[1]
|
Barret, M., & Davidson, M. J. (2006). Gender and Communication at Work. Aldeshot: Ashgate Publishing.
|
[2]
|
Baruffol, E. P. Verger, & Rotily, M. (2001). Using the telephone for mental health surveys. An analysis of the impact of call rank, non response, and interviewer effect. Population, 56, 987-1010.
doi:10.2307/1534750
|
[3]
|
Bethlehem, J. G. (2002). Weighting nonresponse adjustment based on auxiliary information. In R. M. Groves, D. A. Dillman, J. L. Eltinge, & J. A. Roderick (Eds.), Survey Nonresponse (pp. 275-288). New York: Wiley.
|
[4]
|
Biemans, M. (2000). Gender variation in voice quality. Utrecht: Lot.
|
[5]
|
Brouwer, D. (1989). Gender variation in Dutch: A sociolinguistic study of Amsterdam speech. Dordrecht: Foris.
|
[6]
|
Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
|
[7]
|
Cacioppo, J., & Petty, R. (1982). Language variables, attitudes, and persuasion. In E. B. Ryan, & H. Giles (Eds.), Attitudes towards language variation (pp. 189-207). London: Edward Arnold.
|
[8]
|
Cohen, J. (1992). Quantitative methods in psychology: A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
|
[9]
|
Couper, M., & de Leeuw, E. (2003). Nonresponse in cross-cultural and cross-national surveys. In J. Harkness, F. van de Vijver, & P. Mohler (Eds.), Cross-cultural survey methods (pp. 157-178). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
|
[10]
|
Coupland, N., & Giles, H. (1988). Introduction: The communicative context of accommodation. Language and communication, 8, 75-182. doi:10.1016/0271-5309(88)90015-8
|
[11]
|
Curtin, R., Presser, S., & Singer, E. (2000). The effects of response rates changes on the index of consumer sentiment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, 413-428. doi:10.1086/318638
|
[12]
|
Curtin, R., Presser, S., & Singer, E. (2005). Changes in telephone survey nonresponse over the past quarter century. Public Opinion Quar terly, 69, 87-98. doi:10.1093/poq/nfi002
|
[13]
|
Daan, J., & Blok, D. (1969). From the urban agglomeration of Western Holland to the border. Explanation of the map dialects and onomastics, the atlas of the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Noord-Hollandsche Uitgevers Maatschappij.
|
[14]
|
De Heer, W. (1999). International response trends. Journal of Official Statistics, 15, 129-142.
|
[15]
|
Dehue, F. (1997). Results observation introduction behaviour com muters. Heerlen: Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek.
|
[16]
|
De Leeuw, E. D., & de Heer, W. (2002). Trends in household survey nonresponse. In R. M. Groves, D. A. Dillman, J. L. Eltinge, & J. A. Roderick (Eds.), Survey nonresponse (pp. 41-54). New York: Wiley.
|
[17]
|
De Leeuw, E. D., Callegaro, M., Hox, J., Korendijk, E., & Lensveldt Mulders, G. (2007). The influence of advance letters on response in telephone surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71, 413-443.
doi:10.1093/poq/nfm014
|
[18]
|
Dijkstra, W., & Smit, J. H. (2002). Persuading reluctant recipients in telephone surveys. In R. M. Groves, D. A. Dillman, J. L. Eltinge, and R. J. A. Little (Eds.), Survey nonresponse. (pp. 121-134), New York: Wiley.
|
[19]
|
Durrant, G. B., Groves, R. M., Staetsky, L., & Steele, F. (2010). Effects of interviewer attitudes and behaviors on refusal in household surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74, 1-36. doi:10.1093/poq/nfp098
|
[20]
|
Eimers, T., & Thomas, E. (2000). Instruction callcenter personnel demands new approach. Nijmegen: ITS.
|
[21]
|
Feskens, R., Hox, J., Lensveldt-Mulders, G., & Schmeets, H. (2007). Nonresponse among ethnic minorities: A multivariate analysis. Journal of Official Statistics, 2, 387-408.
|
[22]
|
Fienberg, S. E. (2007). The analysis of cross-classified categorical data. New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-72825-4
|
[23]
|
Gerritsen, M., & van Bezooijen, R. (1996). How can I increase the effect of my telemarketing business? Ad Rem, 4, 9-12.
|
[24]
|
Gerritsen, M., & Palmen, M.-J. (2002). The effect of prenotification techniques on the refusal rate in telephone surveys. A real-life study in the light of the compliance and elaboration likelihood theory. Document Design, 3, 16-29. doi:10.1075/dd.3.1.04ger
|
[25]
|
Giles, H. (1973). Communicative effectiveness as a function of ac cented speech. Speech Monographs, 40, 330-331.
doi:10.1080/03637757309375813
|
[26]
|
Grondelaers, S. A., & van Hout, R. W. N. M. (2010). Is standard Dutch with a regional accent standard or not? Evidence from native speakers’ attitudes. Language Variation and Change, 22, 221-239.
doi:10.1017/S0954394510000086
|
[27]
|
Grondelaers, S. A., van Hout, R. W. N. M., & Steegs, M. (2010). Evaluating regional accent variation in standard Dutch. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29, 101-116.
doi:10.1177/0261927X09351681
|
[28]
|
Groves, R. M. (2006). Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70, 646-675.
doi:10.1093/poq/nfl033
|
[29]
|
Groves, R. M. (2011). Three eras of survey research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75, 661-671. doi:10.1093/poq/nfr057
|
[30]
|
Groves, R. M., Dilman, D. A., Eltinge, J. L., & Little, R. J. A. (2002). Survey nonresponse. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
|
[31]
|
Groves, R. M., Cialdini, B., & Couper, M. (1992). Understanding the decision to participate in a survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56, 475-495. doi:10.1086/269338
|
[32]
|
Groves, R. M., & Couper, M. (1996a). Nonresponse in household interview surveys. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
|
[33]
|
Groves, R. M., & Couper, M. (1996b). Contact-level influences on cooperation in face-to-face surveys. Journal of Official Statistics, 12, 63-83.
|
[34]
|
Groves, R. M., & Fultz, N. (1985). Gender effects among telephone interviewers in a survey of economic attitudes. Sociological Methods and Research, 14, 31-52. doi:10.1177/0049124185014001002
|
[35]
|
Groves, R. M., & McGonagle, K. A. (2001). A theory-guided inter viewer training protocol regarding survey participation. Journal of Official Statistics, 17, 249-265.
|
[36]
|
Groves, R. M., O’Hare, B. C., Gould-Smith, D., Benkí, J., & Maher, P. (2008). Telephone interviewer voice characteristics and the survey participation decision. In J. M. Lepkowski, C. Tucker, J. M. Brick, E. de Leeuw, L. Japec, P. J. Lavrakas, M. W. Link, & R. L. Sangster (Eds.), Advances in telephone survey methodology (pp. 385-400). New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
|
[37]
|
Groves, R. M., & Peytcheva, E. (2008). The impact of nonresponse rates on nonresponse bias. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 167-189.
doi:10.1093/poq/nfn011
|
[38]
|
Hansen, K. M. (2007). The effect of incentives, interview length, and interviewer characteristics on response rates in a CAT study. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 19, 112-121.
doi:10.1093/ijpor/edl022
|
[39]
|
Heijmer, T., & Vonk, R. (2002). Effects of a regional accent on the evaluation of the speaker. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psy chologie, 57, 108-113.
|
[40]
|
Holmes, J., & Meyerhoff, M. (2005). The handbook of language and gender. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
|
[41]
|
Hoppenbrouwers, C. (2001). The classification of Dutch dialects. Dialects of 156 towns and villages classified according the FFM. Assen: Koninklijke Van Gorcum.
|
[42]
|
Houtkoop-Steenstra, H., & van den Bergh, H. (2000). Effects of introductions in large-scale telephone survey interviews. Sociological Methods and Research, 28, 281-300.
doi:10.1177/0049124100028003002
|
[43]
|
Hox, J. J., & de Leeuw, E. D. (2002). The influence of interviewers’ attitude and behavior on household survey nonresponse: An international comparison. In R. M. Groves, D. A. Dillman, J. L. Eltinge, & J. A. Roderick (Eds.), Survey nonresponse (pp. 103-120). New York: Wiley.
|
[44]
|
Keeter, S., Miller, C., Kohut, A., Groves, R. M., & Presser, S. (2000). Consequences of reducing nonresponse in a national telephone survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, 125-148.
doi:10.1086/317759
|
[45]
|
Keeter, S., Kennedy, C., Dimock, M., Best, J., & Craighill, P. (2006). Gauging the impact of growing nonresponse on estimates from a national RDD telephone survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70, 759 779. doi:10.1093/poq/nfl035
|
[46]
|
Kraaykamp, G. (2005). Dialect and social inequality: An empirical study of the social-economic consequences of speaking a dialect in one’s youth. Pedagogische Studi?n, 85, 390-403.
|
[47]
|
Lambert, W. (1967). A social psychology of bilingualism. Journal of Social Issues, 23, 91-109. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1967.tb00578.x
|
[48]
|
Mai, R., & Hoffmann, S. (2011). Four positive effects of a sales person’s regional dialect in services selling. Journal of Service Research, 14, 460-474. doi:10.1177/1094670511414551
|
[49]
|
Maynard, D. W., & Schaeffer, N. C. (1997). Keeping the gate. Decli nations of the request to participate in a telephone survey interview. Sociological Methods and Research, 26, 34-79.
doi:10.1177/0049124197026001002
|
[50]
|
Merkle, D., & Edelman, M. (2002). Nonresponse in exit polls: A comprehensive analysis. In R. M. Groves, D. A. Dillman, J. L. Eltinge, & J. A. Roderick (Eds.), Survey nonresponse (pp. 243-258). New York: Wiley.
|
[51]
|
Merkle, D., Edelman, M., Dykeman, K., & Brogan, C. (1998). An experimental study of ways to increase exit poll response rates and re duce survey error. The Annual Meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, St. Louis.
|
[52]
|
Milroy, J., & Milroy, L. (1999). Authority in language: Investigating standard English. London: Routledge.
|
[53]
|
Oksenberg, L., Coleman, L., & Cannel, C. F. (1986). Interviewers’ voices and refusal rates in telephone surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 50, 97-111. doi:10.1086/268962
|
[54]
|
Oksenberg, L., & Cannell, C. F. (1988). Effects of vocal characteristics on nonresponse. In R. Groves, P. P. Biemer, L. E. Lyberg, J. T. Massey, W. L. Nicholls, & J. Waksberg (Eds.), Telephone survey methodology (pp. 257-273). New York: Wiley.
|
[55]
|
Palmen, M.-J. (2001). Response in telephone surveys. A study of the effect of sociolinguistic factors. Nijmegen: Nijmegen University Press.
|
[56]
|
Pickery, J., & Loosveldt, G. (1998). The impact of respondent and in terviewer characteristics on the number of “no opinion” answers: A multilevel model for count data. Quality and Quantity, 32, 31-45.
doi:10.1023/A:1004268427793
|
[57]
|
Pondman, L. M. (1998). The influence of the interviewer on the refusal rate in telephone surveys. Amsterdam: Print Partners Ipskamp.
|
[58]
|
Singer, E. (2006). Introduction. Nonresponse bias in household surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70, 637-645. doi:10.1093/poq/nfl034
|
[59]
|
Singer, E., van Hoewyk, J., Gebler, N., Ragunathan, T., & McGonacle, K. (1999). The effect of incentives on response rates in interview mediated surveys. Journal of Official Statistics, 15, 217-230.
|
[60]
|
Smakman, D. (2006). Standard Dutch in the Netherlands. A sociolinguistic and phonetic description. Utrecht: Lot.
|
[61]
|
Snijkers, C., Hox, J., & de Leeuw, E. D. (1999). Interviewers’ tactics for fighting survey nonresponse. Journal of Official Statistics, 15, 185-198.
|
[62]
|
Steeh, C. (1981). Trends in nonresponse rates. Public Opinion Quarterly, 45, 40-57. doi:10.1086/268633
|
[63]
|
Steeh, C., Kirgis, N., Cannon, B., & DeWitt, J. (2001). Are they really as bad as they seem? Nonresponse rates at the end of the 20th century. Journal of Official Statistics, 17, 227-247.
|
[64]
|
Stoop, I. A. L. (2005). The hunt for the last respondent. Nonresponse in sample surveys. The Hague: Sociaalen Cultureel Planbureau.
|
[65]
|
Stoop, I., Billiet, J., Koch, A., & Fitzgerald. R. (2010). Improving survey response. Lessons learned from the european social survey. Chicester: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd. doi:10.1002/9780470688335
|
[66]
|
Tielen, M. (1992). Male and female speech: An experimental study of sex-related voice and pronunciation characteristics. Ph.D. Thesis, Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
|
[67]
|
Van Bezooijen, R. (1995). Sociocultural aspects of pitch differences between Japanese and Dutch women. Language and Speech, 38, 253 265.
|
[68]
|
Van der Vaart, W., Ongena, Y., Hoogendoorn, A., & Dijkstra, W. (2005). Do interviewers’ voice characteristics influence cooperation rates in telephone surveys? International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18, 488-499. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edh117
|
[69]
|
Van Ingen, E., Stoop, I., & Breedveld, K. (2009). Nonresponse in the Dutch time use survey: Strategies for response enhancement and bias reduction. Field Methods, 21, 69-90.
doi:10.1177/1525822X08323099
|
[70]
|
Vercruyssen, A., van de Putte, B., & Stoop, I. A. L. (2011). Are they really too busy for survey participation? The evolution of busyness and busyness claims in Flanders. Journal of Official Statistics, 27, 619-632.
|
[71]
|
Visscher, G. (1999a). Het CBS is niet meer geloofwaardig. Statistics Netherlands is not trustworthy anymore. NRC Handelsblad, 21 January 1999.
|
[72]
|
Visscher, G. (1999b). CBS overschrijdt de grens van het betamelijke (Statistics Netherlands exceeds bounds of decency). NRC Handels blad, 1 February 1999.
|
[73]
|
Walrave, M. (1996). Telemarketing: Breakdown on the line? Leuven/ Amersfoort: Acco.
|
[74]
|
Wenemark, M., Persson, A., Brage, H. N., Svensson, T., & Kristenson, M. (2011). Applying motivation theory to achieve increased response rates, respondent satisfaction, and data quality. Journal of Official Statistics, 27, 393-414.
|