Base-X Conjecture and Collatz Conjecture Proof
Sheng Zhao
Vancouver, Canada.
DOI: 10.4236/am.2025.164020   PDF    HTML   XML   14 Downloads   120 Views  

Abstract

A new Base-X Conjecture was introduced in this paper, and Collatz Conjecture is just one case of Base-X Conjecture - Base-3 (Ternary). Based on Base-X number system property and Collatz Conjecture iteration, it has been proved that for any positive integer D, there are n and m which exist for D n + Y n = 2 m . D n + Y n is just the result built up by collecting divided by 2 of Collatz Conjecture iteration. Divided by 2m will make the Collatz Conjecture get a result of 1 for any positive integer. Also, the Collatz Tree showed that for any odd positive number, there is only one route existing in the Collatz Tree down to 1 on Collatz Conjecture iteration.

Share and Cite:

Zhao, S. (2025) Base-X Conjecture and Collatz Conjecture Proof. Applied Mathematics, 16, 365-382. doi: 10.4236/am.2025.164020.

1. Introduction

Collatz Conjecture is one of the most famous unsolved problems in mathematics. It is simply stated, easily understood. Even many efforts to solve the problem have been made [1] [2], the Collatz conjecture itself remains open. Professor Paul Erdos said about the Collatz conjecture: “Mathematics may not be ready for such problems” [3]. Professor Jeffrey Lagarias stated in 2010 that the Collatz conjecture “is an extraordinarily difficult problem, completely out of reach of present day mathematics” [4]. Even more research on Collatz Conjecture [5]-[16], it is still not able to prove that Collatz Conjecture will turn to 1 for any positive integer. But what Collatz Conjecture exactly is, and why is 3n + 1? It is suggested in this paper that Collatz Conjecture is related to such a conjecture called Base-X Conjecture, in a Base-X number system, for any positive integer, if divisible by the maximum number of the base X1 (even-x number), divide it by X1 (even-step), if not (odd-x number), make it be divisible by X1 (odd-step), repeat this iteration, the result 1 could be reached. A number is called pure even-x number if can be expressed as X 1 k . Number 1 is a special number in Base-X number system, for number 1 itself is an odd-x number, but X 1 0 is a pure even-x number by definition and still equals to 1.

2. Base-X Number System

A Base-X Number System uses X different digits (from 0 to X1) to represent numbers, with each digit’s positional value increasing by a power of X as moving left in the number. The digits can be paired in X1’s compliment that sum of each pair equals X1. Pair [0, X1] are even-x digit, the rest are odd-x digit. see Figure 1: Base-X.

Figure 1. Base-X.

If X is an odd number, the middle one is just paired itself. See Figure 2: Base-7 (Septenary).

Figure 2. Base-7 (Septenary).

Simple Properties of Base-X Number System

(1) Any positive number D in Base-X Number System can be expressed as the product of a pure even-x number and an odd-x number:

D= X 1 k ( Q X 1 +r )r=1,2,3,, X 4 , X 3 , X 2 (1)

Q is either odd-x or even-x number.

For any odd-x number D, k = 0, D = Q * X1 + r.

If Q = 0 and k = 0, D is a single digit odd-x number, D = r.

If Q = 0 and r = 1, D is a pure even-x number, D = X 1 k .

(2) multiple D by X did not affect k and r in property (1)

DX= X 1 k ( Q X 1 +r )X = X 1 k ( Q X 1 +r )( X 1 +1 ) = X 1 k [ ( Q X 1 +r ) X 1 +Q X 1 +r ] = X 1 k [ ( Q X 1 +r+Q ) X 1 +r ] = X 1 k ( Q 1 X 1 +r ) (2)

(3) from property (2) can be derived that multiple D by Xn did not affect k and r

D X n = X 1 k ( Q n X 1 +r ) (3)

if D is a single digit r, the remainder of r*Xn divided by X1 is r itself.

(4) any odd-x D can be converted to even-x number by:

D X n + r r is X 1 'scomplimentofr = Q n X 1 +r+ r = Q n X 1 + X 1 =( Q n +1 ) X 1 (4)

(5) for any integer D, adding up all the digits of D until to get a single digit r, if the result r = X1, D is even-x number, otherwise D is odd-x number, r is the remainder of D divided by X1.

Any positive integer D can be expressed as:

D= i=0 n d i X i d=1,2,3,, X 3 , X 2 , X 1

from property (3), each item diXi divided by X1, the remainder should be di, so the remainder R of D divided by X1 should be:

R= i=0 n d i d=1,2,3,, X 3 , X 2 , X 1

R is a new number with less digits than D, repeating above processing, a single digit could be obtained.

Take Hexadecimal for example (X1 = F):

for hex number 2E35F9BD67

2+E+3+5+F+9+B+D+6+7=55

5+5=A

so it is an odd-16 number, and the remainder of divided by F is A.

2E35F9BD67=314AA3FD3F+A

for hex number 7E35F9BD67

7+E+3+5+F+9+B+D+6+7=5A

5+A=F

so it is an even-16 number.

7E35F9BD67=869FF9529F

3. Base-X Conjecture

For the simply stated Base-X Conjecture in Section 1, property (4) was used to make an odd-x number (k = 0) to an even-x number.

3.1. n = 0

For any odd-x positive integer D

D+ r =Q X 1 +r+ r =( Q+1 ) X 1

divided by X1 result is Q + 1. The Base-X Conjecture iteration is converging due to D > Q + 1, so the Conjecture is true.

3.2. n ≥ 2

The Base-X Conjecture iteration is mostly diverging, so the Conjecture could be false. This will not be discussed in this paper.

3.3. n = 1

DX+ r =( Q X 1 +r ) X 1 +r+ r =( Q X 1 +r ) X 1 + X 1 =( Q X 1 +r+1 ) X 1

(a) for a single digit number Q = 0

rX+ r =r( X 1 +1 )+ r =r X 1 +( r+ r )=r X 1 + X 1 =( r+1 ) X 1

the result r is increased by 1 after one odd-step and one even-step. If the result (r + 1) = X1, take another even-step that will get 1, otherwise repeat the iteration until the result (r + 1) = X1. Base-X conjecture is true for a single digit number.

(b) if (r + 1) = X1 and (Q + 1) = X 1 m , Base-X conjecture is true.

D= ( X 1 2n 1 )/X , ( n=1,2,3, ) meets this condition.

3.4. Base-X Conjecture Definition

Based on above analysis, use property (4) of Base-X number system with n = 1 to convert odd-x number to even-x.

  • If the number is even-x, divide it by X1.

  • If the number is odd-x, left shift 1 digit (multiply by X) and add X1’s compliment of the remainder divided by X1.

In modular arithmetic notation, define the function f as follows:

f( n )={ n/ X 1 ifn0( mod X 1 ) Xn+ r ifnr( mod X 1 )

for Collatz Conjecture, it should be one of Base-X conjecture - Base-3 (Ternary). For Base-3 (Ternary), X1 = 2, and there is only one remainder 1 if odd-3 (odd) number divided by 2, 2’s compliment of 1 is still 1, here comes 3n + 1. The Base-X conjecture for Base-3 (Ternary) is as follows:

f( n )={ n/2 ifn0( mod2 ) 3n+1 ifn1( mod2 )

It is exactly the same as Collatz Conjecture.

3.5. Base-X Conjecture Verification

Till now, the Base-X Conjecture is neither proved nor disproved, but a preliminary verification can be done by computer. There are a total of 28 bases from Base-3 (Ternary) to Base-30 (Tricenary) up to 10 digits have been verified, the verification results are shown in Table 1.

Table 1. The verification results from Base-3 (Ternary) to Base-30 (Tricenary).

Base

Digit Number

Loop#1 Steps

Loop#2 Steps

Loop#3 Steps

True False

X

Name

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Odd

Even

Total

Odd

Even

Total

Odd

Even

Total

3

Ternary (Tertial)

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

2

3

TRUE?

4

Quaternary (Quartal)

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

3

5

7

8

16

FALSE

5

Quinary (Quintal)

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

3

4

7

12

14

26

FALSE

6

Senary (Sextal)

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

4

5

9

TRUE?

7

Septenary (Septimal)

1

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

5

6

11

11

12

23

23

25

48

FALSE

8

Octonary (Octal)

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

6

7

13

TRUE?

9

Nonary (Nonal)

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

7

8

15

TRUE?

10

Denary (Decimal)

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

8

9

17

20

21

41

FALSE

11

Undenary (Undecimal)

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

9

10

19

47

49

96

FALSE

12

Duodenary (Duodecimal)

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

10

11

21

55

57

112

FALSE

13

Terdenary (Tredecimal)

1

0

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

11

12

23

93

96

189

31

32

63

FALSE

14

Quattuordenary (Quattuordecimal)

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

12

13

25

TRUE?

15

Quindenary (Quindecimal)

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

-

-

13

14

27

TRUE?

16

Senidenary (Hexadecimal)

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

-

-

14

15

29

40

41

81

FALSE

17

septendenary (Septendecimal)

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

-

-

15

16

31

45

46

91

FALSE

18

Octodenary (Octodecimal)

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

-

-

16

17

33

48

49

97

FALSE

19

Novendenary (Novendecimal)

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

-

-

17

18

35

TRUE?

20

Vigenary (Vigesimal)

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

-

-

18

19

37

TRUE?

21

Viginti-unary (Viginti-unal)

1

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

-

-

19

20

39

59

60

119

60

61

121

FALSE

22

Viginti-binary (Viginti-dual)

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

-

-

20

21

41

TRUE?

23

Viginti-ternary (Viginti-tertial)

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

-

-

-

21

22

43

TRUE?

24

Viginti-quaternary (Viginti-quartal)

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

-

-

-

22

23

45

71

72

143

FALSE

25

Viginti-quinary (Viginti-quintal)

1

2

0

0

0

0

0

-

-

-

23

24

47

77

78

155

155

157

312

FALSE

26

Viginti-senary (Viginti-sextal)

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

-

-

-

24

25

49

82

83

165

FALSE

27

Viginti-septenary (Viginti-septimal)

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

-

-

-

25

26

51

TRUE?

28

Viginti-octonary (Viginti-octal)

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

-

-

-

26

27

53

90

91

181

FALSE

29

Viginti-nonary (Viginti-nonal)

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

-

-

-

27

28

55

TRUE?

30

Tricenary (Trigesimal)

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

-

-

-

28

29

57

96

97

193

FALSE

Note: - not verified.

The table showed loops found for different digits number, and the steps for the loops found. There are a total of 28 bases verified, 16 bases are false due to more than 1 loop found. 12 bases could be true including Collatz Conjecture (Base-3). There is no diverging found, and no more loops found for more than 3 digits to maximum checked digits. Now we will try to prove the Base-3 (Collatz Conjecture) for it is the simple one, only dealing with a single digit 1.

4. Collatz Conjecture Proof

If a positive integer D after n odd-step and m even-step turn to 1, this can be expressed as:

D n + Y n = 2 m (5)

where D n = 3 n D . For any positive integer D, if such Yn existed based on Collatz Conjecture iteration, Collatz Conjecture should be true. Now what is needed to do is to figure out how Y is built up along with Collatz Conjecture iteration. From now on, odd and even are used instead of odd-3 and even-3 for Base-3 (Ternary). Decimal number will be used for convenience if not stated otherwise.

4.1. Y Built up

It is already stated that “Collatz Conjecture, it is just one case of Base-X conjecture for Base-3 (Ternary)” in 3.4, so simple properties of Base-X number system could be used to figure it out. For any positive integer D in Base-3 can be expressed as following based on property (3):

D= 2 k( 0 ) ( Q2+1 )k( 0 )=0,1,2,3, (6)

Now we can apply Collatz Conjecture iteration to the odd part and collect the divided by 2 and put it to the even part. Any odd number to another odd number, one odd-step and one or more even-step (simply called one step together) needed. For example:

1) Number 3:

33+1=105 ,

one odd step and one even step, collect one divided by 2 → 2k(0)+1.

2) Number 9:

39+1=28147 ,

one odd step and two even steps, collect two divided by 2 → 2k(0)+2.

3) Number 13:

313+1=4020105 ,

one odd step and three even steps, collect three divided by 2 → 2k(0)+3.

4) Number 37:

337+1=1125628147 ,

one odd step and four even steps, collect four divided by 2 → 2k(0)+4.

Generally for Equation [6], just apply 3n + 1 and divided by 2 to the odd part (Q * 2 + 1) and pass divided by 2 to 2k portion we got:

2 k( 0 ) [ 3( Q2+1 )+1 ] =3[ 2 k( 0 ) ( Q2+1 ) ]+ 2 k( 0 ) =3D+ 2 k( 0 ) collect0 = D 1 + Y 1 D 1 =  3 1 D, Y 1 = 2 k( 0 ) , D 1 > Y 1 (7)

in another way,

2 k( 0 ) [ 3( Q2+1 )+1 ] = 2 k( 0 ) [ 3Q2+4 ] = 2 k( 0 )+1 [ 3Q+2 ] = 2 k( 0 )+1 2 x ( Q 1 2+1 ) = 2 k( 0 )+( 1+x ) ( Q 1 2+1 )collect1+x,x=0,1,2,3, = 2 k( 1 ) ( Q 1 *2+1 )k( 1 )=k( 0 )+( 1+x ) (8)

after one 3n + 1 and one or more divided by 2 we got a new equation from Equation [6]:

D 1 + Y 1 = 2 k( 1 ) ( Q 1 2+1 )k( 1 )>k( 0 ) (9)

Compare to Equation [6]:

D D 1 + Y 1 , 2 k( 0 ) 2 k( 1 ) = 2 k( 0 )+( 1+x ) ,Q Q 1

Apply another 3n + 1 and divided by 2 to the odd part (Q1 * 2 + 1) of Equation [9] we got:

2 k( 1 ) [ 3( Q 1 2+1 )+1 ] =3[ 2 k( 1 ) ( Q 1 2+1 ) ]+ 2 k( 1 ) =3 D 1 +3 Y 1 + 2 k( 1 ) = D 2 + Y 2 D 2 = 3 2 D, Y 2 =3 Y 1 + 2 k( 1 )

in other way,

2 k( 1 ) [ 3( Q 1 2+1 )+1 ] = 2 k( 1 ) [ 3 Q 1 2+4 ] = 2 k( 1 )+1 [ 3 Q 1 +2 ] = 2 k( 1 )+( 1+x ) ( Q 2 2+1 )collect1+x,x=0,1,2,3, = 2 k( 2 ) ( Q 2 2+1 )k( 2 )>k( 1 )

same as Equation [9] we got

D 2 + Y 2 = 2 k( 2 ) ( Q 2 2+1 )

repeat the 3n + 1 and divided by 2 on the odd part to step n we could get:

D n + Y n = 2 k( n ) ( Q n 2+1 ) (10)

The above process could be interpreted as it approaches a certain pure even-x number 2m with continuing iteration, then we can get the following equation by combining Equation [5] and [10]:

2 m1 < D n + Y n = 2 k( n ) ( Q n 2+1 ) 2 m (11)

let Y0 = 0, then

Y 1 = 2 k( 0 ) =3 Y 0 + 2 k( 0 )

it can be figured out that Y is built up as:

Y 0 =0, Y 1 =3 Y 0 + 2 k( 0 ) , Y 2 =3 Y 1 + 2 k( 1 ) ,, Y n =3 Y n1 + 2 k( n1 )

k( 0 )<k( 1 )<<k( n1 )<k( n )

The minimum step of k is 1, and for any odd number k(0) = 0, the minimum k sequence should be:

k=0,1,2,3,

and the minimum Y sequence is as:

Y=0,1,5,19,65,211,, 3 n 2 n [17].

4.2. Find Yn

As described above, D and Y are both multiplied by 3, D is not changed, but Y is added 2k each time, so that Y is getting bigger and bigger, at the beginning Y1 < D1, along with the iteration continuing, Y will exceed D and turn to Y > D from YD at a certain step. Figure 3 shows the change in Base-3 (Ternary) - D is simply shifting left and Y is growing up along with left shifting.

Figure 3. D-Y change in Base-3 (Ternary).

Assuming Yn1Dn1 at step n − 1, and Yn > Dn at step n, from Equation (11) we got:

2 m1 < D n + Y n = D n +3 Y n1 + 2 k( n1 ) 2 m (12)

2 m1 < D n +3 Y n1 + Δ n = 2 m (13)

See Figure 4 [A, B]. To ensure from Yn1Dn1 to Yn > Dn, 2k(n1) (difference between Dn and 3*Yn1) must take the possible maximum value. From Equation (12), the maximum value of 2k(n1) could be 2m1. But if 2k(n1) = 2m1, Dn + 3*Yn1 should be ≤2m1, and result in 3*Yn1 = 0 and Dn = 2m1. For Yn1 cannot be 0, so that 2k(n1) must be less than 2m1, and the maximum possible value should be 2m2. So we got:

2 m2 D n < 2 m1

2 m2 3 Y n1 < 2 m1

2 m1 < D n +3 Y n1 2 m

See Figure 4 [C, D]

Figure 4. Find Yn.

From above analysis, we can get:

Δ n = 2 k( n1 ) = 2 m2

so that

3 Y n1 + Δ n =3 Y n1 + 2 k( n1 ) = Y n (see Figure 4 [F, G, H])

Yn satisfies Equation [5], Collatz Conjecture should be TRUE for any positive integer.

Please note that, the Yn based on condition “ Y n1 D n1 to Y n > D n “ is not the first one satisfies Equation [5], it is just used to prove such Yn exists. The test results shown that the first Y satisfies Equation [5] should be 2 steps earlier. See Figure 5 (for number 7). At step 7, Y changed from less than D to greater than D, and the first Y satisfies Equation [5] happened at step 5.

Figure 5. Changes of D, Y, m and k.

From step 5, m became a straight line which means the odd part of Equation [6] keeps the same number. The minimum difference between m and k should be 4 (from number 5, 3 × 5 + 1 = 16 = 24, will be explained later) at the first time that Y satisfies Equation [5] (step 5 in Figure 5). From step 6, k became a straight line, and mk = 2, which means the odd part of Equation [6] goes into the 1 → 4 → 2 → 1 loop as Collatz Conjecture iteration.

5. Collatz Conjecture Analysis

From now on, odd and even are used instead of odd-3 and even-3 for Base-3 (Ternary). Any even number can be converted to odd number divided by 2 according Collatz Conjecture, the analysis will only focus on odd numbers. At first, group the odd numbers into 3 groups according to the last digit d in Base-3 (ternary), same as the result mod by 3 in decimal.

On Collatz Conjecture iteration, for any odd number D = Q * 2 + 1.

  • Group 0: d = 0, there should no any odd number come to this group on Collatz Conjecture iteration, go to Group 2 if Q is odd, go to Group 1 if Q is even.

  • Group 1: d = 1, go to Group 2 if Q is odd, stay in Group 1 if Q is even.

  • Group 2: d = 2, go to Group 1 if Q is even, stay in Group 2 if Q is odd.

For convenience, decimal is used for the following analysis instead of Base-3 (ternary).

5.1. Collatz Conjecture Odd Number Groups

All odd number are grouped by 4n + 1 sequence for Collatz Conjecture. All numbers in the same sequence will go to the same odd number on Collatz Conjecture iteration with one odd step and one or more even steps:

3( 4n+1 )+1=34n+3+1=34n+4=4( 3n+1 )3n+1

5.1.1. Odd Number 1

Start from 1 we got:

S(1) = 1, 5, 21, 85, 341, ...

the nth number is: S( 1 )[ n ]= ( 2 2n 1 )/3 n=1,2,3,

All numbers in S(1) are going to 1 on one odd-step and

2, 4, 6, 8, 10, ... even-step. (even sequence).

5.1.2. Odd Number 3

S(3) = 3, 13, 53, 213, 841, ...

the nth number is: S( 3 )[ n ]= 2 2n1 +S( 1 )[ n ] n=1,2,3,

All numbers in S(3) are going to 5 (SeqN) on one odd-step and

1, 3, 5, 7, 9, ... even-step. (odd sequence).

5.1.3. Odd Number 5

5 is 2nd number of S(1).

5.1.4. Odd Number 7

S(7) = 7, 29, 117, 469, 1877, ... - odd sequence, SeqN = 11.

the nth number is: S( 7 )[ n ]=3 2 2n1 +S( 1 )[ n ] n=1,2,3,

5.1.5. Odd Number 9

S(9) = 9, 37, 149, 597, 2389, ... - even sequence, SeqN = 7.

the nth number is: S( 9 )[ n ]=2 2 2n +S( 1 )[ n ] n=1,2,3,

5.1.6. Odd Number 11

S(11) = 11, 45, 181, 725, 2901, ... - odd sequence, SeqN = 17.

the nth number is: S( 11 )[ n ]=5 2 2n1 +S( 1 )[ n ] n=1,2,3,

5.1.7. Odd Number 13

13 is the 2nd number of S(3).

5.1.8. Odd Number 15

S(15) = 15, 61, 245, 981, 3925, ... - odd sequence, SeqN = 23.

the nth number is: S( 15 )[ n ]=7 2 2n1 +S( 1 )[ n ] n=1,2,3,

5.1.9. Odd Number 17

S(17) = 17, 69, 277, 1109, 4437, ... - even sequence, SeqN = 13.

the nth number is: S( 17 )[ n ]=4 2 2n +S( 1 )[ n ] n=1,2,3,

5.1.10. Odd Number 19

S(19) = 19, 77, 309, 1237, 4949, ... - odd sequence, SeqN = 29.

the nth number is: S( 19 )[ n ]=9 2 2n1 +S( 1 )[ n ] n=1,2,3,

5.1.11. Odd Number 21

21 is the 3rd number of S(1).

5.1.12. Odd Number 23

S(23) = 23, 93, 373, 1493, 5973, ... - odd sequence, SeqN = 35.

the nth number is: S( 23 )[ n ]=11 2 2n1 +S( 1 )[ n ] n=1,2,3,

5.1.13. Odd Number 25

S(25) = 25, 101, 405, 1621, 6485, ... - even sequence, SeqN = 19.

the nth number is: S( 25 )[ n ]=6 2 2n +S( 1 )[ n ] n=1,2,3,

5.1.14. Odd Number 27

S(27) = 27, 109, 437, 1749, 6997, ... - odd sequence, SeqN = 41.

the nth number is: S( 3 )[ n ]=13 2 2n1 +S( 1 )[ n ] n=1,2,3,

5.1.15. Odd Number 29

29 is the 2nd number of S(7).

5.1.16. Odd Number 31

S(31) = 31, 125, 501, 2005, 8021, ... - odd sequence, SeqN = 47.

the nth number is: S( 31 )[ n ]=15 2 2n1 +S( 1 )[ n ] n=1,2,3,

5.1.17. Odd Number 33

S(33) = 33, 133, 533, 2133, 8533, ... - even sequence, SeqN = 25.

the nth number is: S( 33 )[ n ]=8 2 2n +S( 1 )[ n ] n=1,2,3,

5.1.18. Odd Number 35

S(35) = 35, 141, 565, 2261, 9045, ... - odd sequence, SeqN = 53.

the nth number is: S( 35 )[ n ]=17 2 2n1 +S( 1 )[ n ] n=1,2,3,

5.1.19. Odd Number 37

37 is the 2nd number of S(9).

··· ···

For any odd number D = Q*2 + 1,

  • start a new odd sequence if Q is odd number.

  • start a new even sequence if Q is even and Q/2 is odd number.

  • a sequence member otherwise.

if the integer quotient of SeqN of S(x) divided by 3 is q, for a odd sequence, the nth number is:

S( x )[ n ]=q 2 2n1 +S( 1 )[ n ] n=1,2,3,

for an even sequence, the nth item is:

S( x )[ n ]=q 2 2n +S( 1 )[ n ] n=1,2,3,

5.2. Collatz Spiral

If line up the sequences described above, and put the odd numbers in a chart, we can get a spiral as shown in Figure 6 Collatz Spiral. All numbers on the same radial line are in one sequence. An odd sequence will go to an odd number greater than the first sequence number. An even sequence will go to an odd number less than the first sequence number. S(1) is a special even sequence just loop on its first number 1.

Figure 6. Collatz spiral.

5.3. Collatz Ring

From Figure 6 we can see that each time the number across S(1), the new sequences will be added. If breaks at that point and makes rings, the sequences can show the sequences more clearly as shown in Figure 7. Expanding the ring by applying 4n + 1 on each number, 3 new sequences added between any adjacent two numbers.

Figure 7. Collatz Ring.

5.4. Collatz Tree

From Collatz Ring, it can be found that “the corresponding relationship of an odd number and a 4n + 1 sequence can be only one-to-one correspondence”.

S(1) -> 1

S(3) -> 5

Figure 8. Collatz tree (A).

Figure 9. Collatz tree (B).

S(7) -> 11

S(9) -> 7

S(11) -> 17

S(15) -> 23

S(17) -> 13

S(19) -> 29

S(23) -> 35

S(25) -> 13

S(27) -> 41

S(31) -> 47

S(33) -> 25

S(35) -> 53

... ...

So that only odd numbers in S(1) can go to 1 on Collatz Conjecture iteration, and the minimum odd number turn to 1 is 5 (the 2nd number). To take S(1) as the trunk, there should be only one branch (4n + 1 sequence) connected to each number in the S(1). In the same way, there should be only one sub branch connected each number in the branches. For any branch, there should no loop exist. For any odd number on the tree, there should be only one route down to the trunk S(1) on Collatz Conjecture iteration, then go to 1. All of the odd numbers should be on the tree which means for any odd number, there is a route and only one route to the trunk S(1) then to 1 on Collatz Conjecture iteration. Figure 8 and Figure 9 show a Collatz tree with 21 numbers in the S(1) trunk. There is no branch connected to Group 0 number.

6. Conclusion

For Collatz Conjecture is just one case of new introduced Base-X Conjecture - Base-3 (Ternary), and based on Base-X number system property and Collatz Conjecture iteration, it has been proved that for any positive integer D, there are n and m existing for Dn + Yn = 2m. Dn + Yn is just the result built up by collecting divided by 2 of Collatz Conjecture iteration. Divided by 2m will make the Collatz Conjecture get a result of 1 for any positive integer. Collatz tree further confirmed that for any odd number, there is a route and only one route down to 1 on Collatz Conjecture iteration. So it could be said that “Collatz Conjecture should be true for any positive integer”.

Acknowledgements

I would like to express my deepest appreciation to everyone made his/her effort on Collatz Conjecture, especially to Professor Jeffrey C. Lagarias for his work collected most of the papers on Collatz Conjecture.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares that there are no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Lagarias, J.C. (2011) The 3x + 1 Problem: An Annotated Bibliography (1963-1999).
https://arxiv.org/pdf/math/0309224v13
[2] Lagarias, J.C. (2012) The 3x + 1 Problem: An Annotated Bibliography, II (2000-2009).
https://arxiv.org/pdf/math/0608208
[3] Guy, R.K. (2004) E16: The 3x + 1 Problem. Unsolved Problems in Number Theory. 3rd Edition, Springer-Verlag.
[4] Lagarias, J.C. (2021) The 3x + 1 Problem: An Overview.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.02635
[5] Tao, T. (2019) Almost All Orbits of the Collatz Map Attain Almost Bounded Values.
https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.03562
[6] Carbó-Dorca, R. (2023) Collatz Conjecture Redefinition on Prime Numbers. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 11, 147-157.
https://doi.org/10.4236/jamp.2023.111011
[7] Furuta, M. (2022) Proof of Collatz Conjecture Using Division Sequence. Advances in Pure Mathematics, 12, 96-108.
https://doi.org/10.4236/apm.2022.122009
[8] Zhang, J. and Zhang, X. (2023) Collatz Iterative Trajectories of All Odd Numbers Attain Bounded Values. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 11, 3030-3041.
https://doi.org/10.4236/jamp.2023.1110200
[9] Remer, M. (2023) A Comparative Analysis of the New-3(-n)-1 Remer Conjecture and a Proof of the 3n+1 Collatz Conjecture. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 11, 2216-2220.
https://doi.org/10.4236/jamp.2023.118143
[10] Kay, D.C. (2021) Collatz Sequences and Characteristic Zero-One Strings: Progress on the 3x+1 Problem. American Journal of Computational Mathematics, 11, 226-239.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ajcm.2021.113015
[11] Kay, D.C. (2023) A Solution to the 3x + 1 Problem. American Journal of Computational Mathematics, 13, 371-377.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ajcm.2023.132020
[12] Li, K. (2022) On the Change Rule of 3x + 1 Problem. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 10, 850-864.
https://doi.org/10.4236/jamp.2022.103058
[13] Bermúdez Gómez, S. (2023) The 3x + 1 Conjecture, a Direct Path. American Journal of Computational Mathematics, 13, 350-355.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ajcm.2023.132018
[14] Hu, Z.J. (2021) The Analysis of Convergence for the 3X + 1 Problem and Crandall Conjecture for the aX + 1 Problem. Advances in Pure Mathematics, 11, 400-407.
[15] Wang, M., Yang, Y., He, Z. and Wang, M. (2022) The Proof of the 3X + 1 Conjecture. Advances in Pure Mathematics, 12, 10-28.
https://doi.org/10.4236/apm.2022.121002
[16] Soleymanpour, R.H. (2021) A Proof of Collatz Conjecture Based on a New Tree Topology.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.12135
[17] https://oeis.org/A001047

Copyright © 2025 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.