1995, pp. 131-144.
[4] Eurostat: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu
[5] Tax Agency: http://www.agenciatributaria.es
[6] Bank of Spain: http://www.bde.es/bde/es
[7] National Institute of Statistics: http://www.ine.es
[8] Official State Bulletin: http://www.boe.es
[9] Ministry of Finance and Public Administration: http://www.minhap.gob.es
[10] Ministry of Public Works: http://www.fomento.gob.es
[11] P. Hernández de Cos and C. Thomas, “El Impacto de la Consolidación Fiscal Sobre el Crecimiento Económico. Una Ilustración para la Economía a Partir de un Modelo de Equilibrio General,” Documentos Ocasionales, Banco de Espana, No. 1205, 2012, pp. 9-20.
[12] Instituto de la Empresa Familiar, “Análisis Comparativo de los Principales Impuestos en la Unión Europea, Estados Unidos y países BRIC,” Documento 161, 2011, pp. 13-33. http://www.iefamiliar.com/web/es/estudios/2011/estudio.html
[13] R. Barro and X. Sala-i-Martin, “Public Finance in Models of Economic Growth,” Review of Economic Studies, No. 59, 1995, pp. 654-661.
[14] J. Galí, D. López and J. Vallés, “Understanding the Effects of Government Spending on Consumption,” Journal of the European Economic Association, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2007, pp. 227-270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/JEEA.2007.5.1.227
[15] R. Grier, “Governments, Unions and Economic Growth,” Government and growth, Oxford, 1997, pp. 149-183.
[16] P. Hanson and M. Herrekson, “A New Framework for Testing the Effect of Government Spending on Growth and Productivity,” Public Choice, Vol. 81, No. 3-4, 1994, pp. 381-401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01053239
[17] J. L. Hernández, “La Composición del Gasto Público y el Crecimiento Económico,” Análisis Económico, Vol. 24, No. 55, 2008, pp. 78-102.
[18] E. Hsieh and K. S. Lai, “Government Spending and Economic Growth: The G-7 Experience,” Applied Economics, Vol. 26, No. 5, 1994, pp. 535-542. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00036849400000022
[19] A. Pulido, “Economía en Acción,” Editorial Pirámide, Madrid, 2003.
[20] B. Van Ark and N. Crafts, “Quantitative Aspects of Post-War European Economic Growth,” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996.
[21] P. Argimón, J. M. González-Páramo, M. Martin and J. Roldán, “Productividad e Infraestructuras en la Economía Espanola,” Moneda y Crédito, No. 198, 1994, pp. 207-252.
[22] R. J. Barro, “Inflation and Economic Growth,” Bank of England Economic Bulletin, Vol. 35, No. 1, 1995, pp. 1-11.
[23] M. J. Delgado and I. álvarez, “Capital Público y Eficiencia Productiva: Evidencia para la UE15,” Hacienda Pública Espanola, Vol. 1, No. 168, 2003, pp. 27-43.
[24] A. De la Fuente, “Infraestructures i Política Regional,” Nota d’Economia, No. 73, 2002, pp. 91-114.
[25] M. Mas, F. Pérez and E. Uriel, “El Stock y los Servicios del Capital en Espana y su Distribución Territorial y Sectorial (1964-2010),” Documento de Trabajo, Fundación BBVA, No. 4, 2011.
[26] X. Raurich and H. Sala, “L’Impacteeconòmic de la Inversió Pública a Catalunya: Una Aproximació Desagregada,” Nota d’Economia, Vol. 1, No. 83-84, 2006, pp. 9-30.
[27] O. Roca and H. Sala, “Efectos Desbordamiento de la Inversión en Infraestructuras en las Regiones Espanolas,” Investigaciones Regionales, No. 8, 2006, pp. 143-161.
[28] C. Díaz and D. Martínez, “Inversión Pública y Crecimiento Económico: Un Panorama,” Hacienda Pública Espanola, Vol. 1, No. 176, 2006, pp. 109-140.
[29] T. García-Milá, T. McGuire and R. Porter, “The Effect of Public Capital in State-Level Production Functions Reconsidered,” Review of Economics and Statistic, Vol. 78, No. 1, 1996, pp. 177-180. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2109857
[30] J. M. González-Páramo,“Infraestructuras, Productividad y Bienestar,” Investigaciones Económicas, Vol. 19, No. 1, 1995, pp. 155-168.
[31] J. L. Torres-Chacón, “Capital Público y Crecimiento Económico en Espana 1980-2004,” Hacienda Pública Espanola, Vol. 1, No. 188, 2009, pp. 31-54.
[32] R. Engle and C. W. J. Granger, “Co-Integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation and Testing,” Econometrica, Vol. 55, No. 2, 1989, pp. 251-276. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1913236
[33] D. DicKey and W. A. Fuller, “Distribution of the Estimators Autorregresive Time-Series with a Unit Root,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 74, No. 366, 1979, pp. 427-431.
[34] P. Perron, “Testing for a Unit Root in a Time Series with a Changing Mean,” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, No. 8, 1990, pp. 153-162.
[35] N. D. Gujarati, “Econometria,” McGraw-Hill, Mexico, 2003.
[36] C. W. J. Granger, “Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods,” Econometrica, Vol. 37, No. 3, 1969, pp.424-438. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1912791
[37] C. Granger and P. Newbold, “Identification of Two-Way Causal Models,” Frontiers of Quantitative Economics, No. 3, 1977, pp. 337-360.
[38] C. Pérez, “Econometría de las Series Temporales,” Prentice-Hall, Madrid, 2006.
[39] S. Johansen and K. Juselius, “Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegration—with Applications to the Demand for Money,” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 52, No. 2, 1990, pp. 169-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.1990.mp52002003.x
[40] S. Johansen, “Determination of the Cointegration Rank in the Presence of a Linear Trend,” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 54, No. 3, 1992, pp. 383-397. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.1992.tb00008.x
[41] S. Johansen, “Testing Weak Exogenety and the Order of Cointegration in UK Money Demand Data,” Journal of Policy Modeling, Vol. 14, No. 3, 1992, pp. 313-334. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0161-8938(92)90003-U

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.