Hyers-Ulam Stability of a Generalized Second-Order Nonlinear Differential Equation ()
1. Introduction
In 1940 Ulam posed the basic problem of the stability of functional equations: Give conditions in order for a linear mapping near an approximately linear mapping to exist [1]. The problem for approximately additive mappings, on Banach spaces, was solved by Hyers [2]. The result obtained by Hyers was generalized by Rassias [3].
After then, many mathematicians have extensively investigated the stability problems of functional equations (see [4-6]).
Alsina and Ger [7] were the first mathematicians who investigated the Hyers-Ulam stability of the differential equation
They
proved that if a differentiable function
satisfies
for all
then there exists a differentiable function
satisfying
for any
such that
for all
. This result of alsina and Ger has been generalized by Takahasi et al [8]
to the case of the complex Banach space valued differential equation 
Furthermore, the results of Hyers-Ulam stability of differential equations of first order were also generalized by Miura et al. [9], Jung [10] and Wang et al. [11].
Motivation of this study comes from the work of Li [12] where he established the stability of linear differential equation of second order in the sense of the Hyers and Ulam
Li and Shen [13] proved the stability of nonhomogeneous linear differential equation of second order in the sense of the Hyers and Ulam
while Gavruta et al. [14] proved the Hyers-Ulam stability of the equation
with boundary and initial conditions.
The author in his study [15] estabilshed the HyersUlam stability of the equations of the second order

and

with the initial conditions 
In this paper we investigate the Hyers-Ulam stability of the following nonlinear differential equation of second order
(1)
with the initial condition
(2)
where

Moreover we investigate the Hyers-Ulam stability of the Emden-Fowler nonlinear differential equation of second order
(3)
with the initial condition
(4)
where

and
is bounded in
.
Definition 1.1 We will say that the Equation (1) has the Hyers-Ulam stability if there exists a positive constant
with the following property:
For every
, if
(5)
with the initial condition (2), then there exists a solution
of the Equation (1), such that
.
Definition 1.2 We say that Equation (3) has the HyersUlam stability with initial conditions (4) if there exists a positive constant
with the following property:
For every
, if
(6)
and
, then there exists some
satisfying
and
, such that
.
2. Main Results on Hyers-Ulam Stability Theorem 2.1 If
is
such that
and 
then the Equation (1) is stable in the sense of Hyers and Ulam.
Proof.
Let
and
be a twice continuously differentiable real-valued function on
We will show that there exists a function
satisfying Equation (1) such that

where
is a constant that never depends on
nor on
Since
is a continuous function on
then it keep its sign on some interval 
Without loss of generality assume that
on
Assume that
satisfies the inequation (5) with the initial conditions (2) and that

From the inequality (5) we have
(7)
Since
on
and
then by Mean Value Theorem
in
. Multiplying the inequality (7) by
and then integrating from
to
, we obtain

Since
we get that

Therefore

Hence
for all
Obviously,
satisfies the Equation (1) and the zero initial condition (2) such that

Hence the Equation (1) has the Hyers-Ulam stability with initial condition (2).
Remark 2.1 Suppose that
satisfies the inequality (5) with the initial condition (2). If

then, if

we can similarly show that the Equation (1) has the Hyers-Ulam stability with initial condition (2).
Theorem 2.2 Suppose that
is a twice continuously differentiable function and
.
If
then the Equation (3) is stable in the sense of Hyers and Ulam.
Proof.
Let
and
be a twice continuously differentiable real-valued function on
We will show that there exists a function
satisfying Equation (3) such that

where
is a constant that never depends on
nor on
Since
is a continuous function on
then it keeps its sign on some interval
Without loss of generality assume that
on 
Suppose that
satisfies the inequation (6) with the initial conditions (4) and that
We have
(8)
Since
in
then, Multiplying the inequality (8) by
and integrating, we obtain

By hypothesis
, so we get that

Therefore

Hence
for all
Clearly, the zero function
satisfies the
Equation (1) and the zero initial condition (2) such that

Hence the Equation (3) has the Hyers-Ulam stability with initial condition (4).
Remark 2.2 Suppose that
satisfies the inequality (6) with the initial condition (4). If
then, if 
we can similarly show that the Equation (3) has the Hyers-Ulam stability with initial condition (4).
Example 2.2 Consider the equation
(9)
and the inequality
(10)
where 
It should be noted that for a given
satisfies the inequation (10) and the conditions of the Theorem 2.2. Therefore the Equation (9) has the HyersUlam stability.
3. A Special Case of Equation (3)
Consider the special case (when
) of the Equation (3)
(11)
with the initial conditions
(12)
and the inequation
(13)
where 
Theorem 3.1 Assume that
is a twice continuously differentiable function and
Then, If
the Equation (11) is stable in the sense of Hyers and Ulam.
Proof. Assume that
and
that
is a twice continuously differentiable real-valued function on
We will show that there exists a function
satisfying Equation (11) such that

where
is a constant that never depends on
nor on
Since
is a continuous function on
then it keeps its sign on some interval
Without loss of generality assume that
on
Suppose that
satisfies the inequation (13) with the initial conditions (12).
We have
(14)
Applying the Mean Value Theorem to the function
on the interval
we find that
in
. Multiplying the inequality (14) by
and then integrating we obtain

If
, we obtain the inequality

Therefore

Thus
for all
The zero solution
of the
Equation (11) with the zero initial condition (12) such that

Hence the Equation (11) has the Hyers-Ulam stability with initial condition (12).
Remark 3.1 Assume that
satisfies the inequality (13) with the initial condition (12). If
then, if
we can similarly obtain the Hyers-Ulam stability criterion for the Equation (11) has with initial condition (12).
Remark 3.2 It should be noted that if
on
and
hence
on
then in the proofs of Theorem 2.1, 2.2 and 3.1, we can multiply by
the inequation (7) (and (8), (14)) to obtain the inequality

Then we can apply the same argument used above to get sufficient criteria for the Hyers-Ulam stability for the Equations (1), (3) and (11).
Example 3.1 Consider the equation
(15)
and the inequality
(16)
where 
First it should be noted that for a given
,
satisfies the inequation (16) and the conditions of the Theorem 3.1. Therefore the Equation (15) has the Hyers-Ulam stability.
4. An Additional Case On Hyers-Ulam Stability
In this section we consider the Hyers-Ulam stability of the following equation
(17)
with the initial condition
(18)
where

and
is continuous for
such that

Using an argument similar to that used in [16], we can prove the following Theorem:
Theorem 4.1 Suppose that
is a twice continuously differentiable function.
If
then the problem (17), (18) is stable in the Hyers-Ulam sense.
Proof.
Let
and
be a twice continuously differentiable real-valued function on
satisfying the inequality
(19)
We will show that there exists a function

Satisfying Equation (18) such that

where
is a constant that doesn’t depend on
nor on
If we integrate the inequality (19) with respect to
we should obtain
(20)
It is clear that
is a solution of the Equation (21)
(21)
satisfying the zero initial condition
(22)
Now, let’s estimate the difference

Since the function
satisfies the Lipschitz condition, and from the inequality (20) we have

From which it follows that

where
Hence the problem (17), (18) has the Hyers-Ulam stability.
Remark 4.1 Notice that if
satisfies Lipschitz condition
in the region
then the Emden-Fowler nonlinear differential equation
is Hyers-Ulam stable with zero initial condition.
5. Acknowledgements
The author thanks the anonymous referees for helpful comments and suggestions.