Food and Nutrition Sciences

Volume 6, Issue 5 (April 2015)

ISSN Print: 2157-944X   ISSN Online: 2157-9458

Google-based Impact Factor: 0.92  Citations  h5-index & Ranking

Production, Quality Evaluation and Sensory Acceptability of Mixed Fruit Juice from Pawpaw and Lime

HTML  XML Download Download as PDF (Size: 254KB)  PP. 532-537  
DOI: 10.4236/fns.2015.65055    5,360 Downloads   8,159 Views  Citations

ABSTRACT

Pawpaw and lime juices were blended to produce mixed pawpaw/lime juice samples in the ratios of 90:10, 80:20, 70:30, 60:40 and 50:50) v/v giving samples A, B, C, D and E respectively. The moisture, mineral and vitamin contents, as well as the physical, microbiological and sensory qualities of the individual juices and blended samples were evaluated. While lime juice had higher moisture, calcium and vitamin C with values of 97.90%, 2.21 mg/100 g and 67.47 mg/100 g as compared to pawpaw juice with 92.96%, 1.53 mg/100 g and 35.49 mg/100 g respectively; the pawpaw juice had higher ash, phosphorus and vitamin A contents, with values of 3.12%, 54.97 mg/100 g and 5.90 IU/100 g as against 2.84%, 29.53% and 0.16% for lime juice respectively. While there was a general increase in moisture, calcium and vitamin C contents with blending, ash, phosphorus and vitamin A contents increased with increase in lime. The total solids content and specific gravity of pawpaw juice were remarkably higher at 7.04% and 1.15 g/m3 compared to 2.09% and 1.09 g/m3 respectively for lime juice. However, lime juice had a higher titratable acidity, while recording a lower pH of 2.89 as compared to 5.36 for pawpaw juice. The Total Viable Count (TVC) of lime juice was much lower (2.33 × 105 CFU/ml) than that of pawpaw juice (5.33 × 106 CFU/ml). There was significant difference (p < 0.05) in all the sensory parameters evaluated. Generally, there was an increase in the scores of each parameter from sample A to B and then a decline through to sample E. Sample B (80:20) mixed pawpaw/lime juice was most preferred, while sample E (50:50) was least preferred.

Share and Cite:

Ameh, B. , Gernah, D. , Obioha, O. and Ekuli, G. (2015) Production, Quality Evaluation and Sensory Acceptability of Mixed Fruit Juice from Pawpaw and Lime. Food and Nutrition Sciences, 6, 532-537. doi: 10.4236/fns.2015.65055.

Cited by

[1] Apple mutant trees with low chilling requirements: Proximal, genetic and DNA methylation analyses
Saucedo, F Castillo-Reyes… - Biocatalysis and …, 2022
[2] Development and antioxidant characterization of Ginger-Mint drink prepared through different extraction techniques
2021
[3] Sensory evaluation of strawberry fruit juice by fuzzy logic and evaluation of antioxidant activity during frozen storage
2020
[4] ارزیابی حسی با استفاده از روش منطق فازی و بررسی خواص فیزیکوشیمیایی، فعالیت آنتی‌اکسیدانی و فنل کل در آب میوه حاصل از شاه‌توت نگهداری‌شده به روش انجمادی‎
2020
[5] ارزیابی حسی آب‌میوه توت‌فرنگی توسط منطق فازی و بررسی فعالیت آنتی‌اکسیدانی آن طی نگهداری انجمادی‎
2020
[6] Quality Evaluation of Fresh Papaya Fruits Stored in Evaporative Coolers
2020
[7] Immunomodulatory and phytomedicinal properties of watermelon juice and pulp (Citrullus lanatus Linn): A review
2020
[8] Lime potentials as biopreservative as alternative to chemical preservatives in pineapple, orange and watermelon juice blend
2020
[9] Sensory evaluation using fuzzy logic model and evaluation of physicochemical properties, antioxidant activity and total phenol of fruit juice prepared from mulberry …
2020
[10] Influence of cashew steaming on the quality attributes of cashew-pawpaw mixed fruit juice
2020
[11] ارزیابی حسی با استفاده از روش منطق فازي و بررسی خواص فیزیکوشیمیایی، فعالیت آنتی اکسیدانی و فنل کل در آب میوه حاصل از شاه توت نگهداري شده به روش انجمادي.‎
2020
[12] ارزیابی حسی با استفاده از روش منطق فازی و بررسی خواص فیزیکوشیمیایی، فعالیت آنتی‌اکسیدانی و فنل کل در آب میوه حاصل از شاه‌توت نگهداری‌شده به روش …‎
علوم و صنایع …, 2020
[13] Proximate analysis and sensory evaluation of freshly produced apple fruit juice stored at different temperatures and treated with natural and artificial preservatives
2019
[14] Shelf Life Determination of Pineapple Juice Using Extended Storage Studies (ESS) Method
2019
[15] The Shelf life Stability of Mixed Fruit and Vegetable Juice with Moringa Oleifera Leaves Extract
Journal of Biochemical Technology, 2018
[16] The Effect of Moringa Oleifera Leaves Extract on Extending the Shelf Life and Quality of Freshly Sweet Orange Juice
Journal of Biochemical Technology, 2018
[17] Comparative Study of Packaged Fruits Juice in Bikaner City of Rajasthan
2018
[18] EFFECT OF ULTRAVIOLET IRRADIATION WITH DEAN VORTEX TECHNOLOGY ON QUALITY OF PINEAPPLE-MANGO JUICE BLEND
2018
[19] COMPARATIVE STUDY ON PHYSICOCHEMICAL & MICROBIAL PROPERTIES OF DIFFERENT FORMULATED NATURAL PAPAYA FRUIT JUICE
2017
[20] Nitrate Reduction in Canned Apples and Pears Using Calcium Hydrogen Phosphate (CaHPO4)
Iranian Journal of Toxicology, 2017
[21] Effect of chitosan-alginate encapsulation with inulin on survival of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG during apple juice storage and under simulated gastrointestinal conditions
LWT-Food Science and Technology, 2016
[22] Nutritional quality and bioactive compounds of some fruit juices
Advances in Environmental Biology, 2016
[23] Anti-anemic potential of beetroot (Beta Vulgaris), pineapple (Ananas comosus) and papaya (Carica papaya) juice in phenylhydrazine treated Wistar rats.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.